Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 16;13:147–160. doi: 10.2147/JEP.S270038

Table 4.

The Effect of Crude Urtica simensis and Solvent Fractions on Heart Weight to Body Weight Ratio

Heart Weight to Body Weight Ratio
Experimental Groups Heart Wt. Body Wt. Heart Wt./Body Wt. (×10−4)
Normal control (2% tween 80%) 1.18±0.02 385.67±7.47 30.70±0.60
Negative control CP(200mg/kg i.p) 1.49±0.04 363.33±4.68 41.00±0.80a***
Positive control (EN 10mg/kg/Po) 1.08±0.04 343.67±7.37 31.30±0.90b***
CE(100mg/kg)+CP(200mg/kg) 1.16±0.02 358.17±9.38 32.70±1.10b***
CE(200mg/kg)+CP(200mg/kg) 1.09±0.03 341.33±7.64 31.80±0.50b***
CE(400mg/kg)+CP(200mg/kg) 1.12±0.02 355.83±6.24 31.50±0.40b***
AF(200mg/kg)+ CP(200mg/kg) 1.14±0.02 346.00±8.02 32.80±0.30b***
AF(400mg/kg)+ CP(200mg/kg) 1.14±0.07 351.00±8.58 32.30±1.80b***
HF(200mg/kg)+ CP(200mg/kg) 1.18±0.04 357.00±7.14 32.80±0.90b***
HF(400mg/kg)+ CP(200mg/kg) 1.21±0.05 370.00±5.11 32.50±1.20b***

Notes: Mean ±SEM (n= 6); analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post hoc test; aCompared with normal control; bCompared with negative control (CP); ***p<0.001.

Abbreviations: AF, aqueous fraction; CE, crude extract; CP, cyclophosphamide; EN, enalapril; HF, hexane fraction; Wt., weight.