Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 8;11:587561. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.587561

Table 3.

Stratified analysis of association between miRNA polymorphisms and type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Genotype Male Female ≥60 <60
OR(95%CI)a P value OR(95%CI)a P value OR(95%CI)b P value OR(95%CI)b P value
miR-133a-1 rs8089787
CT vs CC 0.76(0.45, 1.27) 0.289 1.05(0.65, 1.70) 0.850 1.31(0.70, 2.44) 0.402 0.74(0.48, 1.14) 0.165
TT vs CC 0.46(0.04, 5.07) 0.522 1.36(0.36, 5.19) 0.651 1.87(0.16, 21.35) 0.616 0.86(0.23, 3.26) 0.822
CT+TT vs CC 0.74(0.44, 1.23) 0.248 1.07(0.67, 1.71) 0.767 1.33(0.72, 2.45) 0.367 0.74(0.49, 1.13) 0.167
miR-133a-2 rs13040413
CT vs CC 1.29(0.82, 2.02) 0.274 1.21(0.76, 1.95) 0.424 1.26(0.79, 2.010) 0.336 1.20(0.76, 1.89) 0.436
TT vs CC 2.27(0.76, 6.76) 0.141 2.13(0.86, 5.27) 0.103 5.42(1.52, 19.30) 0.009 1.22(0.49, 3.05) 0.672
CT+TT vs CC 1.38(0.90, 2.13) 0.145 1.31(0.85, 2.04) 0.226 1.50(0.96, 2.33) 0.077 1.19(0.78, 1.83) 0.425
let-7a-1 rs13293512
TC vs TT 1.34(0.85, 2.11) 0.213 1.35(0.84, 2.17) 0.219 2.19(1.21, 3.97) 0.010 1.08(0.72, 1.60) 0.714
CC vs TT 1.87(1.03, 3.39) 0.040 1.38(0.76, 2.50) 0.287 2.40(1.37, 4.23) 0.005 1.25(0.76, 2.05) 0.375
TC+CC vs TT 1.47(0.95, 2.26) 0.084 1.36(0.87, 2.13) 0.179 3.20(1.42, 7.22) 0.002 1.12(0.77, 1.64) 0.545
let-7f rs10877887
TC vs TT 1.17(0.77, 1.80) 0.466 1.24(0.80, 1.93) 0.336 1.44(0.82, 2.51) 0.200 1.14(0.79, 1.65) 0.486
CC vs TT 0.70(0.36, 1.36) 0.290 1.01(0.52, 1.94) 0.988 0.99(0.40, 2.46) 0.986 0.82(0.48, 1.41) 0.472
TC+CC vs TT 1.05(0.70, 1.57) 0.808 1.18(0.78, 1.79) 0.429 1.34(0.79, 2.27) 0.282 1.05(0.75, 1.49) 0.764
miR-27a rs895819
AG vs AA 1.53(1.00, 2.34) 0.049 1.02(0.66, 1.58) 0.925 1.35(0.78, 2.34) 0.289 1.23(0.85, 1.77) 0.267
GG vs AA 1.50(0.69, 3.25) 0.308 1.01(0.44, 2.33) 0.977 4.92(1.01, 24.05) 0.049 0.95(0.50, 1.80) 0.874
AG+GG vs AA 1.59(1.07, 2.59) 0.039 1.02(0.67, 1.54) 0.942 1.53(0.90, 2.61) 0.119 1.17(0.83, 1.66) 0.366

aORs and 95%CI and corresponding P values were calculated by logistic regression analysis adjusted by age, smoking, drinking, hypertension, and dyslipidemia; bORs and 95%CI and corresponding P values were calculated by logistic regression analysis adjusted by sex, smoking, drinking, hypertension, and dyslipidemia; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.