Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 10;11(2):1229. doi: 10.4081/jphia.2020.1229

Table 2.

HIV prevalence by sociodemographic and sexual behavioural characteristics of commercial farm workers from IOM’s IBBSS study in Mpumalanga and Limpopo, South Africa, 2010 (n=2,758).

HIV - Na (%) HIV + Na (%) P-value
Engagement in transactional sex 0.09
    No 1350(61) 872(39)
    Yes 303(57) 231(43)
Sex <0.001
    Male 849(68) 393(32)
    Female 803(53) 708(47)
Age <0.001
    < 25 315(71) 129(29)
    25 – 29 307(58) 221(42)
    30 – 34 218(47) 248(53)
    35 – 39 208(48) 221(52)
    40 – 44 203(64) 116(36)
    > 44 403(70) 169(30)
Marital status <0.001
    Never married 531(55) 427(45)
    Married 1039(63) 610(37)
    Formerly married 70(53) 63(47)
Recent multiple sexual partnerships 0.03
    No 992(62) 620(38)
    Yes 635(57) 470(43)
Food securityb 0.18
    Yes 823(59) 579(41)
    No 800(61) 506(39)
Recent history of sexually transmitted infection <0.001
    No 1434(61) 898(39)
    Yes 202(51) 198(49)
Condom use last sex with non-regular partner 0.87
    Yes 885(60) 584(40)
    No 749(60) 507(40)
Recent history of sexual violence 0.005
    No 1428(61) 912(39)
    Yes 178(53) 158(47)
Migration statusc 0.15
    Non-Migrant 971(59) 683(41)
    Migrant 660(62) 413(38)

HIV- = HIV negative. HIV+ = HIV positive. aThe totals vary due to missing values. bRespondents’ answer to “I always have sufficient money to buy food for myself”. cNon-migrant = South African citizens; migrant = non-South African citizens.