Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 6;75(3):232–241. doi: 10.1136/jech-2020-214691

Table 3.

Key results and quality assessments for studies investigating household composition (n=7), household tenure (n=4) and household rurality (n=7), structured per social determinant

Risk of Bias§
First author (Year) Key results Selection Information (Exposure) Information (Outcome) Confounding
Household composition
Agborsangaya (2012)61 Yes

No
OR 2.11¶ (1.60–2.78)

Data not available
Living with children vs not living with children

Living with adults vs not living with adults
Age, sex, education and household income H M M L
Cantarero-Prieto (2018)70 Yes OR 1.20 (1.04–1.39, p<0.05) Living alone vs cohabits Unclear U U M U
Henchoz (2019)37 Yes OR 1.40* (1.21–1.61) Living alone vs cohabits No adjustment U M M M
Melis (2014)45 No OR 1.34 (0.60–3.01) Living alone vs cohabits No adjustment U M L H
Mounce (2018)47 No HR 0.93 (0.71–1.21, p=0.580) Living alone vs cohabits Baseline age, sex, total wealth, educational attainment, health behaviours, social detachment and locus of control U M M L
Prazeres (2015)52 No OR 1.4§ (0.9–2.3, p=0.182)

OR 1.0§ (0.6–1.7, p=0.985)

OR 1.3§ (0.7–2.6, p=0.410)
Living as a couple vs alone

Living as extended family vs alone

Living in other situation (inc. care home) vs alone
Age, sex, marital status, education, professional status, residence area, living arrangement H M L L
Schäfer (2012)60 No −0.10 conditions (−0.42–0.23, p=0.562)

0.24 conditions (−0.14–0.62, p=0.210)

−0.01 conditions (−0.59–0.57, p=0.231)
Living at home with spouse vs home alone

Living at home with family members or others vs home alone

Living in assisted living or retirement home vs home alone
Age, gender, marital status, job autonomy, household composition, income H M L U
Household tenure
Chung(2015)65 Yes OR 1.17 (1.11–1.24, p=0.003)

OR 1.19 (1.09–1.29, p=0.041)

OR 1.11 (1.05–1.18, p=0.070)
Homeowner vs public (social) housing

Private renting vs public (social) housing

Subsidised housing vs public (social) housing
Age, gender, education, housing, employment H M M L
Johnson-Lawrence (2017)69 Yes OR 1.19 (1.15–1.24) Renters vs homeowners Age, gender, ethnicity, education, interview year, region, marital status, last doctor visit, employment, household income U M H L
Lebenbaum(2018)66 Yes OR 0.82 (0.78–0.87, p<0.001) Homeowners vs non-homeowners Age, age2, sex, marital status, immigration status, education, rurality, homeownership, smoking, alcohol use L M H L
Schäfer (2012)60 No −0.13 conditions (−0.30–0.05, p=0.148) Homeowners vs non-homeowners Age, gender, marital status, job autonomy, household composition, income H M L U
Rurality
Cantarero-Prieto (2018)70 No OR 0.92 (0.93–1.03, p>0.1) Living in rural vs non-rural areas Unclear U U M U
Foguet-Boreu (2014)36 Yes OR 1.04*,** (1.03–1.05) Living in rural (<10 000 inhabitants and/or population density <150 people/km2) vs non-rural areas Unadjusted U L L U
Lebenbaum (2018)66 No OR 0.98 (0.93–1.02, p=0.323) Rural vs non-rural areas Age, age2, sex, marital status, immigration status, education, rurality, homeownership, smoking, alcohol use L M H L
Lujic (2017)43 Yes OR 1.14† (1.03–1.26) Living in remote/very remote areas (vs major cities) Age and sex H M M M
Prazeres (2015)52 No OR 1.0‡ (0.8–1.3, p=0.746) Living in rural vs urban areas Age, sex, marital status, education, professional status, residence area, living arrangement H M L L
Roberts (2015)53 Yes OR 1.1 (1.0–1.3) Living in rural vs urban areas Age, sex, household education, household income, Aboriginal status, activity level, smoking, stress, blood pressure, obesity H M H M
Ryan (2018)54 Yes OR 0.85* (0.85–0.86) Living in rural (<10 000 inhabitants) vs non-rural areas Age-sex standardised L L L M

*OR calculated from data reported in paper.

†Based on self-reported health data. Findings consistent across hospital and medication health data.

‡Multimorbidity defined as ≥2 chronic conditions.

§H, High; M, Medium; L, Low; U, Unclear.

¶Associations greater for 65+.

**Inequalities similar with gender and greater≥45 years.