Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 15;379(2194):20200246. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2020.0246

Table 1.

Performance metrics for the three algorithms (L96). There was one large training set Dtr, and then 100 smaller training sets Dte for each algorithm. For L96 tasks, the prediction is considered diverged when normalized testing error (SF) exceeds 0.3. Time until divergence is measured in model time units (MTU, 1MTU = 200Δt), a standardized timescale for L96. The HSR-ESN only worked on a subset of testing cases that were temporally distant from generated training data, while others instantly failed. For this and future tables, results are given as mean ± s.d. over 100 trials.

training error TF error SF error divergence time
LSR-ESN 1.80 × 10−4 4.33×102±1.75×103 1.16 ± 1.06 × 10−1 1.25 ± 4.85 × 10−1
HSR-ESN 7.10 × 10−5 4.08 × 10−1 ± 3.37 × 10−1 1.09 × 101 ± 8.62 4.53 × 10−1 ± 5.93 × 10−1
D2R2 2.24 × 10−4 2.28 × 10−4 ± 2.11 × 10−5 1.13 ± 1.06 × 10−1 1.60 ± 5.31 × 10−1