Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 19;16(2):e0247024. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247024

Table 4. Comparison of the genetic inheritance models for GSTP1 rs1695 polymorphism and allelic association in ALS patients.

Models Genotype Control (101) Case (101) OR (CI 95%) pa AIC BIC
Codominant A/A 42 (41.6%) 53 (52.5%) 1.00 0.170 282.4 292.4
A/G 47 (46.5%) 42 (41.6%) 0.71 (0.40–1.27)
G/G 12 (11.9%) 6 (5.9%) 0.40 (0.14–1.14)
Dominant A/A 42 (41.6%) 53 (52.5%) 1.00 0.120 281.6 288.2
A/G-G/G 59 (58.4%) 48 (47.5%) 0.64 (0.37–1.12)
Recessive A/A-A/G 89 (88.1%) 95 (94.1%) 1.00 0.140 281.8 288.4
G/G 12 (11.9%) 6 (5.9%) 0.47 (0.17–1.30)
Overdominant A/A-G/G 54 (53.5%) 59 (58.4%) 1.00 0.480 283.5 290.1
A/G 47 (46.5%) 42 (41.6%) 0.82 (0.47–1.43)
Logarithmic 0.66 (0.43–1.03) 0.062 280.6 287.2
Allele              
A 131 (65%) 148 (73%) 0.085
  G 71 (35%) 54 (27%)        

aThe comparison of the genetic inheritance models was obtained by logistic regression and the allelic association was evaluated by Fisher’s exact test. All study participants were matched by gender and age, and therefore this adjustment was not necessary for logistic regression. Abbreviations: OR = Odds Ratio; CI = Confidence Interval 95%; AIC = Akaike Information Criteria; BIC = Bayesian Information Criteria. Significance between groups: p<0.05.