Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 19;9(3):E472–E481. doi: 10.1055/a-1333-1776

Table 1a. Characteristics of included studies (N = 17).

Study Region State/city Study type Data collection Ethnicity Sample size Male proportion (%) Mean age/(age range)
Liang 2012 USA Cleveland 1 1996–2006 Caucasians 18,003 56.1 61.4
Kahi 2011 USA Indiana 1 2000–2009 Caucasians 6,681 49 58.9
Hetzel 2010 USA Boston 1 2006–2008 Caucasians 7,192 44 58
Abdeljaward 2015 USA Indiana 1 2005–2012 Caucasians 1,910 46.2 (≥ 50)
Sanaka 2014 USA Cleveland 1 2008–2009 Caucasians 2,167 52 (≥ 50)
Ross 2015 USA Texas 1 2010–2013 Mixture 2,833 35.4 (50–75)
Pyo 2017 South Korea Seoul 1 2002–2012 Asians 35,126 50.5 48.5
Min 2012 South Korea Seoul, Chungcheongnam-do 1 2007–2008 Asians 926 52.1 (> 45)
Kim 2014 South Korea Seoul 1 2005–2012 Asians 28544 60.8 (22–88)
Lee 2013 South Korea Seoul 1 2011–2012 Asians 1,375 52.4 (> 50)
Wijkerslooth 2013 Netherlands Amsterdam, Rotterdam 1 2009–2010 Caucasians 1,354 NA (50–75)
Hazewinkel 2014 Netherlands Amsterdam, Rotterdam 1 2009–2010 Caucasians 1426 51 (50–75)
Grobbee 2017 Netherlands Amsterdam, Rotterdam 1 2009–2010 Caucasians 1,256 51 (50–75)
Leung 2012 Hong Kong Hong Kong 1 2008–2011 Asians 1,282 48.4 49.1
Chang 2017 Taiwan Taipei 1 2010–2014 Asians 6,198 51.1 (≥ 50)
Buda 2012 Italy Feltre 1 2007–2008 Caucasians 985 38 (≥ 50)
Ijspeert 2016 Poland NA 1 2009–2012 Caucasians 12361 NA (50–65)

Notes: Study type: 1 = cross-sectional, 2 = cohort

NA, not available