Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 15;379(2194):20200246. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2020.0246

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Both plots are averages over 100 trials. (a) Lorenz 96 performance across varying algorithms. The direct polynomial regression outperforms both types of ESNs. The horizontal line at 0.3 is used as a standard measure of error for L96 to determine when a surrogate fails. (b) Modified Chua Task Performance across varying algorithms. The HSR ESN fails across most training trials due to the model being in a different part of state-space than it was trained on. LSR ESN and D2R2 both do better, with D2R2 being best overall. (Online version in colour.)