Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 27;5(1):57–69. doi: 10.1007/s41669-020-00235-6

Table 1.

Number of dossiers used in the study stratified by Health Technology Assessment organization and disease

Organization Total Cancer Hepatitis C
AETSA 12 5 7a
AIFA 8 8 0
CADTH/pCODR 28 21 7
C2H 7 2 5
HAS 29 22 7
IQWiG 29 23 6
NICE 25 23 2
PBAC 51 43 8b
Total 189 147 42

aDaklinza, Exviera, Harvoni, Holkira Pak, Olysio, Sovaldi, Viekirax are evaluated in one dossier for AETSA

bDaklinza and Sunvepra are evaluated in one dossier for PBAC

AETSA Agencia de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias de Andalucía, AIFA Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco, C2H Center for Outcomes Research and Economic Evaluation for Health, CADTH Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health, HAS Haute Autorité de Santé, IQWiG Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Healthcare, NICE National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, PBAC Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee, pCODR pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review