Table 2.
Compound | Clinical data | In vitro Ki (μM) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ki ,app, μM | f PYR | OCT2 | MATE1 | MATE2‐K | |
Metformin | 1.05 ± 0.39 (0.137) | 0.766 ± 0.103 | 37.9 ± 5.6 | 0.154 ± 0.029 | 0.0941 ± 0.016 |
N 1‐methyladenosine | 1.94 ± 0.96 (0.252) | 0.792 ± 0.188 | 0.466 ± 0.043 | ND | 0.0680 ± 0.015 |
Creatinine | 0.0914 ± 0.0661 (0.0119) | 0.260 ± 0.026 | 1.57 ± 0.24 | ND | ND |
N 1‐methylnicotinamide a | 1.37 ± 0.63 (0.178) | 0.863 ± 0.157 | 41.2 ± 9.1 | 0.125 ± 0.026 | 0.0821 ± 0.018 |
Ki ,app and f PYR were determined by iterative nonlinear regression analysis using renal clerance ratio, and average pyrimethamine concentrations, as described in the Methods. In vitro Ki were determined by iterative nonlinear regression analysis using the data shown in Figure 5 . Number in the parenthesis represents the Ki ,app corrected by the unbound fraction of pyrimethamine in the plasma (0.13). Each parameter represents the fitted parameter with computer calculated SD. K i was calculated from IC50, assuming IC50 approximates K i when substrate concentration is lower than the Km.
Cav, mean plasma concentration; f PYR, fraction sensitive to inhibition by pyrimethamine; Ki, inhibition constant; K i,app, apparent inhibition constant of pyrimethamine as the total concentration; ND, not determined.
CLr calculated from time zero to 12 hours was used in the analysis.