Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Feb 19.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2020 Oct 1;2(4):100230. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100230

Table 2.

Demographic information by treatment condition: PREPP intervention or Enhanced Treatment as Usual (ETAU) (n=60)

Treatment
Total Sample PREPP ETAU Diff between groups
(n=60) (n=30) (n=30)
Variables n Mean (SD) n Mean (SD) n Mean (SD) p-valuea
or % or % or %
Demographics
Number of children 0.55
 = 0 23 40.40% 12 44.40% 11 36.70%
 > 0 34 59.60% 15 55.60% 19 63.30%
Age 57 28.2 (5.9) 27 27.4 (5.7) 30 28.9 (6.1) 0.374
Race/Ethnicity 0.358
 Hispanic / Latina 48 84.20% 24 88.90% 24 80.00%
 Not Hispanic / Latina 9 15.80% 3 11.10% 6 20.00%
Baby sex 0.781
 Male 25 48.10% 13 50.00% 12 46.20%
 Female 27 51.90% 13 50.00% 14 53.80%
Baseline symptom scores
EPDS 54 4.8 (3.6) 27 4.5 (3.7) 27 5.2 (3.6) 0.418
HRSD 59 5.6 (4.5) 30 5 (3.9) 29 6.2 (5) 0.28
HRSA 59 5.3 (3.8) 30 4.6 (3.7) 29 6.1 (3.9) 0.134
PHQ-9 53 4.8 (3.7) 27 4.6 (3.8) 26 5 (3.6) 0.664
Baseline disorders
EPDS 1
  >= 9 9 16.70% 5 18.50% 4 14.80%
HRSD 0.792
  >= 7 23 39.00% 11 36.70% 12 41.40%
HRSA 0.612
  >= 14 3 5.10% 1 3.30% 2 6.90%
PHQ-9 0.669
  >= 10 6 11.30% 4 14.80% 2 7.70%
a

Baseline differences are assessed using Wilcoxon for continuous measures and Fisher’s Exact test for categorical measures