Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 18;27(5):2169–2179. doi: 10.1007/s11581-021-03949-7

Table 2.

Comparison of specific capacitances for CMS sample with carbon materials in relevant reports

Sample name Raw material Specific capacity Electrolyte Power density (device) Energy density (device) Reference
HPC-4 Waste PET bottles 413 ± 19 F·g−1/1 A·g−1 (−1–0 V) 6 M KOH 450 W·kg−1 25 W·h·kg−1 [29]
PSC-3-700 Expanded polystyrene foam 327 F·g−1/1 A·g−1 (−0.2–0.8 V) 1 M H2SO4 250 W·kg−1 10.2 W·h·kg−1 [30]
LPCD-30 Waste lignin 325 F·g−1/1 A·g−1 (−1–0 V) 6 M KOH 100 W·kg−1 8.4 W·h·kg−1 [31]
LS-800 Loofah sponge 304 F·g−1/1 A·g−1 (−1–0 V) 6 M KOH 500 W·kg−1 10 W·h·kg−1 [18]
NPCs-2-700 Melamine-urea-formaldehyde resins 341 F·g−1/1 A·g−1 (−0.2–(−0.8) V) 6 M KOH 350.15 W·kg−1 9.6 W·h·kg−1 [32]
KOH-1 Cellulose 162 F·g−1/0.5 A·g−1 (−1–0 V) 6 M KOH 5532 W·kg−1 4.1 W·h·kg−1 [33]
CMS-3 Waste face mask 328.9 F·g−1/1 A·g−1 (−0.8–0 V) 6 M KOH 300 W·kg−1 11.2 W·h·kg−1 This work