Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 8;11:587561. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.587561

Table 4.

SNP-environmental factors interaction effects on type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Smoking (+) vs (-) Drinking (+) vs (-) Hypertension (+) vs (-) Dyslipidemia (+) vs (-)
OR(95%CI)a P value OR(95%CI)b P value OR(95%CI)c P value OR(95%CI)d P value
miR-133a-1 rs8089787
CT vs CC 1.26(0.63, 2.56) 0.514 0.78(0.36, 1.68) 0.524 1.08(0.47, 2.49) 0.857 0.73(0.26, 2.04) 0.550
TT vs CC 4.77(0.32, 70.74) 0.257 1.05(0.33, 3.30) 0.935 1.87(0.12, 29.59) 0.656 1.05(0.33, 3.30) 0.935
CT+TT vs CC 1.36(0.68, 2.69) 0.385 0.89(0.42, 1.89) 0.756 1.13(0.50, 2.53) 0.775 0.73(0.26, 2.01) 0.538
miR-133a-2 rs13040413
CT vs CC 1.02(0.54, 1.96) 0.946 1.42(0.70, 2.90) 0.333 1.82(0.86, 3.88) 0.120 0.87(0.38, 1.96) 0.730
TT vs CC 2.24(0.38, 13.14) 0.371 1.87(0.95, 3.67) 0.068 2.24(0.38, 13.14) 0.371 1.08(0.21, 5.46) 0.929
CT+TT vs CC 1.24(0.67, 2.29) 0.491 10.26(2.08, 50.56) 0.004 1.86(0.91, 3.82) 0.089 0.92(0.43, 1.97) 0.824
let-7a-1 rs13293512
TC vs TT 2.04(1.00, 4.17) 0.049 1.75(0.91, 3.39) 0.096 1.06(0.51, 2.20) 0.882 0.74(0.32, 1.75) 0.498
CC vs TT 2.58(1.00, 6.68) 0.051 1.93(1.03, 3.60) 0.040 0.67(0.27, 1.66) 0.382 1.00(0.33, 3.04) 0.997
TC+CC vs TT 2.15(1.09, 4.23) 0.027 2.56(1.09, 6.01) 0.030 0.93(0.47, 1.84) 0.828 0.80(0.35, 1.80) 0.583
let-7f rs10877887
TC vs TT 1.40(0.76, 2.58) 0.286 1.50(0.76, 2.97) 0.240 0.81(0.41, 1.61) 0.551 0.55(0.25, 1.21) 0.136
CC vs TT 1.74(0.69, 4.42) 0.241 2.33(0.81, 6.69) 0.116 1.11(0.38, 3.21) 0.850 1.46(0.46, 4.66) 0.520
TC+CC vs TT 1.46(0.82, 2.59) 0.202 1.64(0.86, 3.11) 0.134 0.88(0.46, 1.67) 0.689 0.69(0.33, 1.43) 0.318
miR-27a rs895819
AG vs AA 1.11(0.61, 2.05) 0.730 0.97(0.49, 1.91) 0.926 1.18(0.59, 2.34) 0.640 1.30(0.59, 2.84) 0.518
GG vs AA 2.38(0.74, 7.67) 0.147 0.77(0.21, 2.81) 0.695 2.86(0.79, 10.43) 0.111 0.79(0.20, 3.12) 0.738
AG+GG vs AA 1.26(0.70, 2.24) 0.442 0.93(0.49, 1.78) 0.833 1.37(0.72, 2.63) 0.340 1.18(0.57, 2.48) 0.656

aORs and 95%CI and corresponding P values were calculated by logistic regression analysis adjusted by age, sex, drinking, hypertension, and dyslipidemia; b, ORs and 95%CI and corresponding P values were calculated by logistic regression analysis adjusted by age, sex, smoking, hypertension, and dyslipidemia; cORs and 95%CI and corresponding P values were calculated by logistic regression analysis adjusted by age, sex, smoking, drinking, and dyslipidemia; d ORs and 95%CI and corresponding P values were calculated by logistic regression analysis adjusted by age, sex, smoking, drinking, and hypertension; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.