Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 19;9(3):E472–E481. doi: 10.1055/a-1333-1776

Table 1b. Characteristics of included studies (N = 17).

Study Setting Detection method Smoker proportion Routine vs opportunistic Definition_SL Definition_location SL (%) HP (%) SSP (%) TSA (%)
Liang 2012 3 1 NA 1 WHO 20.6
Kahi 2011 2 1 NA 1 WHO a 13.0
Hetzel 2010 3 1 NA 1 a 11.7 0.6
Abdeljaward 2015 2 1 NA 1 WHO a 20.4 8.1 0.4
Sanaka 2014 3 1 NA 1 a 1.8
Ross 2015 2 1 NA 1 8.2
Pyo 2017 3 1 28.4 1 WHO b 0.5 0.6
Min 2012 2 1 NA 1 WHO a 11.9
Kim 2014 3 1 59.7 1 65.1 2 1 WHO a 15.1 14.7 0.5 0.1
Lee 2013 3 1 NA 1 WHO a 11.3
Wijkerslooth 2013 2 1 NA 1 WHO a 12.3
Hazewinkel 2014 2 1 NA 1 WHO a 27.2 23.8 4.8 0.1
Grobbee 2017 2 1 NA 1 12.7 3.0
Leung 2012 3 1 NA 1 WHO b 21.4
Chang 2017 3 1 20.1 1 WHO 1.9 1.4
Buda 2012 2 1 NA 1 WHO 4.6 2.3 0.5
Ijspeert 2016 2 1 NA 1 WHO a 26.6 2.2 0.8

Setting: 1 = national screening program, 2 = multiple centers, 3 = single

hospital/site; Detection method: 1 = colonoscopy, 2 = Sigmoidoscopy; Routine vs. opportunistic: 1 = rountine,

2 = opportunistic; Screening vs. surveillance: 1 = Screening, 2 = Screening and surveillance.

NA, not available

WHO: Serrated lesions (SLs) were classified according to WHO criteria as hyperplastic polyps (HP), sessile serrated polyp (SSP) without cytologic dysplasia, SSP with cytologic dysplasia (SSP-CD), traditional serrated adenoma (TSA) with and without conventional dysplasia, and serrated polyps unclassified; a: The proximal colon was defined as proximal to the splenic flexure; b: The proximal colon was defined as proximal to transverse colon.

1

Adenoma group

2

Serrated lesions group