Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 22;43(1):20–39. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13181

Table 1.

A proposed framework to assist operationalisation of salient concepts and theories of power as a means for identifying opportunities for action to address health inequalities

Sources of power Spaces of power Positions of power Form of power
Economic (income and wealth)
  • Markets and trade rules for goods and services (local, national and international)

  • Labour markets

  • Ownership of corporations, businesses, housing and land

  • Owners of capital (individuals, families, corporations and government)

  • High‐income individuals

  • Managers within the economic system (e.g. bankers, investors)

  • Regulators (e.g. government, auditors, planning officials)

  • Collective consumer decisions

  • Exploitation and domination of labour and the labour market

  • Rent and profit; housing options and choices

  • Debt and lending; household expenditure

  • Ability to ‘buy’ other sources of power

  • (Dis)investment

  • Ability to meet the costs of living

Knowledge Knowledge – generation
  • Academia

  • Research funders

  • Lobbyists, charities and campaign groups

  • Government and civil service

  • Academics

  • Research funders

  • Leaders within lobbying, charity and campaign groups

  • Officials

  • Knowledge and ignorance

  • (Lack of) influence

  • Hierarchies of knowledge

  • Access to policy processes

Knowledge – media
  • Print and broadcast media

  • Internet

  • Social media

  • Public space (e.g. advertising, entertainment)

  • Owners of media (print, broadcast, social) including government

  • Advertisers (i.e. corporations and government)

  • Journalists and editors

  • Regulators

  • (Lack of) control of the flow of information

  • Agenda setting

  • Representation and framing of public issues, social groups and policies

  • Capacity for mobilising publics and/or pressuring individuals and organisations

Knowledge – education
  • Nurseries

  • Schools

  • Colleges and universities

  • Workplaces

  • Internet

  • Families

  • Sports

  • Controllers of the curriculum (government, religious leaders)

  • Funders of education

  • Teachers, lecturers and professors

  • People with specialist knowledge (e.g. doctors, nuclear physicists, computer hackers) and credentials (e.g. degrees, training certificates)

  • People with pastoral or mentorship roles (e.g. family, sports)

  • Agenda setting

  • (Lack of) access to knowledge and skills

  • Access to services and decision‐making

  • Access to relatively privileged occupations

  • Framing of everyday values, choices and theories‐in‐use

Culture and belief
  • Organised religion

  • Cultural norms and values

  • Religious leaders

  • Elders

  • Well‐connected and influential individuals

  • Media owners, advertisers, regulators, celebrities, presenters and editors

  • Replication of rules and norms which are difficult to challenge

  • Access to networks of influence

  • Stigma, shame

  • Discrimination, exclusion

  • Framing of public values, choices and theories‐in‐use

Collective organisations Political institutions
  • Political parties

  • Parliaments

  • Privy Councils

  • Royal and Official Commissions

  • Elected representatives, leaders and party officials

  • Party funders

  • Party members

  • Support professionals (e.g. researchers, advisors, lawyers, PR)

  • Voters

  • Agenda setting

  • Public spending and legislative decisions

  • (Lack of) access to and control of state power

  • Representation and framing of public issues, social groups and policies

  • Elections (internal and public)

Other collectives
  • Workplaces and trade unions

  • Campaign groups

  • Democratic innovations

  • Charities and voluntary organisations

  • Clubs, societies and networks

  • Trade union officials

  • Activists, organisers and their funders

  • Funders

  • Active citizens

  • Spokespeople

  • Support professionals (e.g. researchers, advisors, lawyers, PR)

  • Gangs and criminal organisations

  • Militia

  • Collective labour action

  • Capacity for advocacy and campaigning

  • Collaborative or participatory decision‐making

  • Boycotts and spending decisions

  • Creation and dissemination of information

  • Agenda setting and influence

  • Use of force or intimidation

State Government
  • Civil service

  • Policing, legislation, treaties, regulations

  • Crown powers

  • Public services/social security system

  • Civil service hierarchy

  • Aristocracy, elites and the ‘establishment’

  • Ministers of state

  • Local government

  • Facilitation or blocking of decisions and implementation

  • Crown powers

  • Positional/hierarchical

  • Tax, (dis)investment and spending decision

Military, physical and legal force
  • International use of armed forces

  • Policing

  • Industrial disputes

  • Legal processes

  • Prison systems

  • Government

  • Armed forces chiefs and military leaders

  • Judiciary

  • Police

  • Use of force or intimidation

  • Interpretation and application of the law

  • Stigma, shame, coercion

  • Discrimination, exclusion

Positional Hierarchies and networks
  • Workplaces

  • Domestic relationships and gender

  • Schools

  • Cultural activities and sports

  • People in senior or management positions

  • Majority groups and historical ‘victors’

  • Men

  • Fee‐paying school alumni

  • Discrimination and stigma

  • Workplace hierarchies

  • Social networks

  • Influence