Table 3.
Phase 1: Thematic coding |
Phase 2: Theoretical domains framework |
Normalisation process theory | ||
Inductive analysis | Themes: (1) The uncertain unskilled therapist Subtheme: The importance of getting it right (2) The patient’s understanding and priorities Subthemes: Needing to focus on patient goals Helping the patient to understand somatosensation (3) System pressures and resources Subthemes: Not having the right tools Sharing or deferring professional roles |
Deductive analysis | Key domains: Knowledge (Whether or not the therapist has knowledge of evidence-based sensory rehabilitation and how to do it) Skills (Whether or not the therapist has the ability and competence to provide evidence-based sensory rehabilitation) Environmental context and resources (Whether or not the therapist believes the environmental context – physical or cultural -supports delivery of sensory rehabilitation) Social professional role and identity (Whether identity as an occupational therapist or physiotherapist influences whether they provide evidence-based sensory rehabilitation) Social influences (Interpersonal processes causing therapists to change their thoughts, feelings or behaviours towards evidence-based sensory rehabilitation) |
Key categories and constructs: Individual specification (coherence) (Does the therapist acknowledge their personal role in, and responsibility to use evidence-based sensory rehabilitation?) Internalisation (coherence) (Does the therapist identify any benefit from adopting evidence-based sensory rehabilitation? Therapist coming to a conclusion about its worth) Legitimation (cognitive participation) (Does the therapist believe it is appropriate for them to deliver evidence-based sensory rehabilitation?) |