Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 19;11(2):e042879. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042879

Table 3.

Overview of themes and prominent codes

Phase 1:
Thematic coding
Phase 2:
Theoretical domains framework
Normalisation process theory
Inductive analysis  Themes:


 (1) The uncertain unskilled therapist


 Subtheme:
The importance of getting it right


 (2) The patient’s understanding and priorities


 Subthemes:
Needing to focus on patient goals
Helping the patient to understand somatosensation


 (3) System pressures and resources


 Subthemes:
Not having the right tools
Sharing or deferring professional roles
Deductive analysis  Key domains:


Knowledge
 (Whether or not the therapist has knowledge of evidence-based sensory rehabilitation and how to do it)


Skills
 (Whether or not the therapist has the ability and competence to provide evidence-based sensory rehabilitation)


Environmental context and resources
 (Whether or not the therapist believes the environmental context – physical or cultural -supports delivery of sensory rehabilitation)


Social professional role and identity
 (Whether identity as an occupational therapist or physiotherapist influences whether they provide evidence-based sensory rehabilitation)


Social influences
 (Interpersonal processes causing therapists to change their thoughts, feelings or behaviours towards evidence-based sensory rehabilitation)
 Key categories and constructs:


Individual specification (coherence)
 (Does the therapist acknowledge their personal role in, and responsibility to use evidence-based sensory rehabilitation?)


Internalisation (coherence)
 (Does the therapist identify any benefit from adopting evidence-based sensory rehabilitation? Therapist coming to a conclusion about its worth)


Legitimation (cognitive participation)
 (Does the therapist believe it is appropriate for them to deliver evidence-based sensory rehabilitation?)