Table 1.
Inflamed dataset | Non-inflamed dataset | P values | |
---|---|---|---|
Inflammation, no. (%) | |||
Inflamed | 112 [100] | 0 | |
Non-inflamed | 0 | 168 [100] | |
Location, no. (%) | |||
Colon | 81 [72] | 110 [65] | = 0.28 |
Ileum | 31 [28] | 58 [35] | |
Diagnosis, no. (%) | |||
Crohn’s disease | 63 [56] | 110 [65] | = 0.29 |
IBD undefined | 12 [11] | 15 [9] | |
Ulcerative colitis | 37 [33] | 43 [26] | |
Sex, no. (%) | |||
Female | 68 [61] | 103 [61] | = 1 |
Age at biopsy, mean ± SD | 42.7 ± 15.1 | 42 ± 15.1 | PWilcoxon = 0.61 |
Medication, yes (%) | |||
Mesalazines | 36 [32] | 49 [29] | = 0.69 |
Steroids | 26 [23] | 31 [18] | = 0.38 |
Thiopurines | 31 [28] | 46 [27] | = 0.95 |
Methotrexate | 1 [1] | 4 [2] | NA |
Anti-TNF | 20 [18] | 37 [22] | = 0.51 |
Montreal classification, no. (%) | |||
Within CD | |||
Montreal A | |||
A1: <17 years | 9 [14] | 14 [13] | = 0.23 |
A2: 17–40 years | 40 [63] | 81 [74] | |
A3: >40 years | 14 [22] | 15 [14] | |
Montreal L | |||
L1 (+L4) | 9 (2) [14 (3)] | 23 (3) [21 (3)] | = 0.23 |
L2 (+L4) | 14 (2) [22 (3)] | 17 (2) [15 (2)] | |
L3 (+L4) | 29 (7) [46 (11)] | 55 (10) [50 (9)] | |
Montreal B | [1 missing] | [1 missing] | |
B1 (p) | 17 (11) [27 (17)] | 37 (17) [34 (16)] | = 0.49 |
B2 (P) | 16 (9) [25 (14)] | 23 (16) [21 (15)] | |
B3 (P) | 6 (3) [10 (5)] | 7 (9) [6 (8)] | |
Within UC + IBDU | |||
Montreal E | [5 missing] | [4 missing] | |
E1 | 2 [5] | 2 [4] | = 0.93 |
E2 | 15 [34] | 17 [31] | |
E3 | 27 [61] | 35 [65] | |
Montreal S | [11 missing] | [15 missing] | = 0.93 |
S1 | 0 | 1 [2] | |
S2 | 6 [16] | 7 [16] | |
S3 | 20 [53] | 23 [53] | |
S4 | 12 [32] | 12 [28] |
P values of comparing categorical variables between groups are from two-sided χ2 test; P values of comparing continuous variable between two groups are from two-sided Wilcoxon’s test.