Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Feb 18.
Published in final edited form as: Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2019 Nov 11;110:104526. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2019.104526

Table 1:

Utility of genomics for de-risking positive findings in rodent 2-year carcinogenicity studies - pharmaceutical development case studies

Rodent 2-year carcinogenicity study outcomes Proposed mode of action Genomic data Human relevance? Impact
Histiocytic sarcoma in multiple tissues (mouse; not rat) Unknown 1) Deep sequencing of mouse histiocytic sarcomas excluded viral-based tumor etiology.
2) Early onset and persistent activation of IFN γ-associated gene expression signature followed by late onset of histiocytic sarcoma-associated gene expression signature in affected mouse tissues (not observed in rats or in PBMCs from patients in a clinical phase IIb study)
Likely human irrelevant (based on species differences in molecular pathways associated with mouse histiocytic sarcomas) Reassured health authority and supported further clinical development.
Liver/thyroid tumors (mouse and rat) CAR activator 1) CAR activator-induced gene expression signatures observed in liver (Peffer et al., 2018; Rooney et al., 2018) from rat 4 week repeat dose toxicity study
2) Absence of AhR-, PPARα, activator-induced gene expression signatures in liver from rat 4 week repeat dose toxicity study (Rooney et al., 2018)
Human-irrelevant mode of action based on established species differences in CAR-mediated proliferative responses and human epidemiological data on phenobarbital Reassured health authority and supported further clinical development; Integration of genomics and histopathology data from subchronic toxicology studies would also have supported a Category 3a carcinogenicity study waiver under the proposed ICH S1 revision.
Liver/ lung tumors (mouse and rat) Sustained AhR activation Careful attention to dose-response with regard to thresholds and kinetics of CYP1A1 and CYP1A2 activation as liver tissue transcriptomic biomarkers of AhR activation tone (Qin et al., 2019; Taylor et al., 2015) Likely human relevant but only when a therapeutic dose level may be associated with sustained activation above a defined threshold Reassures both sponsor and health authorities when hypertrophy/ hyperplasia seen in a chronic study is not associated with sustained suprathreshold AhR activity