Table 5.

Visual properties in IMD mice

Figure panel	Measure	V1	LM	PM	Statistic	By cell or by animal	V1 vs LM	V1 vs PM	LM vs PM
Figure 7D–F	Sample size: # neurons (# mice)	357 (4 mice)	370 (4 mice)	202 (4 mice)
Figure 7D, left	TF median (Hz)	1.67	1.88	2.21	KW test*, p = 0.0072, KW(s) = 9.8	By cell	NS, p = 0.12	p = 0.007	NS, p = 0.57
Figure 7D, right	TF mean (Hz)	1.88	2.08	2.25	Hierarchical bootstrap	By cell	NS, p = 0.098	NS, p = 0.072	NS, p = 0.26
Figure 7E, left	SF median (cycle/°)	0.091	0.078	0.11	KW test*, NS, p = 0.096	By cell	NS, p = 0.41	NS, p > 0.99	NS, p = 0.12
Figure 7E, right	SF mean (cycle/°)	0.094	0.086	0.1	Hierarchical bootstrap	By cell	NS, p = 0.24	NS, p = 0.32	NS, p = 0.19
Figure 7F, left	Speed median (°/s)	20.4	28.3	25.3	KW test*, p = 0.013, KW(s) = 8.7	By cell	p = 0.0095	NS, p = 0.47	NS, p = 0.85
Figure 7F, right	Speed mean (°/s)	20.1	24.4	22.3	Hierarchical bootstrap	By cell	NS, p = 0.093	NS, p = 0.22	NS, p = 0.27

KW, Kruskal–Wallis. TF, SF, and TF/SF preferences of cells that were visually responsive in ipsilateral eye-deprived mice.

*Statistics with a multiple-comparisons correction.