TABLE 2.
Predictor | Model 1 |
Model 2 |
||||
Psychological capital |
Anxiety |
|||||
b | se | t | b | se | t | |
Gender | 0.11 (0.11) | 0.04 (0.06) | 2.66** (1.79) | 0.07 (0.03) | 0.04 (0.06) | 1.73 (0.46) |
Problematic social media usage | −0.30 (−0.33) | 0.02 (0.03) | −14.03*** (−11.34***) | 0.29 (0.19) | 0.02 (0.03) | 14.58*** (6.61***) |
Psychological capital | −0.35 (−0.39) | 0.02 (0.03) | −17.57*** (−13.76***) | |||
R2 | 0.09 (0.11) | 0.26 (0.24) | ||||
F | 106.08*** (68.11***) | 246.22*** (109.88***) |
Gender was dummy coded such that 1 = male and 0 = female. Model 1 regressed psychological capital on problematic social media usage and gender; Model 2 regressed anxiety on problematic social media usage, psychological capital, and gender, respectively; the b values were standardized coefficients. The data outside the brackets were for university students whose academic performance had been affected by the pandemic (n1 = 2056), and the data inside the brackets were for university students whose academic performance had not been affected by the pandemic (n2 = 1067). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.