Table 2.
Publication(s) | Year of publication | Country | No of participant (male:female) | Setting | CCDT | Data collection | Methodology | Research question |
Green et al18 Hamilton et al19 |
2013 2015 |
UK | 23 (not reported) | 175 practices from seven cancer networks selected to include areas of affluence and poverty and practices with non-white population ranging from 2% to 50% UK |
Risk Assessment Tool | Telephone interviews Topic guide |
Framework | To explore GPs experiences of incorporating the Risk Assessment Tools (RAT) for lung and bowel cancer into their clinical practice and in so doing, identify constraints and facilitators to the wider dissemination of the tools in primary care. |
Dikomatis et al16 17 | 2012 2015 |
UK | 23 (13:10) | Diversity of practices located in deprived to affluent areas UK |
eRAT | Telephone interviews Topic guide |
Framework | Obtain views from general practitioners who piloted the electronic RATs (eRATs) for suspected lung or colorectal cancer. Whether GPs were able to integrate these tools into their everyday practice and identify facilitators and barriers to their more widespread use. |
Chiang et al8 | 2015 | Australia. | 15 (10:5) | Range of geographical location within Victoria Australia |
QCancer | Interview after simulated cases Semi-structured |
Framework | Explore the use of cancer risk tool (QCancer) in consultations and its potential impact on clinical decision making. |
Moffat and Green4 | 2014 | England, Scotland and Wales | 28 (19:9) | A mix of rural, suburban and urban areas and a range of affluent/eprived patient populations UK |
QCancer and Risk Assessment Tool | Telephone interviews semistructured |
Framework | Are clinical decision support tools acceptable to GPs and what are the barriers and facilitators to their integration into routine practice? |
Akanuwe15 | 2018 | England | 5 (not reported) | Lincolnshire (large rural county) England |
QCancer and Risk Assessment Tool | Focus group semistructured |
Framework | What do practitioners perceive as barriers and enablers (facilitators) to the implementation of cancer risk assessment tools? |
Pannebakker et al20 | 2019 | England | 14 (5:9) | Practices Central and Eastern Clinical Research Networks England |
7 Point Check List | Face to face interview semistructured |
Framework | To understand GP and patient perspectives on the implementation and usefulness of the eCDS. |
CCDT, Clinical Cancer Decision Tool; eCDS, Electronic clinical decision support; GPs, general practitioners.