Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 19;16(2):e0246237. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246237

Table 3. Predictors of antenatal care utilization among women of reproductive age group (n = 682) in Hawassa HDSS, South Ethiopia, in 2019.

Variables Category Antenatal utilization COR AOR
Yes No
Wealth index Poorest 84 59 Ref. Ref.
Poor 67 58 1.23 (0.75, 2.0) 0.94 (0.53, 1.64)
Middle 136 20 0.2 (0.12, 0.37)* 0.09 (0.04, 0.19)**
Richer 48 27 0.8 (0.45, 1.42) 0.47 (0.20, 1.08)
Richest 136 47 0.5(0.30, 0.78)* 0.17 (0.07, 0.42)**
Formal maternal education Yes 413 137 3.85 (2.59, 5.7)* 4.72 (2.82, 7.90)**
No 58 74 Ref. Ref.
Model household Training Yes 333 55 6.84(4.75, 9.86)* 8.52(5.52,13.15)**
No 138 156 Ref. Ref.
Road accessibility Yes 406 196 0.48(0.27, 0.86)* 0.57 (0.27, 1.22)
No 65 15 Ref. Ref.
Media access Yes 259 141 0.61(0.43, 0.85)* 0.69 (0.36, 1.34)
No 212 70 Ref. Ref.
Current pregnancy planned Yes 448 180 3.36 (1.90,5.91)* 3.65 (1.67, 8.01)**
No 23 31 Ref. Ref.
Information about antenatal care Yes 427 170 2.34(1.47, 3.71)* 1.43 (0.67, 3.05)
No 44 41 Ref. Ref.
Counseled about danger sign Yes 361 145 1.49(1.04, 2.14)* 1.56 (0.86, 2.85)
No 110 66 Ref. Ref.

Key: Ref: Reference categories

*: P-value < 0.05 in binary logistic regression analysis

**: P-value < 0.01 in multivariable logistic regression analysis.