Table 6.
Area debarked (mm2) during 3 days of feeding | Area debarked (mm2) during 5 days of feeding | Area debarked (mm2) during 7 days of feeding | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Contrasts | df | t | P | df | t | P | df | t | P |
BC vs BH | 54 | 3.43 | 0.01 | 54 | 2.57 | 0.12 | 54 | 1.61 | 0.59 |
VC vs VH | 54 | 0.01 | 1.00 | 54 | −0.33 | 0.99 | 54 | 0.17 | 1.00 |
NC vs NH | 54 | −0.80 | 0.96 | 54 | −1.27 | 0.79 | 54 | −1.33 | 0.76 |
Total consumption (mean area debarked, mm2) during 3, 5 and 7 cumulative days of feeding were compared among control (water‐treated) and Bt‐treated Picea abies stem pieces (high concentration of the individual formulation). Treatments are abbreviated as follows: control and Bt galleriae treated food (BC, BH); control and Bt israelensis (VC, VH); control and Bt tenebrionis (NC, NH). Significant effects (P < 0.05) are shown in bold.