Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 18;34(2):327–389. doi: 10.1111/jar.12809

TABLE 1.

Summary of included publications

Author(s) and country Study sample Data collection method Type(s) of aggressive behaviour (instruments) Psychosocial factor(s) (instruments) Association Outcome Statistical analysis

Alexander et al. (2010), UK

Low quality

n = 138 adults (109M, 29F) with mild intellectual disability and offending behaviours in an inpatient service for offenders Retrospective chart review Physically aggressive behaviour (case file: defined as history of aggression, recorded as either present or absent) Psychiatric diagnosis: personality disorder (ICD‐10 diagnosis derived from case file) NS OR = 1.53, CI [0.49; 4.83] Univariate, odds ratio a
Verbally aggressive behaviour (case file: defined as history of aggression, recorded as either present or absent) Psychiatric diagnosis: personality disorder (ICD‐10 diagnosis derived from case file) NS OR = 2.20, CI [0.50; 9.61] Univariate, odds ratio a
Destructive behaviour (case file: defined as history of aggression, recorded as either present or absent) Psychiatric diagnosis: personality disorder (ICD‐10 diagnosis derived from case file) NS OR = 1.51, CI [0.52; 4.42] Univariate, odds ratio a
Self‐injurious behaviour (case file: defined as history of aggression, recorded as either present or absent) Psychiatric diagnosis: personality disorder (ICD‐10 diagnosis derived from case file) NS OR = 1.47, CI [0.63; 3.41] Univariate, odds ratio a
Sexually aggressive behaviour (case file: defined as history of aggression, recorded as either present or absent) Psychiatric diagnosis: personality disorder (ICD‐10 diagnosis derived from case file) NS OR = 1.79, CI [0.91; 3.54] Univariate, odds ratio a

Alexander et al. (2015), UK

Low quality

n = 138 adults (109M, 29F) with mild intellectual disability and offending behaviours in an inpatient service for offenders Retrospective chart review Destructive behaviour (case file: defined as history of fire setting or conviction of arson in the case history) Life events: past experience of any abuse (evidence of child or vulnerable adult protection by Social Services) + OR = 2.88, CI [1.21; 6.88] Univariate, odds ratio a
Life events: past experience of sexual abuse (evidence of child or vulnerable adult protection by Social Services) NS OR = 1.93, CI [0.85; 4.39] Univariate, odds ratio a
Psychiatric diagnosis: PDD (ICD‐10 diagnosis derived from case file) NS OR = 0.50, CI [0.19; 1.34] Univariate, odds ratio a
Psychiatric diagnosis: psychosis (ICD‐10 diagnosis derived from case file) NS OR = 1.38, CI [0.52; 3.67] Univariate, odds ratio a
Psychiatric diagnosis: bipolar disorder (ICD‐10 diagnosis derived from case file) NS OR = 0.22, CI [0.03; 1.78] Univariate, odds ratio a
Psychiatric diagnosis: depressive disorder (ICD‐10 diagnosis derived from case file) NS OR = 1.39, CI [0.49; 3.94] Univariate, odds ratio a
Psychiatric diagnosis: substance dependence (ICD‐10 diagnosis derived from case file) NS OR = 1.93, CI [0.82; 4.51] Univariate, odds ratio a
Psychiatric diagnosis: personality disorder (ICD‐10 diagnosis derived from case file) + OR = 4.08, CI [1.54; 10.79] Univariate, odds ratio a
Criminal behaviour: history of convictions for violent offences (case file) + OR = 3.13, CI [1.36; 7.23] Univariate, odds ratio a
Criminal behaviour: history of convictions for destructive offences (case file) + OR = 185.42, CI [10.55; 3,259.22] Univariate, odds ratio a
Criminal behaviour: history of convictions for sex offences (case file) NS OR = 0.94, CI [0.34; 2.59] Univariate, odds ratio a
Aggressive behaviour: physical (case file: defined as a history of aggression to people, recorded as either present or absent) NS OR = 0.46, CI [0.13; 1.71] Univariate, odds ratio a
Aggressive behaviour: verbal (case file: defined as a history of verbal aggression, recorded as either present or absent) NS OR = 1.45, CI [0.16; 12.91] Univariate, odds ratio a
Aggressive behaviour: destructive (case file: defined as a history of aggression against property, recorded as either present or absent) NS OR = 0.41, CI [0.12; 1.37] Univariate, odds ratio a
Aggressive behaviour: sexual (case file: defined as a history of sexual aggression, recorded as either present or absent) NS OR = 1.90, CI [0.82; 4.38] Univariate, odds ratio a
Aggressive behaviour: self‐injurious (case file: defined as a history of aggression to self, recorded as either present or absent) NS OR = 2.39, CI [0.66; 8.60] Univariate, odds ratio a

Allen et al. (2012), UK

Low quality

n = 707 adults (410M, 297F) with intellectual disability and challenging behaviour (M age = 42, range 18–93), living in different settings Informant reports by primary carers Destructive behaviour (Individual Schedule) Psychiatric symptoms: affective/neurotic, possible organic (PAS‐ADD) + ρ = .081 Univariate, Spearman rank correlation
Psychiatric symptoms: possible organic (PAS‐ADD) + ρ = .11 Univariate, Spearman rank correlation
Psychiatric symptoms: psychotic disorder (PAS‐ADD) NS Not reported Univariate, Spearman rank correlation
Self‐injurious behaviour (Individual Schedule) Psychiatric symptoms: affective/neurotic (PAS‐ADD) NS Not reported Univariate, Spearman rank correlation
Psychiatric symptoms: possible organic (PAS‐ADD) NS Not reported Univariate, Spearman rank correlation
Psychiatric symptoms: psychotic disorder (PAS‐ADD) NS Not reported Univariate, Spearman rank correlation
Aggressive behaviour in general (Individual Schedule) Psychiatric symptoms: affective/neurotic (PAS‐ADD) + ρ = .10 Univariate, Spearman rank correlation
Psychiatric symptoms: possible organic (PAS‐ADD) + ρ = .14 Univariate, Spearman rank correlation
Psychiatric symptoms: psychotic disorder (PAS‐ADD) NS Not reported Univariate, Spearman rank correlation

Bernstein et al. (2015), Hungary

High quality

n = 50 adults (38M, 12F) with moderate, severe, or profound intellectual disability, residing in a developmental habilitation home (M age = 31.38, SD = 7.63, range 19–49) Informant reports by care staff Physically aggressive behaviour (CBI) Psychiatric symptoms: mood (MIPQ‐S) NS ρ = .02 Univariate, Spearman correlation
Psychiatric symptoms: interest/pleasure (MIPQ‐S) NS ρ = −.11 Univariate, Spearman correlation
Aggressive behaviour: general (BPI‐S) + ρ = .78 Univariate, Spearman correlation
Aggressive behaviour: self‐injurious (BPI‐S, CBI) NS

ρ = .27 (BPI‐S)

ρ = .45 (CBI)

Univariate, Spearman correlation
Self‐injurious behaviour (BPI‐S, CBI) Psychiatric symptoms: mood (MIPQ‐S) NS

ρ = −.17 (BPI‐S)

ρ = −.12 (CBI)

Univariate, Spearman correlation
Psychiatric symptoms: interest/pleasure (MIPQ‐S) NS

ρ = −.44 (BPI‐S)

ρ = −.23 (CBI)

Univariate, Spearman correlation
Aggressive behaviour: physical (CBI) NS ρ = .45 Univariate, Spearman correlation
Aggressive behaviour: general (BPI‐S) + ρ = .57 Univariate, Spearman correlation
Aggressive behaviour in general (BPI‐S) Psychiatric symptoms: mood (MIPQ‐S) NS ρ = .13 Univariate, Spearman correlation
Psychiatric symptoms: interest/pleasure (MIPQ‐S) NS ρ = .01 Univariate, Spearman correlation
Aggressive behaviour: physical (CBI) + ρ = .78 Univariate, Spearman correlation
Aggressive behaviour: self‐injurious (CBI) + ρ = .57 Univariate, Spearman correlation

Bowring et al. (2017), USA

Low quality

n = 265 adults (134M, 131F) with mild, moderate, severe, or profound intellectual disability who (had) received support from services (M age = 41.44, SD = 16.28) and lived in different settings Informant reports by family members or care staff Self‐injurious behaviour (BPI‐S) Communication skills: non‐verbal b (Individual survey) RR = 4.705, CI [1.953; 11.333] Univariate, relative risk estimation
Communication skills: no clear speech b (Individual survey) RR = 3.681, CI [1.378; 9.834] Univariate, relative risk estimation
Communication skills: limited understanding b (Individual survey) RR = 3.658, CI [1.571; 8.52] Univariate, relative risk estimation
Adaptive behaviour: no daytime engagement b (Individual survey) RR = 3.729, CI [1.48; 9.392] Univariate, relative risk estimation
Living situation: paid care (Individual survey) + RR = 3.023, CI [1.131; 8.079] Univariate, relative risk estimation
Living situation: with partner (Individual survey) NS RR = 0.301, CI [0.017; 5.202] Univariate, relative risk estimation
Psychiatric diagnosis: ASD (Individual survey) NS RR = 1.208, CI [0.454; 3.218] Univariate, relative risk estimation
Psychiatric diagnosis: any (Individual survey) NS RR = 2.256, CI [0.976; 5.212] Univariate, relative risk estimation
Aggressive behaviour: general (BPI‐S) + ρ = .253 Univariate, Spearman corerlation
Aggressive behaviour in general (BPI‐S) Aggressive behaviour: self‐injurious (BPI‐S) + ρ = .253 Univariate, Spearman corerlation
Communication skills: limited understanding b (Individual survey) RR = 3.882, CI [1.761; 8.559] Univariate, relative risk estimation
Communication skills: non‐verbal b (Individual survey) RR = 3.04, CI [1.372; 6.735] Univariate, relative risk estimation
Communication skills: no clear speech b (Individual survey) NS RR = 2.147, CI [0.932; 4.945] Univariate, relative risk estimation
Adaptive behaviour: no daytime engagement b (Individual survey) NS RR = 1.918, CI [0.86; 4.276] Univariate, relative risk estimation
Living situation: paid care (Individual survey) NS RR = 2.159, CI [0.91; 5.124] Univariate, relative risk estimation
Living situation: with partner (Individual survey) NS RR = 0.271, CI [0.016; 4.67] Univariate, relative risk estimation
Psychiatric diagnosis: any (Individual survey) NS RR = 1.034, CI [0.421; 2.537] Univariate, relative risk estimation
Psychiatric diagnosis: ASD (Individual survey) + RR = 3.383, CI [1.544; 7.414] Univariate, relative risk estimation

Cervantes and Matson (2015), USA

High quality

n = 307 adults (156M, 151F) with severe or profound intellectual disability, residing in developmental centres (M age = 51.44, SD = 12.49, range 20–88) Informant reports by care staff Sexually aggressive behaviour (DASH‐II) Psychiatric diagnosis: ASD (DSM−5, case file) + F(1, 303) = 10.87 Multivariate, ANCOVA
Self‐injurious behaviour (DASH‐II) Psychiatric diagnosis: ASD (DSM‐5, case file) + F(1, 303) = 13.73 Multivariate, ANCOVA

Clark et al. (2016), Canada

High quality

n = 215 adults with mild or moderate intellectual disability who (had) received services, living in different settings (M age = 39.90, SD = 11.87, range 18–65). Participants had to be able to understand English or French Retrospective chart review + informant reports by case managers and persons well known to participants Aggressive behaviour in general (MOAS) Life events: victimization history (TESI, informant reports) + Path coefficient = 0.99, SE = 0.48, T = 2.05 Multivariate, bootstrapped simple mediation analysis
Psychiatric symptoms: total mental health problems (RSMB) + Path coefficient = 0.27, SE = 0.04, T = 6.03 Multivariate, bootstrapped simple mediation analysis
Psychiatric symptoms: psychosis (RSMB) + Path coefficient = 0.86, SE = 0.23, T = 3.70 Multivariate, bootstrapped multiple mediation analysis
Psychiatric symptoms: personality disorder (RSMB) + Path coefficient = 0.65, SE = 0.23, T = 2.74 Multivariate, bootstrapped multiple mediation analysis
Psychiatric symptoms: depression (RSMB) NS Path coefficient = −0.37, SE = 0.27, T = −1.35 Multivariate, bootstrapped multiple mediation analysis
Self‐injurious behaviour (MOAS) Life events: victimization history (TESI, informant reports) + t(213) = −2.05 Univariate, t test
Psychiatric symptoms: total mental health problems (RSMB) + Not reported Multivariate, bootstrapped simple mediation analysis
Psychiatric symptoms: depression (RSMB) + r = .19 Univariate, Pearson correlation
Psychiatric symptoms: psychosis (RSMB) + r = .25 Univariate, Pearson correlation
Psychiatric symptoms: personality disorder (RSMB) + r = .28 Univariate, Pearson correlation

Crocker et al. (2006), Canada

Low quality

n = 3,165 adults (1,633M, 1,527F) with mild, moderate, severe, or profound intellectual disability receiving services and living in different settings (M age = 40.63, SD = 13) Informant reports by case managers and educators Physically aggressive behaviour (MOAS) Living situation: family (informant survey) NS Not reported Univariate, χ 2‐test
Living situation: family‐type residence (informant survey) NS Not reported Univariate, χ 2‐test
Living situation: group home (informant survey) NS Not reported Univariate, χ 2‐test
Living situation: apartment (informant survey) NS Not reported Univariate, χ 2‐test
Living situation: other (informant survey) + Not reported Univariate, χ 2‐test
Criminal behaviour: history of arrest (informant survey: rated as either present or absent) + Not reported Univariate, χ 2‐test
Aggressive behaviour: verbal (MOAS) + ρ = .53 Univariate, Spearman correlation
Aggressive behaviour: destructive (MOAS) + ρ = .59 Univariate, Spearman correlation
Aggressive behaviour: sexual (MOAS) + ρ = .20 Univariate, Spearman correlation
Aggressive behaviour: self‐injurious (MOAS) + ρ = .35 Univariate, Spearman correlation
Verbally aggressive behaviour (MOAS) Living situation: family (informant survey) NS Not reported Univariate, χ 2‐test
Living situation: family‐type residence (informant survey) NS Not reported Univariate, χ 2‐test
Living situation: group home (informant survey) NS Not reported Univariate, χ 2‐test
Living situation: apartment (informant survey) NS Not reported Univariate, χ 2‐test
Living situation: other (informant survey) + Not reported Univariate, χ 2‐test
Criminal behaviour: history of arrest (informant survey: rated as either present or absent) + Not reported Univariate, χ 2‐test
Aggressive behaviour: physical (MOAS) + ρ = .53 Univariate, Spearman correlation
Aggressive behaviour: destructive (MOAS) + ρ = .54 Univariate, Spearman correlation
Aggressive behaviour: sexual (MOAS) + ρ = .21 Univariate, Spearman correlation
Aggressive behaviour: self‐injurious (MOAS) + ρ = .26 Univariate, Spearman correlation
Destructive behaviour (MOAS) Living situation: family (informant survey) NS Not reported Univariate, χ 2‐test
Living situation: family‐type residence (informant survey) NS Not reported Univariate, χ 2‐test
Living situation: group home (informant survey) NS Not reported Univariate, χ 2‐test
Living situation: apartment (informant survey) NS Not reported Univariate, χ 2‐test
Living situation: other (informant survey) + Not reported Univariate, χ 2‐test
Criminal behaviour: history of arrest (informant survey: rated as either present or absent) + Not reported Univariate, χ 2‐test
Aggressive behaviour: physical (MOAS) + ρ = .59 Univariate, Spearman correlation
Aggressive behaviour: verbal (MOAS) + ρ = .54 Univariate, Spearman correlation
Aggressive behaviour: sexual (MOAS) + ρ = .19 Univariate, Spearman correlation
Aggressive behaviour: self‐injurious (MOAS) + ρ = .38 Univariate, Spearman correlation
Sexually aggressive behaviour (MOAS) Living situation: family (informant survey) NS Not reported Univariate, χ 2‐test
Living situation: family‐type residence (informant survey) NS Not reported Univariate, χ 2‐test
Living situation: group home (informant survey) NS Not reported Univariate, χ 2‐test
Living situation: apartment (informant survey) NS Not reported Univariate, χ 2‐test
Living situation: other (informant survey) + Not reported Univariate, χ 2‐test
Criminal behaviour: history of arrest (informant survey: rated as either present or absent) + Not reported Univariate, χ 2‐test
Aggressive behaviour: physical (MOAS) + ρ = .20 Univariate, Spearman correlation
Aggressive behaviour: verbal (MOAS) + ρ = .21 Univariate, Spearman correlation
Aggressive behaviour: destructive (MOAS) + ρ = .19 Univariate, Spearman correlation
Aggressive behaviour: self‐injurious (MOAS) + ρ = .13 Univariate, Spearman correlation
Self‐injurious behaviour (MOAS) Living situation: family (informant survey) NS Not reported Univariate, χ 2‐test
Living situation: family‐type residence (informant survey) NS Not reported Univariate, χ 2‐test
Living situation: group home (informant survey) NS Not reported Univariate, χ 2‐test
Living situation: apartment (informant survey) NS Not reported Univariate, χ 2‐test
Living situation: other (informant survey) + Not reported Univariate, χ 2‐test
Criminal behaviour: history of arrest (informant survey: rated as either present or absent) NS Not reported Univariate, χ 2‐test
Aggressive behaviour: physical (MOAS) + ρ = .35 Univariate, Spearman correlation
Aggressive behaviour: verbal (MOAS) + ρ = .26 Univariate, Spearman correlation
Aggressive behaviour: destructive (MOAS) + ρ = .38 Univariate, Spearman correlation
Aggressive behaviour: sexual (MOAS) + ρ = .13 Univariate, Spearman correlation
Aggressive behaviour in general (MOAS) Living situation: family (informant survey) NS Not reported Univariate, χ 2‐test
Living situation: family‐type residence (informant survey) NS Not reported Univariate, χ 2‐test
Living situation: group home (informant survey) NS Not reported Univariate, χ 2‐test
Living situation: apartment (informant survey) NS Not reported Univariate, χ 2‐test
Living situation: other (informant survey) + Not reported Univariate, χ 2‐test
Criminal behaviour: history of arrest (informant survey: rated as either present or absent) + t(137.91) = −5.84 Univariate, t test

Crocker et al. (2014), Canada

High quality

n = 296 adults (162M, 134F) with mild or moderate intellectual disability living in the community and receiving services (M age = 40.67, SD = 12.21, range 18–65). Participants had to be able to understand English or French Retrospective chart review + self‐reports + informant reports by a case manager and significant others Physically aggressive behaviour (MOAS) Psychiatric diagnosis: number of mental disorders (case file) NS Incidence rate ratio = 1.450, CI [0.980; 2.146] Multivariate, logistic regression
Psychiatric diagnosis: severity of mental disorders (SF‐36) NS Incidence rate ratio = 0.972, CI [0.936; 1.009] Multivariate, logistic regression
Verbally aggressive behaviour (MOAS) Psychiatric diagnosis: number of mental disorders (case file) + Incidence rate ratio = 3.200, CI [1.294; 7.914] Multivariate, logistic regression
Psychiatric diagnosis: severity of mental disorders (SF‐36) + Incidence rate ratio = 0.937, CI [0.890; 0.986] Multivariate, logistic regression
Destructive behaviour (MOAS) Psychiatric diagnosis: number of mental disorders (case file) NS Incidence rate ratio = 1.258, CI [0.849; 1.863] Multivariate, logistic regression
Psychiatric diagnosis: severity of mental disorders (SF‐36) Incidence rate ratio = 0.956, CI [0.920; 0.993] Multivariate, logistic regression
Sexually aggressive behaviour (MOAS) Psychiatric diagnosis: anxiety disorder (SF‐36, case file) + Incidence rate ratio = 3.224, CI [1.311; 7.923] Multivariate, logistic regression

Davies et al. (2015), UK

High quality

n = 96 adults (50M, 46F) with mild or moderate intellectual disability (M age = 39.68, SD = 13.32, range 18–79). Participants had to be able to complete the questionnaires Self‐reports + informant reports by carers Aggressive behaviour in general (CCB) Psychiatric symptoms: alexithymia (self‐report using AQC) NS ρ = .133 Univariate, Spearman correlation
Psychiatric symptoms: alexithymia (informant report using OAS) + ρ = .298 Univariate, Spearman correlation

Didden et al. (2009), the Netherlands

Low quality

n = 39 adult inpatients of a specialized treatment unit, with mild intellectual disability (age range 19–51) Retrospective chart review Aggressive behaviour in general (ABCL) Psychiatric symptoms: substance abuse (case file: use of much more than 14 (females) or 21 (males) standard units of alcohol per week, with similar criteria for drug use) + z = 2.187 Univariate, Mann–Whitney analysis

Drieschner et al. (2013), the Netherlands

Low quality

n = 218 adults (188M, 30F) with mild intellectual disability, living in residential treatment centres for adults with intellectual disability who display serious dangerous behaviour (M age = 33.8, SD = 11.5) Informant reports Physically aggressive behaviour (MOAS+) Aggressive behaviour: verbal (MOAS+) + ρ = .70 Univariate, Spearman correlation
Aggressive behaviour: destructive (MOAS+) + ρ = .73 Univariate, Spearman correlation
Aggressive behaviour: sexual (MOAS+) + ρ = .30 Univariate, Spearman correlation
Aggressive behaviour: self‐injurious (MOAS+) + ρ = .47 Univariate, Spearman correlation
Psychiatric diagnosis: ADHD (DSM‐IV) + Incidence rate ratio = 2.53 Univariate, Mann–Whitney U‐test
Psychiatric diagnosis: Borderline personality disorder (DSM‐IV) NS Not reported Univariate, Mann–Whitney U‐test
Psychiatric diagnosis: substance‐related disorder (DSM‐IV) NS Not reported Univariate, Mann–Whitney U‐test
Psychiatric diagnosis: psychotic disorder (DSM‐IV) NS Not reported Univariate, Mann–Whitney U‐test
Psychiatric diagnosis: mood or anxiety disorder (DSM‐IV) NS Not reported Univariate, Mann–Whitney U‐test
Psychiatric diagnosis: PDD (DSM‐IV) NS Not reported Univariate, Mann–Whitney U‐test
Psychiatric diagnosis: paraphilia (DSM‐IV) NS Not reported Univariate, Mann–Whitney U‐test
Psychiatric diagnosis: antisocial personality disorder (DSM‐IV) NS Not reported Univariate, Mann–Whitney U‐test
Criminal behaviour: admission on the basis of criminal law (informant reports) Incidence rate ratio = −1.86 Univariate, Mann–Whitney U‐test
Verbally aggressive behaviour (MOAS+) Aggressive behaviour: physical (MOAS+) + ρ = .70 Univariate, Spearman correlation
Aggressive behaviour: destructive (MOAS+) + ρ = .80 Univariate, Spearman correlation
Aggressive behaviour: sexual (MOAS+) + ρ = .35 Univariate, Spearman correlation
Aggressive behaviour: self‐injurious (MOAS+) + ρ = .39 Univariate, Spearman correlation
Psychiatric diagnosis: ADHD (DSM‐IV) + Incidence rate ratio = 1.88 Univariate, Mann–Whitney U‐test
Psychiatric diagnosis: Borderline personality disorder (DSM‐IV) NS Not reported Univariate, Mann–Whitney U‐test
Psychiatric diagnosis: substance‐related disorder (DSM‐IV) NS Not reported Univariate, Mann–Whitney U‐test
Psychiatric diagnosis: psychotic disorder (DSM‐IV) NS Not reported Univariate, Mann–Whitney U‐test
Psychiatric diagnosis: mood or anxiety disorder (DSM‐IV) NS Not reported Univariate, Mann–Whitney U‐test
Psychiatric diagnosis: PDD (DSM‐IV) NS Not reported Univariate, Mann–Whitney U‐test
Psychiatric diagnosis: paraphilia (DSM‐IV) NS Not reported Univariate, Mann–Whitney U‐test
Psychiatric diagnosis: antisocial personality disorder (DSM‐IV) NS Not reported Univariate, Mann–Whitney U‐test
Criminal behaviour: admission on the basis of criminal law (informant reports) Incidence rate ratio = −1.59 Univariate, Mann–Whitney U‐test
Destructive behaviour (MOAS+) Aggressive behaviour: physical (MOAS+) + ρ = .73 Univariate, Spearman correlation
Aggressive behaviour: verbal (MOAS+) + ρ = .80 Univariate, Spearman correlation
Aggressive behaviour: sexual (MOAS+) + ρ = .29 Univariate, Spearman correlation
Aggressive behaviour: self‐injurious (MOAS+) + ρ = .50 Univariate, Spearman correlation
Psychiatric diagnosis: ADHD (DSM‐IV) + Incidence rate ratio = 2.75 Univariate, Mann–Whitney U‐test
Psychiatric diagnosis: Borderline personality disorder (DSM‐IV) NS Not reported Univariate, Mann–Whitney U‐test
Psychiatric diagnosis: substance‐related disorder (DSM‐IV) Incidence rate ratio = −1.67 Univariate, Mann–Whitney U‐test
Psychiatric diagnosis: psychotic disorder (DSM‐IV) NS Not reported Univariate, Mann–Whitney U‐test
Psychiatric diagnosis: mood or anxiety disorder (DSM‐IV) NS Not reported Univariate, Mann–Whitney U‐test
Psychiatric diagnosis: PDD (DSM‐IV) NS Not reported Univariate, Mann–Whitney U‐test
Psychiatric diagnosis: paraphilia (DSM‐IV) NS Not reported Univariate, Mann–Whitney U‐test
Psychiatric diagnosis: antisocial personality disorder (DSM‐IV) NS Not reported Univariate, Mann–Whitney U‐test
Criminal behaviour: admission on the basis of criminal law (informant reports) Incidence rate ratio = −2.06 Univariate, Mann–Whitney U‐test
Sexually aggressive behaviour (MOAS+) Aggressive behaviour: physical (MOAS+) + ρ = .30 Univariate, Spearman correlation
Aggressive behaviour: verbal (MOAS+) + ρ = .35 Univariate, Spearman correlation
Aggressive behaviour: destructive (MOAS+) + ρ = .29 Univariate, Spearman correlation
Aggressive behaviour: self‐injurious (MOAS+) + ρ = .24 Univariate, Spearman correlation
Psychiatric diagnosis: ADHD (DSM‐IV) + Incidence rate ratio = 3.08 Univariate, Mann–Whitney U‐test
Psychiatric diagnosis: Borderline personality disorder (DSM‐IV) NS Not reported Univariate, Mann–Whitney U‐test
Psychiatric diagnosis: substance‐related disorder (DSM‐IV) Incidence rate ratio = −1.45 Univariate, Mann–Whitney U‐test
Psychiatric diagnosis: psychotic disorder (DSM‐IV) NS Not reported Univariate, Mann–Whitney U‐test
Psychiatric diagnosis: mood or anxiety disorder (DSM‐IV) NS Not reported Univariate, Mann–Whitney U‐test
Psychiatric diagnosis: PDD (DSM‐IV) NS Not reported Univariate, Mann–Whitney U‐test
Psychiatric diagnosis: paraphilia (DSM‐IV) NS Not reported Univariate, Mann–Whitney U‐test
Psychiatric diagnosis: antisocial personality disorder (DSM‐IV) NS Not reported Univariate, Mann–Whitney U‐test
Criminal behaviour: admission on the basis of criminal law (informant reports) NS Not reported Univariate, Mann–Whitney U‐test
Self‐injurious behaviour (MOAS+) Aggressive behaviour: physical (MOAS+) + ρ = .47 Univariate, Spearman correlation
Aggressive behaviour: verbal (MOAS+) + ρ = .39 Univariate, Spearman correlation
Aggressive behaviour: destructive (MOAS+) + ρ = .50 Univariate, Spearman correlation
Aggressive behaviour: sexual (MOAS+) + ρ = .24 Univariate, Spearman correlation
Psychiatric diagnosis: ADHD (DSM‐IV) + Incidence rate ratio = 5.71 Univariate, Mann–Whitney U‐test
Psychiatric diagnosis: borderline personality disorder (DSM‐IV) + Incidence rate ratio = 4.29 Univariate, Mann–Whitney U‐test
Psychiatric diagnosis: substance‐related disorder (DSM‐IV) NS Not reported Univariate, Mann–Whitney U‐test
Psychiatric diagnosis: psychotic disorder (DSM‐IV) NS Not reported Univariate, Mann–Whitney U‐test
Psychiatric diagnosis: mood or anxiety disorder (DSM‐IV) NS Not reported Univariate, Mann–Whitney U‐test
Psychiatric diagnosis: PDD (DSM‐IV) NS Not reported Univariate, Mann–Whitney U‐test
Psychiatric diagnosis: paraphilia (DSM‐IV) NS Not reported Univariate, Mann–Whitney U‐test
Psychiatric diagnosis: antisocial personality disorder (DSM‐IV) NS Not reported Univariate, Mann–Whitney U‐test
Criminal behaviour: admission on the basis of criminal law (informant reports) Incidence rate ratio = −2.85 Univariate, Mann–Whitney U‐test
Aggressive behaviour in general (MOAS+) Psychiatric diagnosis: ADHD (DSM‐IV) + Incidence rate ratio = 2.28 Univariate, Mann–Whitney U‐test
Psychiatric diagnosis: Borderline personality disorder (DSM‐IV) NS Not reported Univariate, Mann–Whitney U‐test
Psychiatric diagnosis: substance‐related disorder (DSM‐IV) Incidence rate ratio = −1.57 Univariate, Mann–Whitney U‐test
Psychiatric diagnosis: psychotic disorder (DSM‐IV) NS Not reported Univariate, Mann–Whitney U‐test
Psychiatric diagnosis: mood or anxiety disorder (DSM‐IV) NS Not reported Univariate, Mann–Whitney U‐test
Psychiatric diagnosis: PDD (DSM‐IV) NS Not reported Univariate, Mann–Whitney U‐test
Psychiatric diagnosis: paraphilia (DSM‐IV) NS Not reported Univariate, Mann–Whitney U‐test
Psychiatric diagnosis: antisocial personality disorder (DSM‐IV) NS Not reported Univariate, Mann–Whitney U‐test
Criminal behaviour: admission on the basis of criminal law (informant reports) Incidence rate ratio = −1.70 Univariate, Mann–Whitney U‐test

Esbensen and Benson (2006), USA

High quality

n = 104 adults (58M, 46F) with mild, moderate, or severe intellectual disability (M age = 42.0, SD = 12.4, range 21–79 years) and living in different settings Informant reports by care staff Aggressive behaviour in general (SIB‐R externalized) Life events: positive life events (LES) NS r = .05 Univariate, Pearson correlation
Life events: negative life events (LES) + r = .39 Univariate, Pearson correlation
Life events: total life events (LES) + r = .24 Univariate, Pearson correlation

Hartley and MacLean (2007), USA

High quality

n = 132 adults ≥50 years (66M, 66F, M age = 59.22, SD = 7.60), with mild, moderate, severe, or profound intellectual disability receiving services and living in different settings Informant reports by care staff Physically aggressive behaviour (ICAP) Adaptive behaviour: motor skills, social and communication skills, personal living skills, community living skills (ICAP Broad Independence age equivalent) τ = −.32 Univariate, Kendall Tau C correlation
Destructive behaviour (ICAP) Adaptive behaviour: motor skills, social and communication skills, personal living skills, community living skills (ICAP Broad Independence age equivalent) τ = −.29 Univariate, Kendall Tau C correlation

Hemmings et al. (2006), UK

High quality

n = 214 adults (108M, 106F) with mild/moderate or severe/profound intellectual disability (range 18–85 years), living in a variety of settings Retrospective chart review + self‐reports Destructive behaviour (DAS) Psychiatric symptoms: low energy (PAS‐ADD Checklist) + OR = 4.36, CI [1.43; 13.3] Multivariate, stepwise logistic regression
Psychiatric symptoms: delayed sleep (PAS‐ADD Checklist) + OR = 3.28, CI [1.1; 9.76] Multivariate, stepwise logistic regression
Psychiatric symptoms: anhedonia, sad or down, fearful/panicky, repetitive actions, too high or happy, suicidal, loss of appetite, weight change, loss of confidence, avoiding social contact, worthlessness, early waking, restlessness, irritable mood, loss of self‐care, odd language (PAS‐ADD Checklist) NS Not reported Multivariate, stepwise logistic regression
Social skills: social functioning (DAS) OR = 4.09, CI [1.7; 9.82] Multivariate, stepwise logistic regression
Self‐injurious behaviour (DAS) Psychiatric symptoms: irritable mood (PAS‐ADD Checklist) + OR = 5.52, CI [1.99; 15.3] Multivariate, stepwise logistic regression
Psychiatric symptoms: suicidal (PAS‐ADD Checklist) + OR = 5.19, CI [1.22; 22.1] Multivariate, stepwise logistic regression
Psychiatric symptoms: low energy, anhedonia, sad or down, fearful/panicky, repetitive actions, too high or happy, loss of appetite, weight change, loss of confidence, avoiding social contact, worthlessness, delayed sleep, early waking, restlessness, loss of self‐care, odd language (PAS‐ADD Checklist) NS Not reported Multivariate, stepwise logistic regression
Social skills: social functioning (DAS) NS Not reported Multivariate, stepwise logistic regression
Aggressive behaviour in general (DAS) Psychiatric symptoms: early waking (PAS‐ADD Checklist) + OR = 4.04, CI [1.08; 15.1] Multivariate, stepwise logistic regression
Psychiatric symptoms: low energy (PAS‐ADD Checklist) + OR = 3.72, CI [1.21; 11.4] Multivariate, stepwise logistic regression
Psychiatric symptoms: irritable mood (PAS‐ADD Checklist) + OR = 3.0, CI [1.16; 7.8] Multivariate, stepwise logistic regression
Psychiatric symptoms: anhedonia, sad or down, fearful/panicky, repetitive actions, too high or happy, suicidal, loss of appetite, weight change, loss of confidence, avoiding social contact, worthlessness, delayed sleep, restlessness, loss of self‐care, odd language (PAS‐ADD Checklist) NS Not reported Multivariate, stepwise logistic regression
Social skills: social functioning (DAS) NS Not reported Multivariate, stepwise logistic regression

Horovitz et al. (2013), USA

High quality

n = 175 adults (94M, 81F) with mild, moderate, severe, or profound intellectual disability residing in developmental centres (M age = 52.18, SD = 13.41, range 20–87 years) Informant reports by care staff Self‐injurious behaviour (ASD‐BPA) Psychiatric diagnosis: ASD (DSM‐IV‐TR and ICD‐10) + F(1, 170) = 11.28 Multivariate, two‐way between‐subjects ANOVA
Aggressive behaviour in general (ASD‐BPA) Psychiatric diagnosis: ASD (DSM‐IV‐TR and ICD‐10) NS F(1, 170) = 2.11 Multivariate, two‐way between‐subjects ANOVA

Hurley (2008), USA

Low quality

n = 300 patients with mild, moderate, severe, or profound intellectual disability seen in a specialty clinic of a medical centre Retrospective chart review Self‐injurious behaviour (case file: any form of self‐injurious behaviour, excluding suicidality but including skin picking) Psychiatric diagnosis: depression (DSM‐IV, DSM‐IV‐TR diagnosis derived from case file) + OR = 8.53, CI [1.09; 66.75] Univariate, odds ratio a
Aggressive behaviour in general (case file: any physical aggression towards others, objects, or verbal threats of aggression) Psychiatric diagnosis: depression (DSM‐IV, DSM‐IV‐TR diagnosis derived from case file) + OR = 21.02, CI [2.73; 162.09] Univariate, odds ratio a

Koritsas and Iacono (2015), Australia

High quality

n = 74 adults (49M, 25F) with intellectual disability (M age = 36.56, SD = 13.14, range 19–73 years) and living in different settings Informant reports by care staff + brief observation Aggressive behaviour in general (Interview Protocol, ICAP, CCB) Psychiatric symptoms: anxiety (DBC‐A) + β = 0.52, SE = 0.06, t = 4.16 Multivariate, multiple regression
Psychiatric symptoms: disruption (DBC‐A) + ρ = .28 Univariate, Spearman correlation
Psychiatric symptoms: total (DBC‐A) + ρ = .24 Univariate, Spearman correlation
Psychiatric symptoms: depressive (DBC‐A) NS β = −0.16, SE = 0.03, t = −1.36 Multivariate, multiple regression
Psychiatric symptoms: self‐absorbed (DBC‐A) NS ρ = .19 Univariate, Spearman correlation
Psychiatric symptoms: communication disturbance (DBC‐A) NS ρ = .12 Univariate, Spearman correlation
Psychiatric symptoms: social relating (DBC‐A) NS ρ = .02 Univariate, Spearman correlation
Communication skills: ability to make needs known (informant report about communication forms and functions, combined with brief observations. Overall judgment of communication skills was determined by a speech pathologist based on these instruments) NS ρ = .06 Univariate, Spearman correlation
Living situation: with parents (compared to not living with parents) (questionnaire) NS ρ = .14 Univariate, Spearman correlation
Aggressive behaviour: learned function of aggressive behaviour (sensory) (MAS) NS β = −0.22, SE = 0.02, t = −1.78 Multivariate, multiple regression
Aggressive behaviour: learned function of aggressive behaviour (escape) (MAS) NS β = −0.06, SE = 0.03, t = 0.41 Multivariate, multiple regression
Aggressive behaviour: learned function of aggressive behaviour (attention) (MAS) NS β = 0.14, SE = 0.03, t = −0.32 Multivariate, multiple regression
Aggressive behaviour: learned function of aggressive behaviour (tangible) (MAS) NS ρ = .18 Univariate, Spearman correlation

Larson et al. (2011), UK

Low quality

n = 60 adults (31M, 29F) with mild or moderate intellectual disability, that had to be able to read and respond to the questionnaire independently;

n = 39 supporting persons

Informant reports by supporting persons + self‐reports Aggressive behaviour in general (questionnaire: not specified, challenging behaviour selected from a list of commonly occurring examples of challenging behaviour) Psychiatric symptoms: attachment style (questionnaire: secure, insecure‐anxious/ambivalent, or insecure‐avoidant) NS Not reported Univariate, χ 2‐test
Self‐injurious behaviour (questionnaire: behaviour not specified, challenging behaviour selected from a list of commonly occurring examples of challenging behaviour) Psychiatric symptoms: attachment style (questionnaire: secure, insecure‐anxious/ambivalent, or insecure‐avoidant) NS Not reported Univariate, χ 2‐test

Lindsay et al. (2013), UK

Low quality

n = 477 adults referred to maximum secure services for antisocial or offending behaviour Retrospective chart review Physically aggressive behaviour (case file: behaviour leading to referral to maximum secure services Psychiatric diagnosis: ADHD (case file) + OR = 1.76, CI [1.06; 2.93] Univariate, odds ratio a
Verbally aggressive behaviour (case file: behaviour leading to referral to maximum secure services) Psychiatric diagnosis: ADHD (case file) NS OR = 0.85, CI [0.49; 1.46] Univariate, odds ratio a
Destructive behaviour (case file: behaviour leading to referral to maximum secure services) Psychiatric diagnosis: ADHD (case file) + OR = 1.77, CI [1.00; 3.14] Univariate, odds ratio a
Sexually aggressive behaviour (case file: behaviour leading to referral to maximum secure services) Psychiatric diagnosis: ADHD (case file) NS

Contact sex

OR = 0.81, CI [0.38; 1.71]

Non‐contact sex

OR = 0.72, CI [0.33; 1.58]

Univariate, odds ratio a

Lundqvist (2013), Sweden

Low quality

n = 915 adults (504M, 411F) with mild, moderate, or severe/profound intellectual disability receiving care from local health authorities and living in different settings (M age = 43.4, SD = 14.8, range 18–87 years) Informant reports by care staff Self‐injurious behaviour (BPI) Psychiatric symptoms: autism (questionnaire based on the ICF) + OR = 1.70, CI [1.03; 2.80] Multivariate, backward stepwise likelihood ratio multiple logistic regression
Psychiatric symptoms: schizophrenia (questionnaire based on the ICF) NS OR = 1.61, CI [0.51; 5.13] Univariate, binary logistic regression
Psychiatric symptoms: psychosis (questionnaire based on the ICF) NS OR = 0.00, CI not reported Univariate, binary logistic regression
Psychiatric symptoms: depression (questionnaire based on the ICF) NS OR = 0.28, CI [0.03; 2.22] Univariate, binary logistic regression
Psychiatric symptoms: OCD (questionnaire based on the ICF) NS OR = 0.64, CI [0.13; 3.08] Univariate, binary logistic regression
Psychiatric symptoms: ADHD (questionnaire based on the ICF) NS Not reported Multivariate, backward stepwise likelihood ratio multiple logistic regression
Psychiatric symptoms: general psychopathology (questionnaire based on the ICF) NS Not reported Multivariate, backward stepwise likelihood ratio multiple logistic regression
Communication skills: communicating in writing (questionnaire based on the ICF) NS Not reported Multivariate, backward stepwise likelihood ratio multiple logistic regression
Communication skills: communicating with speech (questionnaire based on the ICF) NS Not reported Multivariate, backward stepwise likelihood ratio multiple logistic regression
Communication skills: communicating with signs (questionnaire based on the ICF) NS Not reported Multivariate, backward stepwise likelihood ratio multiple logistic regression
Communication skills: communicating with gestures (questionnaire based on the ICF) NS Not reported Multivariate, backward stepwise likelihood ratio multiple logistic regression
Communication skills: communicating with sounds (questionnaire based on the ICF) NS Not reported Multivariate, backward stepwise likelihood ratio multiple logistic regression
Communication skills: communicating with pictures (questionnaire based on the ICF) + OR = 1.93, CI [1.21; 3.09] Multivariate, backward stepwise likelihood ratio multiple logistic regression
Social skills: group functioning (questionnaire based on the ICF) NS Not reported Multivariate, backward stepwise likelihood ratio multiple logistic regression
Social skills: initiating social interaction (questionnaire based on the ICF, rated on a five‐point scale from never to always) NS Not reported Multivariate, backward stepwise likelihood ratio multiple logistic regression
Aggressive behaviour in general (BPI) Psychiatric symptoms: autism (questionnaire based on the ICF) + OR = 1.78, CI [1.14; 2.77] Multivariate, backward stepwise likelihood ratio multiple logistic regression
Psychiatric symptoms: schizophrenia (questionnaire based on the ICF) NS OR = 1.92, CI [0.62; 6.01] Univariate, binary logistic regression
Psychiatric symptoms: psychosis (questionnaire based on the ICF) NS OR = 2.40, CI [0.64; 9.01] Univariate, binary logistic regression
Psychiatric symptoms: depression (questionnaire based on the ICF) NS OR = 2.40, CI [0.64; 9.01] Univariate, binary logistic regression
Psychiatric symptoms: OCD (questionnaire based on the ICF) NS OR = 0.96, CI [0.24; 3.85] Univariate, binary logistic regression
Psychiatric symptoms: ADHD (questionnaire based on the ICF) NS OR = 1.15, CI [0.55; 2.38] Univariate, binary logistic regression
Psychiatric symptoms: general psychopathology (questionnaire based on the ICF) NS Not reported Multivariate, backward stepwise likelihood ratio multiple logistic regression
Communication skills: communicating in writing (questionnaire based on the ICF) NS OR = 1.12, CI [0.79; 1.58] Univariate, binary logistic regression
Communication skills: communicating with speech (questionnaire based on the ICF) NS Not reported Multivariate, backward stepwise likelihood ratio multiple logistic regression
Communication skills: communicating with signs (questionnaire based on the ICF) + OR = 2.28, CI [1.49; 3.49] Multivariate, backward stepwise likelihood ratio multiple logistic regression
Communication skills: communicating with gestures (questionnaire based on the ICF) NS Not reported Multivariate, backward stepwise likelihood ratio multiple logistic regression
Communication skills: communicating with sounds (questionnaire based on the ICF) NS Not reported Multivariate, backward stepwise likelihood ratio multiple logistic regression
Communication skills: communicating with pictures (questionnaire based on the ICF) NS Not reported Multivariate, backward stepwise likelihood ratio multiple logistic regression
Social skills: group functioning (questionnaire based on the ICF) OR = 0.54, CI [0.46; 0.64] Multivariate, backward stepwise likelihood ratio multiple logistic regression
Social skills: initiating social interaction (questionnaire based on the ICF, rated on a five‐point scale from never to always) + OR = 1.27, CI [1.10; 1.48] Multivariate, backward stepwise likelihood ratio multiple logistic regression

Lunsky et al. (2012), Canada

Low quality

n = 747 adults with mild or moderate/severe intellectual disability that have experienced crisis and living in different settings Retrospective chart review + informant reports by care staff Physically aggressive behaviour (case file, informant report: written description of what led up to the crisis, the crisis itself and the outcome of the crisis) Criminal behaviour: history of legal involvement (case file) NS b = −0.247, OR = 0.781, CI [0.477; 1.280] Multivariate, logistic regressions
Psychiatric diagnosis: autism (case file) NS b = −0.329, OR = 0.720, CI [0.479; 1.081] Multivariate, logistic regressions
Psychiatric diagnosis: substance abuse disorder (case file) NS b = −0.714, OR = 0.490, CI [0.124; 1.930] Multivariate, logistic regressions
Living situation: minimal support (compared to group home) (case file) b = −0.617, OR = 0.540, CI [0.337; 0.864] Multivariate, logistic regressions
Living situation: with family (compared to group home) (case file) NS b = −0.245, OR = 0.783, CI [0.496; 1.235] Multivariate, logistic regressions
Life events: negative life events (modified PAS‐ADD Checklist) NS

One life event

b = 0.010, OR = 1.010, CI [0.645; 1.583]

Two or more life events

b = 0.098, OR = 1.103, CI [0.719; 1.693]

Multivariate, logistic regressions
Destructive behaviour (case file, informant report: written description of what led up to the crisis, the crisis itself and the outcome of the crisis) Criminal behaviour: history of legal involvement (case file) + χ 2(1) = 6.428 Univariate, χ 2‐test
Self‐injurious behaviour (case file, informant report: written description of what led up to the crisis, the crisis itself and the outcome of the crisis) Criminal behaviour: history of legal involvement (case file) + χ 2(1) = 5.966 Univariate, χ 2‐test

Matson and Rivet (2008), USA

High quality

n = 298 adults (167M, 131F) with mild, moderate, severe, or profound intellectual disability residing in a developmental centre (M age = 52.03, SD = 12.78, range 21–88 years) Informant reports by care staff Self‐injurious behaviour (ASD‐BPA) Psychiatric symptoms: restricted/repetitive behaviour (ASD‐DA) + B = 0.11, SE = 0.03, β = 0.32 Multivariate, multiple regression
Psychiatric symptoms: social impairment (ASD‐DA) NS B = 0.02, SE = 0.02, β = 0.10 Multivariate, multiple regression
Psychiatric symptoms: communication impairment (ASD‐DA) NS B = −0.03, SE = 0.03, β = −0.09 Multivariate, multiple regression
Aggressive behaviour in general (ASD‐BPA) Psychiatric symptoms: communication impairment (ASD‐DA) + B = −0.13, SE = 0.06, β = −0.21 Multivariate, multiple regression
Psychiatric symptoms: social impairment (ASD‐DA) NS B = 0.05, SE = 0.03, β = 0.18 Multivariate, multiple regression
Psychiatric symptoms: restricted/repetitive behaviour (ASD‐DA) NS B = 0.05, SE = 0.06, β = 0.09 Multivariate, multiple regression

Matson et al. (2009), USA

High quality

n = 257 adults (139M, 118F) with severe or profound intellectual disability, living in a developmental centre (M age = 49.78, SD = 11.83, range 20–81 years) Informant reports by care staff Self‐injurious behaviour (ASD‐BPA) Social skills: general positive social skills (MESSIER) B = −0.01, SE = 0.00, β = −0.54 Multivariate, multiple regression
Social skills: general negative social skills (MESSIER) NS B = 0.01, SE = 0.01, β = 0.20 Multivariate, multiple regression
Aggressive behaviour in general (ASD‐BPA) Social skills: general positive social skills (MESSIER)

B = −0.04, SE = 0.01,

β = −0.62

Multivariate, multiple regression
Social skills: general negative social skills (MESSIER) +

B = 0.11, SE = 0.03,

β = 0.61

Multivariate, multiple regression

Nøttestad and Linaker (2002), Norway

Low quality

n = 22 adults with mild, moderate, severe, or profound intellectual disability, displaying physically aggressive behaviour (M = 37, range 22–75)

n = 41 controls with intellectual disability (M age = 44, range 22–75 years) and living in different settings

Informant reports by caretakers Physically aggressive behaviour (caretaker reports: participant attacked people in the previous year) Aggressive behaviour: destructive (caretaker reports: attacks on objects/property in the previous year) + Not reported Univariate, Mann–Whitney U‐test
Aggressive behaviour: self‐injurious (caretaker reports: behaviour not specified) + Not reported Univariate, Mann–Whitney U‐test
Destructive behaviour (caretaker reports: attacks on property in the previous year) Aggressive behaviour: physical (caretaker reports) + Not reported Univariate, Mann–Whitney U‐test
Self‐injurious behaviour (caretaker reports: behaviour not specified) Aggressive behaviour: physical (caretaker reports: attacks on people in the previous year) + Not reported Univariate, Mann–Whitney U‐test

Novaco and Taylor (2004), UK

High quality

129 male adults with intellectual disability residing in a forensic service (M age = 33.2, SD = 11.6) Self‐reports + retrospective case review + informant ratings by staff Physically aggressive behaviour (case file: defined as an act that resulted in or could potentially have resulted in physical injury, displayed since admission) Personality type: psychoticism (EPQ‐R Short Scale) NS B = 0.0121, SE = 0.019, β = 0.064, t = 0.63 Multivariate, hierarchical regression
Personality type: neuroticism (EPQ‐R Short Scale) NS B = 0.0114, SE = 0.008, β = 0.132, t = 1.35 Multivariate, hierarchical regression
Personality type: lie (EPQ‐R Short Scale) NS B = −0.0122, SE = 0.010, β = −0.125, t = 1.28 Multivariate, hierarchical regression
Personality type: extraversion (EPQ‐R Short Scale) + B = 0.0245, SE = 0.010, β = 0.237, t = 2.55 Multivariate, hierarchical regression
Self‐reported anger (NAS, PI, STAXI State Anger) +

NAS

B = 0.0078, SE = 003, β = 0.381, t = 3.08

Multivariate, hierarchical regression
NS

PI

B = −0.0018, SE = 0.002, β = −0.085, t = 0.74

Multivariate, hierarchical regression
NS

STAXI

B = −0.0129, SE = 0.008, β = −0.150, t = 1.55

Multivariate, hierarchical regression

Owen et al. (2004), UK

Low quality

n = 93 adults (61M, 32F) with intellectual disability living in a long‐stay residential hospital (M age = 55.2, SD = 12.7, range 24–93 years) Informant reports by care staff Self‐injurious behaviour (BPI) Life events: negative life events (LEL) NS r(93) = .09 Univariate, Pearson correlation
Aggressive behaviour in general (BPI) Life events: negative life events (LEL) + r(88) = .27 Multivariate, Pearson partial correlation

Phillips and Rose (2010), UK

Low quality

n = 20 adults (15M, 5F) with mild intellectual disability and challenging behaviour experiencing placement breakdown (M age = 47.9, range 25.3–65.7 years)

n = 23 adults (17M, 6F) with mild intellectual disability and challenging behaviour, that did not experience placement breakdown (M age = 43.2, range 22.7–79.2 years). All participants were living in residential facilities

Informant reports by care staff Physically aggressive behaviour (DAS‐B) Life events: moves between community services (informant reports) NS OR = 1.19, CI [0.23; 6.11] Univariate, odds ratio a

Rojahn et al. (2004), USA

Low quality

n = 180 adults (97M, 83F) with mild, moderate, severe, or profound intellectual disability residing at a developmental centre (M age = 50.6, SD = 14.5, range 20–91 years) Informant reports by care staff Self‐injurious behaviour (BPI) Aggressive behaviour: general (BPI) + ρ = .25 Univariate, Spearman rank correlation
Psychiatric symptoms: mania (DASH‐II) + ρ = .18 Univariate, Spearman rank correlation
Psychiatric symptoms: PDD/autism (DASH‐II) + ρ = .19 Univariate, Spearman rank correlation
Psychiatric symptoms: stereotypies/tics (DASH‐II) + ρ = .19 Univariate, Spearman rank correlation
Psychiatric symptoms: organic syndromes (DASH‐II) + ρ = .24 Univariate, Spearman rank correlation
Psychiatric symptoms: impulse control (DASH‐II) + ρ = .17 Univariate, Spearman rank correlation
Psychiatric symptoms: self‐injurious behaviour (DASH‐II) + ρ = .27 Univariate, Spearman rank correlation
Psychiatric symptoms: eating disorder (DASH‐II) + ρ = .15 Univariate, Spearman rank correlation
Psychiatric symptoms: sexual disorder (DASH‐II) + ρ = .18 Univariate, Spearman rank correlation
Psychiatric symptoms: total (DASH‐II) + ρ = .27 Univariate, Spearman rank correlation
Psychiatric symptoms: anxiety (DASH‐II) NS Not reported Univariate, Spearman rank correlation
Psychiatric symptoms: schizophrenia (DASH‐II) NS Not reported Univariate, Spearman rank correlation
Psychiatric symptoms: elimination disorder (DASH‐II) NS Not reported Univariate, Spearman rank correlation
Psychiatric symptoms: sleep disorder (DASH‐II) NS Not reported Univariate, Spearman rank correlation
Aggressive behaviour in general (BPI) Aggressive behaviour: self‐injurious (BPI) + ρ = .25 Univariate, Spearman rank correlation
Psychiatric symptoms: total (DASH‐II) + ρ = .25 Univariate, Spearman rank correlation
Psychiatric symptoms: depression (DASH‐II) + ρ = .16 Univariate, Spearman rank correlation
Psychiatric symptoms: mania (DASH‐II) + ρ = .20 Univariate, Spearman rank correlation
Psychiatric symptoms: impulse control (DASH‐II) + ρ = .33 Univariate, Spearman rank correlation
Psychiatric symptoms: self‐injurious behaviour (DASH‐II) + ρ = .25 Univariate, Spearman rank correlation
Psychiatric symptoms: anxiety (DASH‐II) NS Not reported Univariate, Spearman rank correlation
Psychiatric symptoms: PDD/autism(DASH‐II) NS Not reported Univariate, Spearman rank correlation
Psychiatric symptoms: schizophrenia (DASH‐II) NS Not reported Univariate, Spearman rank correlation
Psychiatric symptoms: stereotypies/tics (DASH‐II) NS Not reported Univariate, Spearman rank correlation
Psychiatric symptoms: organic syndromes (DASH‐II) NS Not reported Univariate, Spearman rank correlation
Psychiatric symptoms: elimination disorder (DASH‐II) NS Not reported Univariate, Spearman rank correlation
Psychiatric symptoms: eating disorder (DASH‐II) NS Not reported Univariate, Spearman rank correlation
Psychiatric symptoms: sleep disorder (DASH‐II) NS Not reported Univariate, Spearman rank correlation
Psychiatric symptoms: sexual disorder (DASH‐II) NS Not reported Univariate, Spearman rank correlation

Rojahn et al. (2010), USA

Low quality

n = 57 adults (38M, 19F) with mild, moderate, severe, or profound intellectual disability residing at a developmental centre (M age = 50.98, SD = 11.55, range 23–81) Informant reports by care staff Self‐injurious behaviour (BPI‐01) Psychiatric symptoms: ASD (ASD‐DA) + F(1, 55) = 6.32, η 2 = .10 Multivariate, ANOVA
Self‐injurious behaviour (ASD‐BPA) NS Not reported Multivariate, MANOVA
Aggressive behaviour in general (BPI‐01, ASD‐BPA) Psychiatric symptoms: ASD (ASD‐DA) NS F(1, 55) = 0.34, η 2 = .06 Multivariate, ANOVA

Ross and Oliver (2002), UK

Low quality

n = 24 adults (15M, 9F) with severe or profound intellectual disability (M age = 39.96, SD = 10.88) Informant reports by care staff Physically aggressive behaviour (CBI) Psychiatric symptoms: mood, interest, pleasure (MIPQ) NS Not reported Univariate, Fisher's Exact test
Verbally aggressive behaviour (CBI) Psychiatric symptoms: mood, interest, pleasure (MIPQ) NS Not reported Univariate, Fisher's Exact test
Destructive behaviour (CBI) Psychiatric symptoms: mood, interest, pleasure (MIPQ) NS Not reported Univariate, Fisher's Exact test
Self‐injurious behaviour (CBI) Psychiatric symptoms: mood, interest, pleasure (MIPQ) NS Not reported Univariate, χ 2‐test

Sappok et al. (2014), Germany

High quality

n = 203 adult patients of a psychiatric department (139M, 64F), with mild, moderate, or severe/profound intellectual disability (M age = 35.8, SD = 12.6) and living in different settings Retrospective chart review Physically aggressive behaviour (MOAS) Social skills: emotional development (SAED) NS Not reported Univariate, Pearson correlation
Psychiatric diagnosis: schizophrenia, mood disorders, neurotic disorders, personality disorders, ASD (ICD‐10 diagnosis as derived from case file) NS Not reported Univariate, Pearson correlation
Psychiatric diagnosis: dependency disorder (ICD‐10 diagnosis as derived from case file) NS r = .19 Univariate, Pearson correlation
Verbally aggressive behaviour (MOAS) Social skills: emotional development (SAED) + β = 0.26, CI [0.10; 0.43] Multivariate, regression analysis
Psychiatric diagnosis: schizophrenia (ICD‐10 diagnosis as derived from case file) NS r = −.19 Univariate, Pearson correlation
Psychiatric diagnosis: mood disorders (ICD‐10 diagnosis as derived from case file) NS r = .17 Univariate, Pearson correlation
Psychiatric diagnosis: neurotic disorders, ASD, dependency disorders (ICD‐10 diagnosis as derived from case file) NS Not reported Univariate, Pearson correlation
Psychiatric diagnosis: personality disorder (ICD‐10 diagnosis as derived from case file) + β = 1.05, CI [0.34; 1.76] Multivariate, regression analysis
Destructive behaviour (MOAS) Social skills: emotional development (SAED) NS Not reported Univariate, Pearson correlation
Psychiatric diagnosis: schizophrenia, mood disorders, neurotic disorders, personality disorders, ASD, dependency disorders (ICD‐10 diagnosis as derived from case file) NS Not reported Univariate, Pearson correlation
Self‐injurious behaviour (MOAS) Social skills: emotional development (SAED) β = −0.38, CI [−0.53; −0.23] Multivariate, regression analysis
Psychiatric diagnosis: schizophrenia, mood disorders, neurotic disorders, personality disorders (ICD‐10 diagnosis as derived from case file) NS Not reported Univariate, Pearson correlation
Psychiatric diagnosis: dependency disorders (ICD‐10 diagnosis as derived from case file) NS r = .15 Univariate, Pearson correlation
Psychiatric diagnosis: ASD (ICD‐10 diagnosis as derived from case file) + β = 0.49, CI [0.17; 0.80] Multivariate, regression analysis
Aggressive behaviour in general (MOAS) Social skills: emotional development (SAED) NS Not reported Univariate, Pearson correlation
Psychiatric diagnosis: schizophrenia, mood disorders, neurotic disorders, personality disorders, ASD, dependency disorders (ICD‐10 diagnosis as derived from case file) NS Not reported Univariate, Pearson correlation

Tenneij et al. (2009), the Netherlands

High quality

n = 108 adults (82M, 26F) with mild intellectual disability residing in inpatient treatment facilities for individuals with severe behavioural and emotional problems (M age = 26.4, SD = 7.5) Informant reports by care staff Aggressive behaviour in general (SOAS‐R) Aggressive behaviour: self‐injurious (SOAS‐R) + OR = 6.2, CI [1; 38.9] Multivariate, stepwise regression analysis
Self‐injurious behaviour (SOAS‐R) Aggressive behaviour: general (SOAS‐R) + OR = 6.2, CI [1; 38.9] Multivariate, stepwise regression analysis

Thorson et al. (2008), USA

Low quality

n = 58 adults (19M, 39F) older than 21 years, with mild, moderate, severe, or profound intellectual disability residing in developmental centres Informant reports by care staff Self‐injurious behaviour (BPI) Psychiatric diagnosis: any axis I disorder (DSM‐IV‐TR, DASH‐II) NS Not reported Multivariate, MANOVA post hoc pairwise comparisons
Psychiatric diagnosis: schizophrenia (DSM‐IV‐TR, DASH‐II) NS Not reported Multivariate, MANOVA post hoc pairwise comparisons
Aggressive behaviour in general (BPI) Psychiatric diagnosis: any axis I disorder (DSM‐IV‐TR, DASH‐II) NS Not reported Multivariate, MANOVA post hoc pairwise comparisons
Psychiatric diagnosis: schizophrenia (DSM‐IV‐TR, DASH‐II) NS Not reported Multivariate, MANOVA post hoc pairwise comparisons

Totsika et al. (2008), UK

Low quality

n = 58 adults (36M, 22F) with moderate or severe intellectual disability, living in a long‐term residential facility (M age = 45.26, SD = 12, range 23–83 years) Informant reports by care staff Physically aggressive behaviour (Individual Schedule) Psychiatric diagnosis: any (Individual Schedule) NS OR = 2.57, CI [0.57; 11.69] Univariate, odds ratio a
Self‐injurious behaviour (Individual Schedule) Psychiatric diagnosis: any (Individual Schedule) NS OR = 0.42, CI [0.12; 1.38] Univariate, odds ratio a

Tsiouris et al. (2011), USA

High quality

n = 4,069 adults (2,445M, 1,624F) with mild, moderate, severe, or profound intellectual disability living in the community and receiving services (M age = 49.6, SD = 14.0) Retrospective chart review + informant reports by care staff Physically aggressive behaviour (IBR‐MOAS) Psychiatric diagnosis: autism (DSM‐IV or DSM‐IV‐TR diagnosis derived from case file) + Incidence rate ratio = 1.285 Multivariate, incidence rate ratio a
Psychiatric diagnosis: anxiety (DSM‐IV or DSM‐IV‐TR diagnosis derived from case file) + Incidence rate ratio = 1.121 Multivariate, incidence rate ratio a
Psychiatric diagnosis: bipolar (DSM‐IV or DSM‐IV‐TR diagnosis derived from case file) + Incidence rate ratio = 1.560 Multivariate, incidence rate ratio a
Psychiatric diagnosis: psychosis (DSM‐IV or DSM‐IV‐TR diagnosis derived from case file) + Incidence rate ratio = 1.477 Multivariate, incidence rate ratio a
Psychiatric diagnosis: impulse control disorder (DSM‐IV or DSM‐IV‐TR diagnosis derived from case file) + Incidence rate ratio = 1.752 Multivariate, incidence rate ratio a
Psychiatric diagnosis: personality (DSM‐IV or DSM‐IV‐TR diagnosis derived from case file) + Incidence rate ratio = 1.271 Multivariate, incidence rate ratio a
Psychiatric diagnosis: OCD (DSM‐IV or DSM‐IV‐TR diagnosis derived from case file) NS Incidence rate ratio = 1.132 Multivariate, incidence rate ratio a
Psychiatric diagnosis: depression (DSM‐IV or DSM‐IV‐TR diagnosis derived from case file) NS Incidence rate ratio = 1.093 Multivariate, incidence rate ratio a
Verbally aggressive behaviour (against self and against others) (IBR‐MOAS) Psychiatric diagnosis: depression (DSM‐IV or DSM‐IV‐TR diagnosis derived from case file) +

Against self

Incidence rate ratio = 1.271

Against others

Incidence rate ratio = 1.154

Multivariate, incidence rate ratio a
Psychiatric diagnosis: bipolar (DSM‐IV or DSM‐IV‐TR diagnosis derived from case file) +

Against self

Incidence rate ratio = 1.292

Against others

Incidence rate ratio = 1.402

Multivariate, incidence rate ratio a
Psychiatric diagnosis: psychosis (DSM‐IV or DSM‐IV‐TR diagnosis derived from case file) +

Against self

Incidence rate ratio = 1.388

Against others

Incidence rate ratio = 1.322

Multivariate, incidence rate ratio a
Psychiatric diagnosis: impulse control disorder (DSM‐IV or DSM‐IV‐TR diagnosis derived from case file) +

Against self

Incidence rate ratio 1.401

Against others

Incidence rate ratio = 1.560

Multivariate, incidence rate ratio a
Psychiatric diagnosis: personality (DSM‐IV or DSM‐IV‐TR diagnosis derived from case file) +

Against self

Incidence rate ratio = 1.422

Against others

Incidence rate ratio = 1.257

Multivariate, incidence rate ratio a
Psychiatric diagnosis: anxiety (DSM‐IV or DSM‐IV‐TR diagnosis derived from case file) +

Against self

Incidence rate ratio = 1.208

Multivariate, incidence rate ratio a
NS

Against others

Incidence rate ratio = 1.083

Multivariate, incidence rate ratio a
Psychiatric diagnosis: autism (DSM‐IV or DSM‐IV‐TR diagnosis derived from case file) NS

Against self

Incidence rate ratio = 1.014

Against others

Incidence ratio = 0.925

Multivariate, incidence rate ratio a
Psychiatric diagnosis: OCD (DSM‐IV or DSM‐IV‐TR diagnosis derived from case file) NS

Against self

Incidence rate ratio = 1.099

Against others

Incidence rate ratio = 1.055

Multivariate, incidence rate ratio a
Destructive behaviour (IBR‐MOAS) Psychiatric diagnosis: autism (DSM‐IV or DSM‐IV‐TR diagnosis derived from case file) + Incidence rate ratio = 1.257 Multivariate, incidence rate ratio a
Psychiatric diagnosis: anxiety (DSM‐IV or DSM‐IV‐TR diagnosis derived from case file) + Incidence rate ratio = 1.200 Multivariate, incidence rate ratio a
Psychiatric diagnosis: OCD (DSM‐IV or DSM‐IV‐TR diagnosis derived from case file) + Incidence rate ratio = 1.232 Multivariate, incidence rate ratio a
Psychiatric diagnosis: bipolar (DSM‐IV or DSM‐IV‐TR diagnosis derived from case file) + Incidence rate ratio = 1.517 Multivariate, incidence rate ratio a
Psychiatric diagnosis: psychosis (DSM‐IV or DSM‐IV‐TR diagnosis derived from case file) + Incidence rate ratio = 1.294 Multivariate, incidence rate ratio a
Psychiatric diagnosis: impulse control disorder (DSM‐IV or DSM‐IV‐TR diagnosis derived from case file) + Incidence rate ratio = 1.839 Multivariate, incidence rate ratio a
Psychiatric diagnosis: personality (DSM‐IV or DSM‐IV‐TR diagnosis derived from case file) + Incidence rate ratio = 1.300 Multivariate, incidence rate ratio a
Psychiatric diagnosis: depression (DSM‐IV or DSM‐IV‐TR diagnosis derived from case file) NS Incidence rate ratio = 1.051 Multivariate, incidence rate ratio a
Self‐injurious behaviour (IBR‐MOAS) Psychiatric diagnosis: ASD (DSM‐IV or DSM‐IV‐TR diagnosis derived from case file) + Incidence rate ratio = 1.383 Multivariate, incidence rate ratio a
Psychiatric diagnosis: anxiety (DSM‐IV or DSM‐IV‐TR diagnosis derived from case file) + Incidence rate ratio = 1.343 Multivariate, incidence rate ratio a
Psychiatric diagnosis: bipolar (DSM‐IV or DSM‐IV‐TR diagnosis derived from case file) + Incidence rate ratio = 1.495 Multivariate, incidence rate ratio a
Psychiatric diagnosis: psychosis (DSM‐IV or DSM‐IV‐TR diagnosis derived from case file) + Incidence rate ratio = 1.176 Multivariate, incidence rate ratio a
Psychiatric diagnosis: impulse control disorder (DSM‐IV or DSM‐IV‐TR diagnosis derived from case file) + Incidence rate ratio = 1.664 Multivariate, incidence rate ratio a
Psychiatric diagnosis: personality (DSM‐IV or DSM‐IV‐TR diagnosis derived from case file) + Incidence rate ratio = 1.598 Multivariate, incidence rate ratio a
Psychiatric diagnosis: depression (DSM‐IV or DSM‐IV‐TR diagnosis derived from case file) NS Incidence rate ratio = 1.126 Multivariate, incidence rate ratio a
Psychiatric diagnosis: OCD (DSM‐IV or DSM‐IV‐TR diagnosis derived from case file) NS Incidence rate ratio = 1.190 Multivariate, incidence rate ratio a

Turygin et al. (2013), USA

Low quality

n = 332 adults (180M, 152F) with mild, moderate, severe, or profound intellectual disability residing in a developmental centre Informant reports by Self‐injurious behaviour (ASD‐BPA) Psychiatric symptoms: depression (DASH‐II depression subscale) +

r = .15, CI

[−0.01; 0.30]

Univariate, Pearson correlation
Aggressive behaviour in general (ASD‐BPA) Psychiatric symptoms: depression (DASH‐II depression subscale) + r = .40, CI [.26; 0.52] Univariate, Pearson correlation

Tyrer et al. (2006), UK

Low quality

n = 3,062 adults (1,745M, 1,317F) with mild, moderate, severe or profound intellectual disability living in Leicester (range 19–92 years) and living in different settings Retrospective case review Physically aggressive behaviour (case file: defined as physically aggressive behaviour towards others that occurred within the last 12 months and that was rated by a carer as either frequent or severe, or both frequent and severe) Living situation: residential home (compared to independent living) (case file) + OR = 2.79, CI [1.55; 5.02] Multivariate, logistic regression
Living situation: NHS accommodation (compared to independent living) (case file) + OR = 4.90, CI [2.52; 9.52] Multivariate, logistic regression
Living situation: living with relatives (compared to independent living) (case file) + OR = 1.11, CI [0.61; 2.01] Multivariate, logistic regression
Living situation: other (compared to independent living) (case file) + OR = 1.22, CI [0.24; 6.08] Multivariate, logistic regression
Psychiatric diagnosis: ASD (case file) NS OR = 1.32, CI [0.74; 2.35] Multivariate, logistic regression
Psychiatric symptoms: frustration (case file: carers were asked whether the symptom had been present recently) +

Minor

OR = 0.90–1.79

Major

OR = 2.15–4.44

Multivariate, logistic regression
Psychiatric symptoms: mood swings (case file: carers were asked whether the symptom had been present recently) +

Minor

OR = 1.34–2.73

Major

OR = 6.43–13.40

Multivariate, logistic regression
Psychiatric symptoms: unhappiness/upset/crying (case file: carers were asked whether the symptom had been present recently) NS

Minor

OR = 0.85–1.60

Major

OR = 0.94–2.19

Multivariate, logistic regression
Psychiatric symptoms: withdrawal (case file: carers were asked whether the symptom had been present recently) NS

Minor

OR = 0.82–1.54

Major

OR = 0.60–1.50

Multivariate, logistic regression
Psychiatric symptoms: anxiousness/phobias/irrational fears (case file: carers were asked whether the symptom had been present recently) NS

Minor

OR = 0.72–1.38

Major

OR = 0.85–1.72

Multivariate, logistic regression
Psychiatric symptoms: feeling things always set against them (case file: carers were asked whether the symptom had been present recently) NS

Minor

OR = 0.67–1.46

Major

OR = 0.56–1.46

Multivariate, logistic regression
Psychiatric symptoms: lethargy (case file: carers were asked whether the symptom had been present recently) NS

Minor

OR = 0.64–1.23

Major

OR = 0.63–1.48

Multivariate, logistic regression

Abbreviations: ABC, Aberrant Behaviour Checklist; ABCL, Adult Behaviour Checklist; AQC, Attachment Questionnaire for Children; ASD‐BPA, Autism Spectrum Disorder‐Behaviour Problems for Adults; ASD‐DA, Autism Spectrum Disorder‐Diagnosis for intellectually disabled adults; BPI, Behaviour Problems Inventory; BPI‐S, Behaviour Problems Inventory Short Form; CBI, Challenging Behaviour Interview; CCB, Checklist of Challenging Behaviour; DAS, Disability Assessment Schedule; DAS‐B, Disability Assessment Schedule for behaviour problems; DASH‐II, Diagnostic Assessment of the Severely Handicapped‐II; DBC‐A, Developmental Behaviour Checklist for Adults; DSM, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; EPQ‐R, Eysenck Personality Questionnaire‐Revised; IBR‐MOAS, Institute for Basic Research‐Modified Overt Aggression Scale; ICAP, Inventory for Client and Agency Planning; ICD, International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems; LEL, Life Events List; LES, Life Event Scale; MESSIER, Matson Evaluation of Social skills in Individuals with Severe Retardation; MIPQ, Mood, Interest and Pleasure Questionnaire; MIPQ‐S, Mood, Interest and Pleasure Questionnaire‐Short Form; MOAS(+), Modified Over Aggression Scale; NAS, Novaco Anger Scale; OAS, Observer Alexithymia Scale; PAS‐ADD, Psychiatric Assessment Schedule for Adults with Developmental Disabilities; PI, Provocation Inventory; PIMRA, Psychopathology Instrument for Mentally Retarded Adults; RSMB, Reiss Screen for Maladaptive Behaviour; SF‐36, Short Form Health Survey; SIB‐R, Scales of Independent Behaviour‐Revised; SOAS‐R, Staff Observation Aggression Scale‐Revised; STAXI, Spielberger State‐Trait Anger Expression Inventory; TESI, Traumatic Events Screening Inventory; WARS, Ward Anger Rating Scale.

a

Odds ratio or incidence rate ratio calculated based on information reported in the study.

b

For the purpose of correctly interpreting results, the direction of this association was changed.