Table 3.
Dose administered | Length of small intestine (cm) | Distance moved by the charcoal meal (cm) | Peristaltic index (%) | % inhibition |
---|---|---|---|---|
Control | 58.30 ± 1.02 | 46.50 ± 1.14 | 84.82 ± 1.47 | — |
CF 100 mg/kg | 58.16 ± 1.24 | 46.83 ± 1.44b∗∗∗ | 80.53 ± 1.67b∗∗∗ | 7.10 |
CF 200 mg/kg | 57.16 ± 1.93 | 40.83 ± 2.41b∗∗∗ | 71.43 ± 3.14a∗b∗∗∗ | 17.61 |
CF 400 mg/kg | 56.83 ± 0.94 | 33.83 ± 1.86a∗∗b∗∗∗ | 59.50 ± 3.92a∗b∗∗∗ | 31.70 |
EA 100 mg/kg | 55.33 ± 1.49 | 41.00 ± 3.04b∗∗∗ | 74.50 ± 4.72a∗b∗∗∗ | 14.00 |
EA 200 mg/kg | 55.83 ± 1.04 | 31 ± 2.61b∗∗∗ | 55.54 ± 4.24a∗b∗∗∗ | 35.90 |
EA 400 mg/kg | 56.38 ± 1.62 | 23.50 ± 1.47a∗∗∗b∗∗ | 41.68 ± 2.57a∗∗∗b∗∗ | 51.92 |
AF 100 mg/kg | 56.60 ± 1.23 | 34.16 ± 1.66b∗∗∗ | 60.35 ± 3.56b∗∗∗ | 30.41 |
AF 200 mg/kg | 56.16 ± 0.96 | 25.66 ± 2.57a∗∗∗b∗∗ | 45.69 ± 4.22a∗∗b∗∗ | 47.34 |
AF 400 mg/kg | 57.00 ± 1.45 | 20.33 ± 1.23a∗∗∗b∗ | 35.66 ± 3.37a∗∗∗b∗ | 58.83 |
Loperamide 3 mg/kg | 55.83 ± 0.87 | 18.66 ± 0.88a∗∗∗ | 33.00 ± 1.52a∗∗∗ | 59.80 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6); analysis was performed with One-Way ANOVA followed by Tukey test; acompared to negative control; bcompared to loperamide 3 mg/kg; ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, and ∗∗∗P < 0.001; CF: chloroform fraction; EAF: ethyl acetate fraction; AF: aqueous fraction; negative controls received 10 ml/kg distilled water.