Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 14;6(1):100559. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2020.08.016

Table 4.

Summary of single institution retrospective series evaluating SBRT as a bridge to transplant for HCC

Study No. patients, No. lesions RT dose Median tumor size pCR rate cCR rate Dropout rate Toxicity
Facciuto et al8 17, 22 24-36 Gy in 2-4 fx 2.01 cm 14% 30% NR 2 patients with post-SBRT nausea, 1 patient with acute liver decompensation
O’Connor et al9 10, 11 33-54 Gy in 3 fx 3.4 cm 27% NR 0% 40% with acute grade 1-2 toxicity, no ≥grade 3 toxicity
Gresswell et al10 12, 17 30-50 Gy in 4-6 fx 2.3 cm 46% 80% 8% No ≥grade 3 acute toxicity
Moore et al11 23, NR 30-54 Gx in 3-5 fx 2.5 cm 27.3 % NR 30% 1 patient (CP B8) developed RILD
Uemura et al12 22, 25 40-50 Gy in 4-6 fx 3.2 cm 28% NR 9% No ≥grade 3 toxicity
Jacob et al13 12, 18 27-45 Gy in 2-6 fx 4.2 cm 100% NR 42% No ≥grade 3 toxicity
Garg et al (current study) 20, 26 30-63 Gy in 3-6 fx 3.05 cm 62% 76% 22% No ≥grade 3 toxicity

Abbreviations: cCR = clinical complete response; CP = Child-Pugh; HCC = hepatocellular carcinoma; NR = not reported; pCR = pathologic complete response; RILD = radiation-induced liver disease; RT = radiation therapy; SBRT = stereotactic body radiation therapy.