TABLE 5.

Analysis of variance as performed by type III ANOVA showing the amount of variance in the eight sugar accumulation traits explained by different environmental variables for all cultivars considered together.

	Relative contribution of variance components (%)
Source	Durcont	S95–conc	rconc	rcont	t95–conc	t95–cont	S95–cont	Durconc
tver	22.7	ns	12.4	7.6	43.5	ns	ns	27.2
BWv	6.0	6.6	21.7	31.4	3.0	3.1	88.7	7.6
Tf–v	7.7	11.9	ns	7.5	ns	8.1	1.6	ns
PARf–v	ns	7.2	2.7	1.0	7.4	ns	0.9	8.3
RRf–v	8.4	44.1	7.3	0.7	12.3	3.6	5.8	32.4
Tv–95	13.0	ns	31.2	ns	30.7	20.9	ns	22.8
PARv–95	40.3	13.6	22.8	51.9	ns	59.4	ns	ns
δ13C	1.9	16.5	2.0	ns	3.0	4.8	2.9	1.8
r2 model	71.8	36.8	28.0	47.5	44.3	77.4	70.3	32.2

ANOVA run with n = 1008 individual observations. ns, not significant.