Table 6.

Interareal Mahalanobis distance analysis

Figure panel	Measure/statistic	Area	NoMD	CMD	IMD	By cell or by animal
Figure 7G	Sample size: # neurons (# mice)	V1	819 (8 mice)	726 (6 mice)	357 (4 mice)
		LM	645 (7 mice)	567 (4 mice)	370 (4 mice)
		PM	488 (8 mice)	216 (4 mice)	202 (4 mice)
Figure 7G	Mahalanobis distance, all cells	V1 vs LM	0.202	0.033	0.04	By cell
		V1 vs PM	0.033	0.093	0.076	By cell
		LM vs PM	0.167	0.036	0.043	By cell
Figure 7G	Wilk's λ test* on Mahalanobis distance	V1 vs LM	p < 0.0001	p = 0.0058	NS, p = 0.027	By cell
		V1 vs PM	p = 0.0064	p = 0.0004	p = 0.008	By cell
		LM vs PM	p < 0.0001	NS, p = 0.058	NS, p = 0.062	By cell
Figure 7I–J, top	Mean Mahalanobis distance, by animal	V1 vs LM	0.54	0.11	0.15	By animal#
		V1 vs PM	0.16	0.089	0.28	By animal#
		LM vs PM	0.23	0.043	0.2	By animal#
Figure 7I,J, bottom	Summed Mahalanobis distance	All pairwise	0.92	0.24	0.65	By animal#
Figure 7I, top	Two-way ANOVA on mean Mahalanobis distance	NoMD vs CMD: area p = 0.06; deprivation p = 0.022; area x deprivation p = 0.14
	Sidak's post hoc test	V1 vs LM (No MD vs CMD)	p = 0.0091
		V1 vs PM (No MD vs CMD)	NS, p = 0.91
		LM vs PM (No MD vs CMD)	NS, p = 0.37
Figure 7I, bottom	Welch's unpaired t test	No MD vs CMD	p = 0.039
Figure 7J, top	Two-way ANOVA on mean Mahalanobis distance	NoMD vs IMD: area p = 0.40; deprivation p = 0.28; area x deprivation p = 0.078
	Sidak's post hoc test	V1 vs LM (No MD vs IMD)	p = 0.042
		V1 vs PM (No MD vs IMD)	NS, p = 0.82
		LM vs PM (No MD vs IMD)	NS, p = 0.99
Figure 7I, bottom	Welch's unpaired t test	No MD vs IMD	p = 0.38

Mahalanobis distances based on preferred spatial and temporal frequency for each area in NoMD, CMD, and IMD mice.

*Statistics with a multiple-comparisons correction.

^#N = 4 for NoMD mice and N = 3 for CMD or IMD mice.