Level | Description |
---|---|
Source:
http://www.sign.ac.uk/pdf/sign50.pdf
Source (contents, abbreviations, notes): http://www.cebm.net/?o=1025 | |
1++ | High-quality meta-analyses, systematic reviews of RCTs, or RCTs with a very low risk of bias |
1+ | Well-conducted meta-analyses, systematic reviews, or RCTs with a low risk of bias |
1− | Meta-analyses, systematic reviews, or RCTs with a high risk of bias |
2++ | High-quality systematic reviews of case-control or cohort studies, or high-quality case-control or cohort studies with a very low risk of confounding or bias and a high probability that the relationship is causal |
2+ | Well-conducted case-control studies or cohort studies with a low risk of confounding or bias and a moderate probability that the relationship is causal |
2− | Case-control studies or cohort studies with a high risk of confounding or bias and a significant risk that the relationship is not causal |
3 | Non-analytic studies, e.g. case reports, case series |
4 | Expert opinion |