Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 5;44(3):795–803. doi: 10.2337/dc20-1879

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of adolescents without diabetes vs. those with T1D stratified by BMI classification vs. those with T2D

Control T1D T2D
Lean control Obese control Lean T1D (BMI <85th percentile) Overweight T1D (BMI 85– <95th percentile) Obese T1D (BMI ≥95th percentile)
Participants, n 43 47 82 28 25 59
Age (years) 15.0 ± 2.1 14.5 ± 2.0 15.7 ± 2.5 16.2 ± 2.3 15.6 ± 2.1c 15.4 ± 2.3
Female sex (%) 63 68 50 79e 32c,h 71
Race/ethnicity, n (% of total)
White 25 (58) 17 (36)a 71 (87)b 26 (93) 20 (80)d 11 (19)j
 Hispanic 8 (19) 20 (43)a 6 (7)a 0 (0) 3 (12)c 34 (57)j
 Other 10 (23) 10 (21) 5 (6)a 2 (7) 2 (8) 14 (24)
Tanner stage* 5 (4, 5) 5 (4, 5) 5 (4, 5) 5 (5, 5)e 5 (4, 5)g 5 (5, 5)
BMI (kg/m2) 20.9 ± 2.6 32.4 ± 5.9b 20.8 ± 2.2 26.3 ± 2.7f 31.1 ± 3.1fh 33.6 ± 5.9i
Diabetes duration (years) NA NA 7.2 ± 4.2 7.3 ± 4.0 5.5 ± 3.6 2.1 ± 1.9j
HbA1c (%) 5.2 ± 0.3 5.3 ± 0.3 8.5 ± 1.4b 8.6 ± 1.6 8.7 ± 1.5d 8.1 ± 2.4

Data are expressed as mean ± SD unless otherwise specified. NA, not applicable.

*

Median (interquartile range).

a

P < 0.05 vs. lean control group.

b

P < 0.001 vs. lean control group.

c

P < 0.05 vs. obese control group.

d

P < 0.001 vs. obese control group.

e

P < 0.05 vs. lean T1D.

f

P < 0.001 vs. lean T1D.

g

P < 0.05 vs. overweight T1D.

h

P < 0.001 vs. overweight T1D.

i

P < 0.05 vs. obese T1D.

j

P < 0.001 vs. obese T1D.