Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Behav Med. 2019 Jun 13;43(4):638–647. doi: 10.1007/s10865-019-00070-z

Table 3.

Preferences for physical activity programming.

Meeting PA Guidelines
p-value
No Yes
Importance of physical activity to personal healtha <.0001
 Not at all important 1 (0.7%) 0 (0%)
 Not very important 1 (0.7%) 4 (1.1%)
 Somewhat important 42 (30.7%) 52 (14.1%)
 Important 59 (43.1%) 146 (39.7%)
 Very important 34 (24.8%) 166 (45.1%)
Interest in joining a physical activity intervention assuming fit with schedule/location/preferencesb
.80
 Not at all interested 14 (10.7%) 38 (10.4%)
 Not very interested 18 (13.7%) 50 (13.7%)
 Somewhat interested 42 (32.1%) 104 (28.5%)
 Interested 25 (19.1%) 89 (24.4%)
 Very interested 32 (24.4%) 84 (23.0%)
Reasons for joining a physical activity programc
 Improve health 98 (82.7%) 267 (80.9%) .99
 Lose weight 94 (77.7%) 235 (71.2%) .15
 Increase energy 89 (73.6%) 232 (70.3%) .48
 Support and motivation for PA 45 (37.1%) 146 (44.1%) .16
 Meet new people 28 (23.1%) 74 (22.4%) .80
 Other 6 (5.0%) 19 (5.8%) .99
Preferred delivery mode (Check up to 3)d
 A group program that meets in person 72 (63.7%) 190 (58.4%) .32
 A smartphone-based app 31 (27.4%) 117 (35.9%) .11
 Printed materials in the mail 33 (29.2%) 94 (28.8%) .99
 Email 25 (22.1%) 75 (23.0%) .89
 Text messages 17 (15.0%) 65 (19.9%) .27
 Phone calls with an individual coach 14 (12.4%) 43 (13.2%) 1.00
 Social media 11 (9.7%) 39 (12.0%) .61
Preferred activities (Multi-check)e
 Walking 109 (83.2%) 282 (77.7%) .21
 Yoga 82 (62.6%) 231 (63.6%) .83
 Strength training 54 (41.2%) 182 (50.1%) .08
 Biking 42 (32.1%) 143 (39.4%) .14
 Group aerobics class 37 (28.2%) 123 (33.9%) .28
 Running 15 (11.5%) 63 (17.4%) .13
Importance of individual support from a coach?
 Mean score (1-5 scale) 2.9 (1.2) 2.9 (1.1) .77
a

Proportion of missing values: 0.4%

b

Proportion of missing values: 2.2%

c

Proportion of missing values ranges from 10.8-11.2%

d

N’s are the number of participants who indicated at least one preference. Percentages are calculated using these Ns as a denominator. Percentages sum to >1 within each column because participants could choose more than one option.

e

Proportion of missing values: 2.6%