Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Horm Behav. 2020 Nov 30;128:104890. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2020.104890

Table 1.

The top 25 miR and other small RNA expression differences in GEN females vs. CTL females.

Gene Symbol Fold Change GEN Females vs. CTL Females P value* Directionality in GEN Females vs. CTL females
miR1298 1.4034354 0.001781
Gm23751 1.47135797 0.00179
miR146 1.78836542 0.001875
miR421 1.36924469 0.002702
miR96 4.14480504 0.004023
miR182 4.0615682 0.004832
Snord88c 1.56719727 0.004985
Gm23287 4.09486096 0.005109
miR222 1.46465536 0.005765
miR298 1.38872638 0.005994
miR148a 1.59102935 0.007445
miR383 1.76688733 0.009317
miRlet7f-2 1.48499733 0.009686
miR183 3.40486272 0.009734
AC161763.1 1.3584389 0.012621
miRlet7a-2 1.39544508 0.017995
miR7j 1.36856277 0.019257
miR7-1 1.99505005 0.020599
miR335 1.38574501 0.020992
miR184 1.63480121 0.022064
miR7-2 1.99626025 0.022486
miR211 1.80300333 0.022902
Gm26016 0.32753953 0.027425
miR200b 3.89660695 0.029901
miR98 1.35469043 0.031589
*

For this comparison, no miRs or other small RNAs were different based on FDR, and thus, this table is based on p value.