TABLE 3.
Bravais-Pearson coefficients (r) for correlation analysis performed between all sugar accumulation traits, tver and BWv for all replicates (cultivar × year × block) considered together.
| tver | rconc | rcont | S95–conc | S95–cont | t95–conc | t95–cont | Durconc | Durcont | BWv | |
| tver | – | ns | –0.11 | –0.31 | –0.21 | 0.50 | 0.47 | –0.29 | –0.16 | –0.11 |
| rconc | – | – | 0.27 | 0.24 | –0.16 | –0.62 | –0.33 | −0.73 | –0.40 | –0.29 |
| rcont | – | – | – | 0.17 | 0.58 | –0.22 | –0.48 | –0.16 | –0.47 | 0.57 |
| S95–conc | – | – | – | – | 0.16 | 0.06 | –0.21 | 0.33 | ns | –0.19 |
| S95–cont | – | – | – | – | – | 0.10 | 0.17 | 0.29 | 0.33 | 0.92 |
| t95–conc | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0.59 | 0.68 | 0.32 | 0.11 |
| t95–cont | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0.26 | 0.80 | 0.16 |
| Durconc | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0.49 | 0.21 |
| Durcont | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0.26 |
| BWv | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
The correlations shown in bold had r > 0.71, or r2 > 0.50.