Abstract
Background
Multimerin 1 (human: MMRN1, mouse: Mmrn1) is a homopolymeric, adhesive, platelet and endothelial protein that binds to von Willebrand factor and enhances platelet adhesion to fibrillar collagen ex vivo.
Objectives
To examine the impact of Mmrn1 deficiency on platelet adhesive function, and the molecular motifs in fibrillar collagen that bind MMRN1 to enhance platelet adhesion.
Methods
Mmrn1‐deficient mice were generated and assessed for altered platelet adhesive function. Collagen Toolkit peptides, and other triple‐helical collagen peptides, were used to identify multimerin 1 binding motifs and their contribution to platelet adhesion.
Results
MMRN1 bound to conserved GPAGPOGPX sequences in collagens I, II, and III (including GPAGPOGPI, GPAGPOGPV, and GPAGPOGPQ) that enhanced activated human platelet adhesion to collagen synergistically with other triple‐helical collagen peptides (P < .05). Mmrn1−/− and Mmrn1+/− mice were viable and fertile, with complete and partial platelet Mmrn1 deficiency, respectively. Relative to wild‐type mice, Mmrn1−/− and Mmrn1+/− mice did not have overt bleeding, increased median bleeding times, or increased wound blood loss (P ≥ .07); however, they both showed significantly impaired platelet adhesion and thrombus formation in the ferric chloride injury model (P ≤ .0003). Mmrn1−/− platelets had impaired adhesion to GPAGPOGPX peptides and fibrillar collagen (P ≤ .03) and formed smaller aggregates than wild‐type platelets when captured onto collagen, triple‐helical collagen mimetic peptides, von Willebrand factor, or fibrinogen (P ≤ .008), despite preserved, low shear, and high shear aggregation responses.
Conclusions
Multimerin 1 supports platelet adhesion and thrombus formation and binds to highly conserved, GPAGPOGPX motifs in fibrillar collagens that synergistically enhance platelet adhesion.
Keywords: blood platelets, fibrillar collagens, multimerin, platelet adhesiveness, von Willebrand factor
Essentials.
Multimerin 1 (Mmrn1) is a homopolymeric protein that supports platelet adhesion in vitro.
Mmrn1‐deficient mice and collagen peptides were used to assess Mmrn1 contributions to platelet function.
Mmrn1 loss impaired platelet adhesion in vivo and to GPAGPOGPX motifs in collagens in vitro.
Mmrn1 contributes to platelet function and binds to adhesive GPAGPOGPX motifs in collagen.
1. INTRODUCTION
Platelet adhesion is a critical step in hemostasis and thrombosis that allows platelets to localize and accumulate at sites of vessel injury or thrombus formation. Multimerin 1 (human: MMRN1, mouse: Mmrn1) is a large, soluble, homopolymeric adhesive glycoprotein that is synthesized and stored by megakaryocytes/platelets and endothelial cells for regulated release, but is undetectable in normal plasma. 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 When released, MMRN1 supports platelet adhesion through shear‐dependent mechanisms involving activated αIIbβ3 and αVβ3 under static conditions and low shear flow conditions (≤150 s−1), and involving von Willebrand factor (human: VWF; mouse: Vwf) and GPIbα, but not β3 integrins, under high shear flow (1500 s−1). 5 , 6 MMRN1 binds to VWF with high affinity through a two‐site, two‐step interaction with the VWF A1 and A3 domains that enhances platelet adhesion to immobilized VWF at high shear flow. 7 MMRN1 also enhances platelet adhesion to vascular fibrillar collagens I and III and Horm collagen (equine collagen I, ~95%, and III, ~5%) under high shear flow through mechanisms requiring VWF and GPIbα 6 and uncharacterized motifs in collagen that support MMRN1 binding. The impact of Mmrn1 deficiency on platelet function has not been fully characterized.
Similar to MMRN1, the adhesive proteins VWF, fibronectin (FN), vitronectin (VN), and fibrin self‐associate to form large homopolymers, 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 and bind to αIIbβ3 on platelets 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 to mediate aggregate formation. Additionally, thrombospondin‐1 (TSP‐1) helps to crosslink platelets by self‐associating and binding αIIbβ3‐bound fibrinogen (FG). 21 These interactions create large macromolecular complexes that increase the likelihood of platelet–platelet collisions and the avidity of platelet–matrix or platelet–platelet interactions. 22 We postulated that the large MMRN1 homopolymers released by platelets and endothelial cells might similarly enhance platelet–matrix or platelet–platelet interactions, as Mmrn1−/−Snca−/− mice (evaluated by the ferric chloride [FeCl3] mesenteric vessel injury model) have impaired platelet adhesion and thrombus formation in vivo, and impaired platelet adhesion to collagen in vitro, that are corrected by exogenous MMRN1. 23
We generated Mmrn1‐deficient (Mmrn1−/−) mice to: (a) determine the impact of selective Mmrn1 loss on platelet adhesion and thrombus formation in vivo; (b) identify additional adhesive ligands for MMRN1/Mmrn1, and the impact of Mmrn1 deficiency on platelet adhesion and aggregation; and (c) investigate the motifs in collagen that support binding to MMRN1. We demonstrate that Mmrn1 contributes to platelet adhesion and thrombus formation in vivo and update the current model of platelet adhesion to collagen to include GPAGPOGPX, a conserved MMRN1/Mmrn1 binding motif that synergistically enhances platelet adhesion.
2. METHODS
The study was conducted in accordance with the recently revised Declaration of Helsinki with approval of the Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board, McMaster University Animal Research Ethics Board, and St. Michael's Animal Care Committee.
Mmrn1‐deficient mice were generated as outlined in Appendix S1 in supporting information. Experiments were done with wild‐type, Mmrn1−/−, and Mmrn1+/− mice obtained from crosses of Mmrn1+/− mice that were regenerated every three to five generations by additional crosses, as outlined in Appendix S1.
2.1. Evaluation of mouse bleeding after tail transection
Bleeding times (BT) and blood loss following tail transection 1.5 mm from the distal tip were evaluated as described. 24 BT were recorded as 900 seconds if bleeding had not stopped by then.
2.2. Blood collection
Murine blood was obtained by terminal exsanguination of anesthetized mice after carotid artery cannulation. 25 Human blood was collected from general population controls with written informed consent.
2.3. Mouse blood counts and glycoprotein analysis
Complete blood counts were determined using a Hemavet 950 instrument (Drew Scientific Inc). Platelet Mmrn1 content was evaluated by western blot analysis of platelet lysate after reduced sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS‐PAGE) using polyclonal rabbit antibodies (SC‐367225, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc). 26 Plasma and platelet Vwf were quantified by enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using polyclonal rabbit anti‐human VWF (A0082 and P0226, DAKO Canada Inc) and pooled normal mouse plasma (NMP) as the standard (results reported as % NMP) as described. 27 , 28 Flow cytometry was performed as described, 25 using: fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)‐labeled rat anti‐mouse GpIbα (CD42b; clone Xia.G5), anti‐mouse/rat P‐selectin (CD62P; Emfret Analytics; clone Wug.E9) and rat anti‐mouse β1 (CD29; BD Biosciences; clone Ha2/5), and phycoerythrin (PE)‐labeled hamster anti‐mouse β3 (CD61, BD Biosciences; clone 2C9.G2) and rat anti‐mouse activated αIIbβ3 (CD41/CD61, Emfret Analytics; clone JON/A).
2.4. Intravital microscopy
Platelet adhesion and thrombus formation in mesenteric arterioles treated with 250 mmol/L FeCl3 were evaluated as described, 23 to assess: (a) fluorescent platelet deposition on the vessel wall per minute, between 3 and 5 minutes following injury, (b) time to form the first 20 µm diameter thrombus, and (c) vessel occlusion time.
2.5. Preparation of recombinant human multimerin 1
Recombinant (r) human MMRN1 was affinity purified from media of stably transfected human embryonic kidney (HEK)‐293 cells and assessed for concentration and purity by ELISA, western blotting, and silver staining as described. 4 , 5
2.6. Protein binding assays
rMMRN1 binding to immobilized human FG (±pre‐treatment with 0.2 U/mL thrombin to induce fibrin formation), FN, or triple‐helical collagen peptides was evaluated based on methods described, 6 using Immulon 2 HB flat‐bottom plates (Thermo Fisher Scientific) coated (overnight, 4°C) with 1 µg/well protein or peptide.
2.7. Assays of platelet adhesion under shear
Endpoint and real‐time analyses of mouse platelet adhesion were evaluated as described, 7 except Vena8Fluoro+ (Cellix Ltd) biochips were coated (overnight, 4°C) with: 100 µg/mL Horm collagen (Nycomed Austria GmbH), 10 U/mL recombinant (r)Vwf, 100 µg/mL murine fibrinogen (Fg; ±15 minutes pre‐treatment with 0.2 U/mL thrombin after immobilization to convert to fibrin, as described) 5 (Molecular Innovations), 100 µg/mL murine fibronectin (Fn; Molecular Innovations), or combinations of triple‐helical collagen peptides (50 µg/mL of each, or 100 µg/mL GPP). For testing adhesion of Mmrn1−/− and wild‐type platelets in whole blood to Fg, fibrin, Fn, and rVwf, blood was collected into 93 µmol/L (50 µg/mL) PPACK, or into 93 µmol/L PPACK with 2 U/mL heparin for experiments with Horm collagen, 6 , 23 before labeling platelets with 4 µmol/L DiOC6(3) (Enzo Life Sciences; 10 minutes, 37°C, ≥5 × 108 platelets/mL). Mmrn1−/− and wild‐type whole blood for real‐time perfusion assays was collected into 10 U/mL heparin. 23 For assays with washed mouse platelets, samples were prepared and labeled with 4 µmol/L DiOC6(3) as described 7 and incubated with 10 µg/mL crosslinked collagen‐related peptide (CRP‐XL; sequence: GCO[GPO10]GCOG, hereafter referred to as CRP) to induce Mmrn1 release before testing.
2.8. Mouse platelet aggregation
Light transmission aggregometry (LTA) and whole blood aggregometry (WBA) were performed using: Mmrn1−/− and wild‐type mouse samples; a Chrono‐Log aggregometer (Havertown, PA; settings as recommended by the manufacturer) 23 ; mouse whole blood, platelet‐rich plasma (PRP), and gel‐filtered platelets (GFP, thrombin‐induced aggregation only), with PRP and GFP adjustment to 2.5 × 108 platelets/mL; and the agonists 5 µg/mL Horm collagen (Helena Laboratories), 10‐‐20 µmol/L adenosine diphosphate (ADP; Sigma Aldrich Canada), 500 µmol/L murine thrombin receptor‐activating peptide (TRAP; AYPGKF‐NH2), and 0.5‐‐1.0 U/mL human thrombin (GFP only).
Shear‐induced platelet aggregation (SIPA) was evaluated using a HAAKE Mars rheometer (Thermo Electron Corporation) fitted with a C35/0.5° Ti (35 mm diameter) cone. Shear stress τ and shear rate γ were calculated automatically by HAAKE RheoWin 3 software. Whole blood from Mmrn1−/− and wild‐type mice was collected in 1:10 (v/v) 3.2% sodium citrate, and supplemented with 5 mmol/L CaCl2 and 93 µmol/L PPACK (to promote aggregation and prevent clotting, respectively) immediately before loading samples. Blood was sheared by the rotating cone in a 0.3 mm gap for 1 minute at room temperature before fixation with 1:4 (v/v) 0.625% paraformaldehyde (0.5% final). Fixed platelets were labelled in the dark using 1:8.3 (v/v) of anti‐mouse GpIbα (CD42b, Emfret Analytics) for 15 minutes before diluting samples 1:200 (v/v) in phosphate buffered saline and adding BD™ Liquid Counting Beads (165 beads/mL, Becton, Dickinson and Company, BD Biosciences). After mixing by gentle pipetting, 50 000 events were collected with a Beckman Coulter® Epics® XL‐MCL™ flow cytometer and Expo32™ software (Beckman Coulter). Events were gated for single platelets (defined by forward and side scatter characteristics) using FlowJo™ 10 (Becton, Dickinson and Company). Platelet concentration was estimated by comparing platelet and counting bead events to determine the % reduction in platelet concentration for sheared relative to unsheared samples.
2.9. Peptide synthesis
Triple‐helical Collagen Toolkit II and III peptides (full sequences reported elsewhere) and derivatives (sequences in Table S1 in supporting information) were generated as described, 29 along with: CRP (GPVI ligand to activate platelets), 30 , 31 GFOGER (high‐affinity ligand for platelet integrin α2β1), 32 Toolkit peptide III‐23 (containing the VWF ligand GPRGQOGVMGFO), 33 and GPP (negative control).
2.10. Static platelet adhesion assays
Static platelet adhesion was evaluated largely as described, 34 using Mmrn1−/− and wild‐type samples and wells pre‐coated with: 1 µg/well rMMRN1, murine Fg (±pre‐treatment with 0.2 U/mL thrombin), murine Fn, Horm collagen or collagen peptides (0.5 µg/well of each of two peptides or 0.33 µg/well of each of three peptides), or a range of peptide concentrations for titrations, before blocking and adding washed platelets (prepared as described, 34 final: human: 1.6 × 108 platelets/mL, 8 × 106 platelets/well; mouse: 1.8 × 108 platelets/mL, 9 × 106 platelets/well). Unless otherwise specified, platelets were pre‐treated (without stirring) with 10 µg/mL of CRP (5 minutes, 37°C) immediately before testing.
2.11. Quantification of platelet adhesion and sizes of adherent platelet aggregates
Percent surface area covered by platelets was estimated using ImageJ (National Institutes of Health), and sizes of captured platelet aggregates on surfaces were estimated using representative regions (in‐focus) at the center of microcapillary channels, using the following objectives and areas: Horm collagen: 40× objective, ~60 mm2 square, 1020 × 1020 pixels; rVwf, fibrin(ogen), fibronectin, and collagen peptides: 20× objective, ~20 mm2 squares, 515 × 515 pixels. Grayscale images were converted to binary using the Threshold tool before separating features using the Watershed tool and counting using the Analyze Particles tool. As platelet aggregate sizes on Horm collagen varied greatly (~1‐‐40 000 µm2), data were binned and evaluated by frequency plots. Platelet aggregates captured onto rVwf, fibrin(ogen), fibronectin, and collagen peptides (sizes: ~1‐‐5000 µm2) were evaluated using mean feature sizes/image.
2.12. Statistical analyses
Two‐tailed independent or paired Student's t‐tests were used to evaluate data with normal distributions. Mann‐Whitney U‐tests were used to evaluate data with non‐normal distributions. One‐way or repeated measures analysis of variance were used to evaluate data with more than two groups (α < 0.05 considered significant). Bonferroni correction was used for post hoc multiple comparisons where k ≤ 6 or the Holm‐Sidak method where k > 6, with α < 0.05 considered significant for each family of comparisons. One‐tailed z test of population proportions was used to evaluate proportional data. Unless stated otherwise, data are reported as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM).
3. RESULTS
3.1. Mice homozygous for Mmrn1 E3 deletion are viable and fertile, with normal platelet aggregation responses and a minor prolongation of bleeding time
Mice homozygous for the E3‐deleted Mmrn1 allele (Mmrn1−/−; Figure 1A) were viable and fertile, and lacked detectable platelet Mmrn1 (Figure 1B), whereas Mmrn1+/− mice had reduced platelet Mmrn1 relative to wild‐type mice (Figure 1B). Mmrn1−/− and Mmrn1+/− mice had normal blood counts and Vwf levels (Table S2 in supporting information) and no overt bleeding or other phenotypic abnormalities. Additionally, compared to wild‐type platelets, Mmrn1−/− and Mmrn1+/− platelets showed comparable resting surface expression of glycoprotein (Gp)Ibα (CD42b) and β1 (CD29) and β3 integrins (CD61; Figure 1C), comparable thrombin‐induced platelet P‐selectin expression (CD62P; Figure S1A in supporting information) and only minor differences in activated αIIbβ3 expression (P < .01; Figure S1B). BT (Figure 1D), the proportion of mice that did not stop bleeding by 900 seconds (6/22 versus 6/22 versus 1/22; P ≥ .09) and BT wound blood loss (Figure 1E) were not significantly different for wild‐type, Mmrn1+/−, and Mmrn1−/− mice even when the comparisons were extended to 22 mice per group (P ≥ .07).
Platelets from Mmrn1−/− mice showed: normal low shear LTA responses to 0.5‐‐1.0 U/mL thrombin (P ≥ .37; Figure S2A,B in supporting information), TRAP, collagen, and 10‐20 µmol/L ADP (P ≥ .13; Figure S2C‐F); normal WBA responses to collagen (P ≥ .49, Figure S3); and normal SIPA over a range of shear rates (5000‐15 000 s−1; P ≥ .49, Figure S4).
3.2. Mmrn1 loss impairs platelet adhesion, thrombus formation, and vessel occlusion in vivo
In the FeCl3‐induced mesenteric vessel injury model, both Mmrn1−/− and Mmrn1+/− mice showed impaired platelet localization between 3 and 5 minutes following injury (P < .001; Figure 2A,B), and delayed appearance of the first large thrombus (≥20 µm; P < .001; Figure 2C), compared to wild‐type mice, with 2/9 Mmrn1−/−, 3/7 Mmrn1+/− versus 0/9 Mmrn1+/+ mice failing to form a thrombus ≥ 20 µm (P ≥ .067; Videos [Link], [Link], [Link] [in supporting information], respectively, show representative data for these mice). When large thrombi formed in arterioles of Mmrn1−/− or Mmrn1+/− mice, small platelet aggregates readily dissociated without re‐associating downstream. Although 11/11 Mmrn1+/+ mice formed an occlusive thrombus by 10 to 35 minutes after FeCl3‐induced injury, 3/8 Mmrn1−/− mice and 7/7 Mmrn1+/− mice failed to form an occlusive thrombus by 40 minutes (P ≤ .014 for comparisons with Mmrn1+/+ mice; P ≥ .29 for Mmrn1−/− to Mmrn1+/− mice comparisons; Figure 2D).
3.3. Mmrn1 loss selectively impairs platelet adhesion
In high shear flow experiments (1500 s−1), with whole blood, both Mmrn1−/− and Mmrn1+/− platelets showed reduced adhesion to Horm collagen and failed to form the large adherent aggregates seen with wild‐type platelets (P ≤ .008, Figure 3A). Real‐time analyses of the findings for Mmrn1−/− and Mmrn1+/+ samples (Videos S4 and S5 in supporting information, respectively), indicated that Mmrn1 deficiency was associated with less initial adhesion to collagen, and slower growth of platelet aggregates on collagen. Static platelet adhesion experiments verified that Mmrn1 deficiency impaired platelet adhesion to Horm collagen (P = .03; Figure 3B), without altering platelet adhesion to the triple‐helical collagen peptide GFOGER that functions as a high‐affinity α2β1 ligand (P = .49; Figure 3C). Mmrn1 deficiency also impaired platelet adhesion to Horm collagen in low shear flow (300 s−1) conditions (Figure S5 in supporting information).
In high shear flow adhesion experiments (1500 s−1), Mmrn1−/− and Mmrn1+/+ platelets showed similar adhesion to rVwf using whole blood (P = .13; Figure 4A) and washed platelets (P = .7; Figure S6 in supporting information), although Mmrn1−/− platelets were captured into smaller aggregates under these conditions (P < .0001).
Although rMMRN1 showed binding to human FG, fibrin, and FN (Figure S7A in supporting inforrmation; capitalized abbreviations indicate human proteins and mixed‐case abbreviations indicate mouse proteins), activated Mmrn1−/− and Mmrn1+/+ platelets showed comparable static adhesion to these proteins (P ≥ .14, Figure S7B). The αIIbβ3 blocking antibody 9D2 similarly reduced the adhesion of activated Mmrn1−/− and Mmrn1+/+ platelets to rMMRN1 and other αIIbβ3 ligands (Figure S7C). In low shear flow (300 s−1) adhesion assays with whole blood, activated Mmrn1−/− platelets showed a minor reduction in adhesion to Fg (P = .03), accompanied by a reduction in size of captured platelet aggregates (P = .007; Figure 4B), but normal adhesion to fibrin and Fn (Figure S8A‐D in supporting information).
3.4. MMRN1 binds to GPAGPOGPX motifs in fibrillar collagens, which enhance platelet adhesion and show high specificity for Mmrn1
Collagen Peptide Toolkits were used to determine the locations and sequences in fibrillar vessel wall collagens that bind MMRN1. rMMRN1 bound two Collagen Toolkit peptides, II‐9 and III‐38, that share a GPAGPOGPX sequence where X is valine (II‐9) or glutamine (III‐38; Figure 5A,B). Tests with truncated derivatives indicated that MMRN1 bound to GPAGPOGPX but not to other regions of III‐38 (Figure 5C). In silico searches indicated that the GPAGPOGPX motif is unique to fibrillar collagens, and that the GPAGPOGPV locus (helix residues: 151‐‐159) of peptide II‐9 is poorly conserved in collagens I and III. Searches for motifs conserved with the MMRN1‐binding sequence in peptide III‐38 (GPAGPOGPQ, helix residues: 682‐‐690), and searches for variants of GPAGPOGPX elsewhere in collagen I (which consists of one α2 and two α1 chains) identified GPAGPOGPI at helix residues 667 to 675 in D‐period 3 of the α1(I) triple helix, and GPAGSOGFQ in D‐period 2 at residues 457 to 465 that aligns with a conserved GPAGPOGFQ sequence in α2(I). GPAGPOGPI in collagen I overlaps in sequence alignments with GPAGPOGPQ in collagen III, which has a 9‐residue extension at its N‐terminus, offsetting helix numbering. Testing of these collagen I sequences as homotrimeric triple‐helical peptides, in parallel with GPP (negative control) indicated that GPAGPOGPI (P = .0002), but not the variants GPAGPOGFQ (P = .12) or GPAGSOGFQ (P = .52), supported MMRN1 binding (Figure 5D).
As the GPAGPOGPX motifs that bind MMRN1 in human collagens I, II, and III are fully conserved in murine collagens, these motifs were further tested using peptide‐coated wells and mouse platelets. In contrast to CRP‐activated Mmrn1−/− platelets (which showed minimal adhesion), CRP‐activated Mmrn1+/+ platelets showed dose‐dependent adhesion to GPAGPOGPQ and GPAGPOGPI (Figure 5E,F), indicating that GPAGPOGPX supports platelet adhesion by a Mmrn1‐dependent mechanism.
Although CRP‐activated human platelets did not significantly adhere to GPAGPOGPX peptides alone (Figure 6A), co‐presentation of GFOGER with GPAGPOGPX peptides, or with the VWF‐binding peptide III‐23, enhanced platelet adhesion (P ≤ .006; Figure 6B). When GFOGER was present, GPAGPOGPX peptides in combination with III‐23 further enhanced platelet adhesion (Figure 6B,C). The enhancing effect of GPAGPOGPX on platelet adhesion to GFOGER was increased by CRP activation to induce MMRN1 release (P ≤ .007, Figure 6D), either by adding CRP to the sample or to coating peptides (P > .24, Figure S9 in supporting information).
High shear flow experiments (1500 s−1) with CRP‐activated mouse platelets provided further evidence that GPAGPOGPX is highly specific for Mmrn1 as co‐presentation of GFOGER with GPAGPOGPQ increased the size of captured aggregates formed by wild‐type (P < .0001) but not Mmrn1−/− (P = .07) platelets (Figure 7A,B). Mmrn1−/− platelets were also noted to form smaller aggregates than wild‐type platelets on surfaces coated with GFOGER and GPP only (P < .001, Figure 7A,B), suggesting that Mmrn1 stabilizes platelet–platelet interactions through additional mechanisms.
4. DISCUSSION
Our goal was to evaluate platelet function in Mmrn1‐deficient mice and to identify motifs in collagen that support platelet adhesion by binding to MMRN1. Our main findings were: (a) partial and complete Mmrn1 loss impairs platelet adhesion and thrombus formation in vivo without causing a severe bleeding phenotype; (b) MMRN1 binds to FG, fibrin, and FN, but is not essential for platelet adhesion to these proteins, or to rVwf; (c) Mmrn1 loss preserves low shear and high shear platelet aggregation responses although it reduces platelet adhesion to fibrillar collagen and Fg, and the size of platelet aggregates captured onto these proteins; (d) partial and complete Mmrn1 impairs static, low shear, and high shear platelet adhesion to collagen; (e) Mmrn1 is not essential for platelet adhesion to rVwf or GFOGER but its loss reduces the size of platelet aggregates captured onto rVwf and GFOGER; and (f) fibrillar collagens that support platelet adhesion contain GPAGPOGPX motifs that are highly specific for Mmrn1 and work synergistically with other motifs to promote platelet adhesion.
Many studies of knockout mice have used the FeCl3‐induced mesenteric vessel injury model to assess platelet adhesion and thrombus formation. α2−/−, 35 FcRγ−/− (which do not express GPVI), 36 Tsp1−/−, 37 pFn−/−, 38 , 39 Fg−/−, 40 and Vn−/− mice 41 show impairments in one or two parameters of platelet adhesion and thrombus formation evaluated by this model. With Mmrn1−/− and Mmrn1+/− mice, platelet adhesion and thrombus formation were similarly impaired from start to finish in FeCl3‐injured vessels, reflected by reduced initial and final platelet adhesion and some mice failing to form any substantial thrombus. Mmrn1−/− and Mmrn1+/− mice did not exhibit spontaneous or fatal bleeding or significant alterations in BT. These data indicate that partial and complete Mmrn1 loss impairs platelet‐rich thrombus formation without incurring major impairments to hemostasis. This contrasts with the severely prolonged BT, reduced survival, or spontaneous bleeding reported for Vwf−/−, 42 Fg−/−, 43 β3−/−, 44 and GpIbα−/− mice 45 —which also have impaired FeCl3‐induced thrombus formation. It is interesting that Mmrn1+/− mice, which had a milder platelet Mmrn1 deficiency than Mmrn1−/− mice, had impaired high shear collagen adhesion, and impairments in platelet adhesion and thrombus formation in the FeCl3 vessel injury model that were similar to, and not significantly different from, the impairments observed with Mmrn1−/− mice. These observations suggest that Mmrn1 haploinsufficiency reduces Mmrn1 levels below what is needed to support Mmrn1‐dependent aspects of platelet function.
While we found that Mmrn1 is not required for platelet adhesion to Fg, fibrin, or Fn, its absence did reduce platelet adhesion, and the size of platelet aggregates captured onto Fg‐ but not fibrin‐coated surfaces under low shear flow. The latter discrepancies could reflect differences in the ultrastructure of surface‐adsorbed Fg versus fibrin, and/or differences in Fg‐ and fibrin‐αIIbβ3 binding interactions. 46 , 47 It is also possible that the high‐affinity conformation of αIIbβ3 or activation‐induced receptor clustering is required for platelets to bind Mmrn1, as activation enhances human platelet adhesion to MMRN1. 5 , 6 We suggest that Mmrn1 works synergistically with other proteins, including Fg and Vwf, to enhance platelet adhesion onto a growing platelet aggregate. The binding site(s) for MMRN1 on FG are unknown, but Mmrn1 does not appear to inhibit the ability of platelets to adhere to immobilized Fg, which occurs predominantly via the Fg γ‐chain binding to αIIbβ3. 48 Further, we did not detect an influence of Mmrn1 on platelet adhesion to immobilized Fn. Blockade of αIIbβ3 partially inhibited static adhesion of Mmrn1−/− and wild‐type platelets to rMMRN1, similar to what we observed with human platelets, 5 implicating the involvement of αIIbβ3 and other, yet‐to‐be‐identified receptors in Mmrn1 binding. 5
As platelets require activation for Mmrn1‐mediated adhesion, we suggest that Mmrn1 promotes adhesion after release from activated platelets and/or endothelial cells. The ligation of VWF to GPIbα induces activation of αIIbβ3 and Ca2+ mobilization in platelets, but it is insufficient for α‐granule release, 49 which could explain why we saw similar adhesion of Mmrn1−/− and Mmrn1+/+ platelets to rVwf. There was likely some non‐intentional platelet activation in the experiments measuring platelet adhesion to rVwf at high shear given that Mmrn1−/− platelets were captured into smaller aggregates. Nonetheless, our findings suggest that MMRN1 participates in platelet adhesion only after platelets are tethered and have secreted granule contents. As platelets adherent to collagen are activated, with granule content secretion, Mmrn1 could be more important for platelet adhesion to collagen than to Vwf, as our data suggest. Larger MMRN1 multimers preferentially stay bound to platelets, 4 which might enhance the avidity of Mmrn1 interactions with collagen fibers and Vwf multimers. As both Mmrn1−/− and Mmrn1+/− platelets showed impaired platelet adhesion to collagen in high shear flow, mild quantitative (eg, 50%) reductions in Mmrn1 appear to be sufficient to impair platelet–collagen interactions, which could have clinical implications. Additionally, Mmrn1 could bridge αIIbβ3‐bound Fg on activated platelets to collagen, to further stabilize platelet adhesion. The idea that adhesive proteins bind one another to form large, macromolecular complexes has been proposed as a possible explanation for the supportive role of multimeric platelet VN, 41 TSP‐1, 21 and insoluble (crosslinked) plasma FN in platelet aggregate formation, 50 and in platelet adhesion to collagen. 51
Our observations that complete and partial Mmrn1 loss impairs initial platelet adhesion and thrombus formation in the FeCl3 vessel injury model suggests Mmrn1 modifies macromolecular adhesive interactions in vivo. Potentially, Mmrn1 might bind to shear‐stretched Vwf multimers to form larger, heteropolymers that enhance platelet tethering and adhesion. As Mmrn1 loss reduced the size of platelet aggregates that adhered to collagen, rVwf, Fg, and GFOGER peptides, we suggest that Mmrn1 also functions to stabilize platelet–platelet interactions in wounds and injured vessels. Figure 8A summarizes the proposed role of Mmrn1 in platelet adhesion.
The GPAGPOGPX motif that binds MMRN1 is unique to collagens and distinct from other motifs identified with Collagen Toolkits (Figure 8B), 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 including those that bind VWF, 33 α2β1, 29 and GPVI. 61 While leukocyte‐associated Ig‐like receptor‐1 (LAIR‐1) binds to Collagen Toolkit peptide III‐38, LAIR‐1 binds to the repeated GPO motifs in peptide III‐38, not to the GPAGPOGPX sequence. 55 The conserved MMRN1‐binding motif GPAGPOGPI lies at the same locus in the collagen α1(I) chain. The defective adhesion of Mmrn1‐deficient platelets to GPAGPOGPX motifs that were evident in static, low shear, and high shear flow conditions suggests that Mmrn1 supports platelet adhesion in wounds that expose blood to fibrillar collagen. Additionally, Mmrn1‐GPAGPOGPX binding could be one of the VWF‐independent mechanisms that mediates platelet adhesion and aggregate formation on collagen under low shear flow conditions. 62
The in vivo defects in platelet adhesion and platelet‐rich thrombus formation of Mmrn1−/− and Mmrn1+/− mice may reflect other defects as collagen exposure in FeCl3 injured vessels appears minimal, 40 , 63 and the precise mechanisms that this model tests remain unclear. 64 , 65 While α2β1 and GpVI interact with fibrillar collagens to support platelet adhesion in vitro, 32 , 61 , 66 impaired signalling, rather than impaired collagen interactions, is thought to underlie the impaired thrombus formation of α2−/− and FcRγ−/− (GpVI‐deficient) mice in FeCl3 injured vessels. 35 , 36 Mmrn1 loss could have other effects, given that MMRN1 binds factor V and can affect thrombin generation. 67 In our study, we assessed the consequences of complete and partial Mmrn1 loss and in future studies, it would be interesting to test the contributions of platelet versus endothelial Mmrn1 in adhesion and thrombus formation in vivo, as both cells store Mmrn1 for activation‐induced secretion, and studies of other adhesive proteins stored in these cells (eg, von Willebrand factor, fibronectin) have provided insights on the relative contributions of the platelet versus endothelial stores.
Collagens are ubiquitous proteins that represent ~30% of total protein mass in mammals, 68 with about 90% of collagens estimated to be type I fibrillar collagen. 69 Injuries that sever or rupture a vessel would expose blood to the collagen‐rich outer layers of the vessel wall and extravascular connective tissues where Mmrn1 binding to GPAGPOGPX motifs may be very relevant to platelet adhesion. Disease‐causing mutations that impair MMRN1–collagen binding might affect platelet adhesion. While no pathogenic MMRN1 mutations are reported, G845R and G848R mutations in the GPAGPOGPI motif are associated with type II (perinatal lethal) osteogenesis imperfecta and a G852C mutation in GPAGPOGPQ is associated with type IV (vascular type) Ehlers‐Danlos syndrome, which causes hematomas, hemothorax, and vessel rupture. 70 , 71 Many mucocutaneous bleeding disorders remain uncharacterized and MMRN1 defects might go undetected by current bleeding disorder investigations. An assessment of platelet adhesion to collagen, and to combinations of CRP, GPAGPOGPX, and GFOGER peptides, could help identify cases of MMRN1 deficiency, but this would be a time‐ and resource‐intensive undertaking. Nonetheless, platelet MMRN1 deficiency might account for some platelet function abnormalities noted in gray platelet syndrome, Quebec platelet disorder, and αδ‐storage pool deficiency.
In summary, our study provides direct evidence that Mmrn1 contributes to platelet adhesion and thrombus formation in vivo, supports platelet adhesion and aggregate formation onto a variety of protein surfaces, and contributes to platelet adhesion to collagen through its interactions with Mmrn1‐specific GPAGPOGPX motifs in vessel wall fibrillar collagens.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
RWF is Scientific Advisor and AB is the Lead Peptide Scientist at CambCol Laboratories Ltd. The other authors declare that they have no real or perceived conflicts of interest to disclose.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
A. Leatherdale and D. Parker designed and conducted experiments, analyzed and interpreted the findings, and led the manuscript writing, in collaboration with C. P. M. Hayward, who supervised the study. S. Tasneem designed and performed experiments with S. W. Hamaia and analyzed data. Y. Wang performed and analyzed the FeCl3 vessel injury experiments. D. Bihan and A. Bonna designed and synthesized collagen mimetic peptides. D. Lillicrap provided recombinant mouse Vwf, contributed to experimental design and interpretation, and edited the manuscript. P. L. Gross provided essential tools, guidance on microscopy and experimental design, and edited the manuscript. H. Ni provided essential tools and led the experimental design and supervision of the FeCl3 vessel injury experiments. B. W. Doble developed the strategy for generating Mmrn1‐deficient mice, which was carried out by S. Tasneem. R. W. Farndale guided the studies using Collagen Toolkit peptides to map MMRN1 binding motifs, supervised collagen peptide synthesis, and interpretation of peptide binding data, and edited the manuscript.
Supporting information
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) grant MOP 133474 (CPMH), Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario operating grants T6586 and NA 7214 (CPMH), CIHR grant MOP 119540 and CIHR Foundation Grant 389035 (HN), CIHR Foundation Grant FDN‐154285 (DL), Wellcome Trust 094470/Z/10/Z (RWF), and the British Heart Foundation grant RG/15/4/31268 (RWF).
Leatherdale A, Parker D, Tasneem S, et al. Multimerin 1 supports platelet function in vivo and binds to specific GPAGPOGPX motifs in fibrillar collagens that enhance platelet adhesion. J Thromb Haemost. 2021;19:547–561. 10.1111/jth.15171
Manuscript handled by: X. Long Zheng
Final decision: X. Long Zheng, 06 November 2020
Alexander Leatherdale, D’Andra Parker, and Subia Tasneem contributed equally to this study, which was presented in abstract form at the 59th annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology, Atlanta, GA, 11 December 2017.
REFERENCES
- 1. Hayward CPM, Bainton DF, Smith JW, et al. Multimerin is found in the α‐granules of resting platelets and is synthesized by a megakaryocytic cell line. J Clin Invest. 1993;91:2630‐2639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Hayward CPM, Hassell JA, Denomme GA, Rachubinski RA, Brown C, Kelton JG. The cDNA sequence of human endothelial cell multimerin. J Biol Chem. 1995;270(31):18246‐18251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Kika Veljkovic D, Cramer EM, Fichelson S, Massé J‐M, Hayward CPM. Studies of α‐granule proteins in cultured human megakaryocytes. Thromb Haemost. 2003;90:844‐852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Hayward CPM, Smith JW, Horsewood P, Warkentin TE, Kelton JG. P‐155, a multimeric platelet protein that is expressed on activated platelets. J Biol Chem. 1991;266:7114‐7120. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Adam F, Zheng S, Joshi N, et al. Analyses of cellular multimerin 1 receptors: in vitro evidence of binding mediated by alphaIIbbeta3 and alphaVbeta3. Thromb Haemost. 2005;94:1004‐1011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Tasneem S, Adam F, Minullina I, et al. Platelet adhesion to multimerin 1 in vitro: influences of platelet membrane receptors, von Willebrand factor and shear. J Thromb Haemost. 2009;7:685‐692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Parker DN, Tasneem S, Farndale RW, et al. The functions of the A1A2A3 domains in von Willebrand factor include multimerin 1 binding Cellular Haemostasis and Platelets. Thromb Haemost. 2016;116:87‐95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Counts RB, Paskell SL, Elgee SK. Disulfide bonds and the quaternary structure of factor VIII/von Willebrand factor. J Clin Invest. 1978;62:702‐709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Mosher DF. Organization of the provisional fibronectin matrix: control by products of blood coagulation. Thromb Haemost. 1995;74:529‐533. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Bae E, Sakai T, Mosher DF. Assembly of exogenous fibronectin by fibronectin‐null cells is dependent on the adhesive substrate. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(34):35749‐35759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Pickering JG, Chow LH, Li S, et al. alpha5beta1 integrin expression and luminal edge fibronectin matrix assembly by smooth muscle cells after arterial injury. Am J Pathol American Society for Investigative Pathology. 2000;156:453‐465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Seiffert D, Schleef RR. Two functionally distinct pools of vitronectin (VN) in the blood circulation: Identification of a heparin‐binding competent population of VN within platelet a‐granules. Blood. 1996;88:552‐560. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Stockman A, Hess S, Declerck P, Timpl R, Preissner KT. Multimeric vitronectin. Identification and characterization of conformation‐dependent self‐association of the adhesive protein. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:22874‐22882. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Greenberg CS, Miraglia CC, Rickles FR, Shuman MA. Cleavage of blood coagulation factor XIII and fibrinogen by thrombin during in vitro clotting. J Clin Invest. 1985;75:1463‐1470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Parise LV, Philips DR. Fibronectin‐binding properties of the purified platelet glycoprotein IIb‐IIIa complex. J Biol Chem. 1986;261:14011‐14017. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Gardner JM, Hynes RO. Interaction of fibronectin with its receptor on platelets. Cell. 1985;42:439‐448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Seiffert D, Smith JW. The cell adhesion domain in plasma vitronectin is cryptic. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:13705‐13710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Weisel JW, Nagaswami C, Vilaire G, Bennett JS. Examination of the platelet membrane glycoprotein IIb‐IIIa complex and its interaction with fibrinogen and other ligands by electron microscopy. J Biol Chem. 1992;267:16637‐16643. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Kloczewiak M, Timmons S, Lukas TJ, Hawiger J. Platelet receptor recognition site on human fibrinogen. Synthesis and structure‐function relationship of peptides corresponding to the carboxy‐terminal segment of the gamma chain. Biochemistry. 1984;23:1767‐1774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Wang Y, Gallant RC, Ni H. Extracellular matrix proteins in the regulation of thrombus formation. Curr Opin Hematol. 2016;23:280‐287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Bonnefoy A, Hantgan R, Legrand C, Frojmovic MM. A model of platelet aggregation involving multiple interactions of thrombospondin‐1, fibrinogen, and GPIIbIIIa receptor. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:5605‐5612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Wang Y, Carrim N, Ni H. Fibronectin orchestrates thrombosis and hemostasis. Oncotarget. 2015;6:6‐7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Reheman A, Tasneem S, Ni H, Hayward CPM. Mice with deleted multimerin 1 and α‐synuclein genes have impaired platelet adhesion and impaired thrombus formation that is corrected by multimerin 1. Thromb Res Elsevier B.V.. 2010;125:e177‐e183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Vaezzadeh N, Ni R, Kim PY, Weitz JI, Gross PL. Comparison of the effect of coagulation and platelet function impairments on various mouse bleeding models. Thromb Haemost. 2014;112:412‐418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Kahr WHA, Lo RW, Li L, et al. Abnormal megakaryocyte development and platelet function in Nbeal2‐/‐mice. Blood. 2013;122:3349‐3358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Hayward CPM, Rivard GE, Kane WH, et al. An autosomal dominant, qualitative platelet disorder associated with multimerin deficiency, abnormalities in platelet factor V, thrombospondin, von Willebrand factor, and fibrinogen and an epinephrine aggregation defect. Blood. 1996;87:4967‐4978. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Pruss CM, Golder M, Bryant A, et al. Pathologic mechanisms of type 1VWD mutations R1205H and Y1584C through in vitro and in vivo mouse models. Blood. 2011;117:4358‐4366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Pruss CM, Golder M, Bryant A, Hegadorn C, Haberichter S, Lillicrap D. Use of a mouse model to elucidate the phenotypic effects of the von Willebrand factor cleavage mutants, Y1605A/M1606A and R1597W. J Thromb Haemost. 2012;10:940‐950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Raynal N, Hamaia SW, Siljander PRM, et al. Use of synthetic peptides to locate novel integrin α2β1‐binding motifs in human collagen III. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:3821‐3831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Morton LF, Hargreaves PG, Farndale RW, Young RD, Barnes MJ. Integrin alpha2beta1‐independent activation of platelets by simple collagen‐like peptides: collagen tertiary (triple‐helical) and quaternary (polymeric) structures are sufficient alone for alpha2beta1‐independent platelet reactivity. Biochem J. 1995;306:337‐344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Asselin J, Knight CG, Farndale RW, Barnes MJ, Watson SP. Monomeric (glycine‐proline‐hydroxyproline)10 repeat sequence is a partial agonist of the platelet collagen receptor glycoprotein VI. Biochem J. 1999;339:413‐418. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Knight CG, Morton LF, Peachey AR, Tuckwell DS, Farndale RW, Barnes MJ. The collagen‐binding a‐domains of integrins α1/β1 and α2/β1 recognize the same specific amino acid sequence, GFOGER, in native (triple‐ helical) collagens. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:35‐40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Lisman T, Raynal N, Groeneveld D, et al. A single high‐affinity binding site for von Willebrand factor in collagen III, identified using synthetic triple‐helical peptides. Blood. 2006;108:3753‐3756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Onley DJ, Knight CG, Tuckwell DS, Barnes MJ, Farndale RW. Micromolar Ca2+ concentrations are essential for Mg2+‐dependent binding of collagen by the integrin α2β1 in human platelets. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:24560‐24564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Kuijpers MJE, Pozgajova M, Cosemans JMEM, et al. Role of murine integrin alpha2beta1 in thrombus stabilization and embolization: contribution of thromboxane A2. Thromb Haemost. 2007;98:1072‐1080. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Dubois C, Panicot‐Dubois L, Merrill‐Skoloff G, Furie B, Furie BC. Glycoprotein VI‐dependent and ‐independent pathways of thrombus formation in vivo. Blood. 2006;107:3902‐3906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Prakash P, Kulkarni PP, Chauhan AK. Thrombospondin 1 requires von Willebrand factor to modulate arterial thrombosis in mice. Blood. 2015;125:399‐406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Ni H, Yuen PST, Papalia JM, et al. Plasma fibronectin promotes thrombus growth and stability in injured arterioles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:2415‐2419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Wang Y, Reheman A, Spring CM, et al. Plasma fibronectin supports hemostasis and regulates thrombosis. J Clin Invest. 2014;124:4281‐4293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Ni H, Denis CV, Subbarao S, et al. Persistence of platelet thrombus formation in arterioles of mice lacking both von Willebrand factor and fibrinogen. J Clin Invest. 2000;106:385‐392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Reheman A, Gross PL, Yang H, et al. Vitronectin stabilizes thrombi and vessel occlusion but plays a dual role in platelet aggregation. J Thromb Haemost. 2005;3:875‐883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Denis C, Methia N, Frenette PS, et al. A mouse model of severe von Willebrand disease: defects in hemostasis and thrombosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:9524‐9529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Suh TT, Holmback K, Jensen NJ, et al. Resolution of spontaneous bleeding events but failure of pregnancy in fibrinogen‐deficient mice. Genes Dev. 1995;9(16):2020‐2033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Hodivala‐Dilke KM, McHugh KP, Tsakiris DA, et al. β3‐integrin‐deficient mice are a model for Glanzmann thrombasthenia showing placental defects and reduced survival. J Clin Invest. 1999;103:229‐238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Ware J, Russell S, Ruggeri ZM. Generation and rescue of a murine model of platelet dysfunction: the Bernard‐Soulier syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:2803‐2808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Sivaraman B, Latour RA. The relationship between platelet adhesion on surfaces and the structure versus the amount of adsorbed fibrinogen. Biomaterials Elsevier Ltd. 2010;31:832‐839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Weisel JW, Litvinov RI. Fibrin formation, structure and properties. Subcell Biochem. 2017;82:405‐456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Springer TA, Zhu J, Xiao T. Structural basis for distinctive recognition of fibrinogen γC peptide by the platelet integrin αIIbβ3. J Cell Biol. 2008;182:791‐800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Nesbitt WS, Kulkarni S, Giuliano S, et al. Distinct glycoprotein Ib/V/IX and integrin αIIbβ3‐dependent calcium signals cooperatively regulate platelet adhesion under flow. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:2965‐2972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Reheman A, Yang H, Zhu G, et al. Plasma fibronectin depletion enhances platelet aggregation and thrombus formation in mice lacking fibrinogen and von Willebrand factor. Blood. 2009;113:1809‐1817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Bastida E, Escolar G, Ordinas A, Sixma JJ. Fibronectin is required for platelet adhesion and for thrombus formation on subendothelium and collagen surfaces. Blood. 1987;70:1437‐1442. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Konitsiotis AD, Raynal N, Bihan D, Hohenester E, Farndale RW, Leitinger B. Characterization of high affinity binding motifs for the discoidin domain receptor DDR2 in collagen. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:6861‐6868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Hamaia SW, Pugh N, Raynal N, et al. Mapping of potent and specific binding motifs, GLOGEN and GVOGEA, for integrin 1αβ1 using collagen toolkits II and III. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:26019‐26028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Xu H, Raynal N, Stathopoulos S, Myllyharju J, Farndale RW, Leitinger B. Collagen binding specificity of the discoidin domain receptors: Binding sites on collagens II and III and molecular determinants for collagen IV recognition by DDR1. Matrix Biol International Society of Matrix Biology. 2011;30:16‐26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Lebbink RJ, Raynal N, de Ruiter T, Bihan D, Farndale RW, Meyaard L. Identification of multiple potent binding sites for human leukocyte associated Ig‐like receptor LAIR on collagens II and III. Matrix Biol Elsevier B.V. and International Society of Matrix Biology. 2009;28:202‐210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Howes JM, Bihan D, Slatter DA, et al. The recognition of collagen and triple‐helical toolkit peptides by MMP‐13: Sequence specificity for binding and cleavage. J Biol Chem. 2014;289:24091‐24101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Barrow AD, Raynal N, Andersen TL, et al. OSCAR is a collagen receptor that costimulates osteoclastogenesis in DAP12‐deficient humans and mice. J Clin Invest. 2011;121:3505‐3516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Vadon‐Le Goff S, Kronenberg D, Bourhis JM, et al. Procollagen C‐proteinase enhancer stimulates procollagen processing by binding to the C‐propeptide region only. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:38932‐38938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Giudici C, Raynal N, Wiedemann H, et al. Mapping of SPARC/BM‐40/osteonectin‐binding sites on fibrillar collagens. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:19551‐19560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Kalamajski S, Bihan D, Bonna A, Rubin K, Farndale RW. Fibromodulin interacts with collagen cross‐linking sites and activates lysyl oxidase. J Biol Chem. 2016;291:7951‐7960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Jarvis GE, Raynal N, Langford JP, et al. Identification of a major GpVI‐binding locus in human type III collagen. Blood. 2008;111:4986‐4996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Pugh N, Simpson AMC, Smethurst PA, De Groot PG, Raynal N, Farndale RW. Synergism between platelet collagen receptors defined using receptor‐specific collagen‐mimetic peptide substrata in flowing blood. Blood. 2010;115:5069‐5079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Eckly A, Hechler B, Freund M, et al. Mechanisms underlying FeCl3‐induced arterial thrombosis. J Thromb Haemost. 2011;9:779‐789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Barr JD, Chauhan AK, Schaeffer GV, Hansen JK, Motto DG. Red blood cells mediate the onset of thrombosis in the ferric chloride murine model. Blood. 2013;121:3733‐3741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Ciciliano JC, Sakurai Y, Myers DR, et al. Resolving the multifaceted mechanisms of the ferric chloride thrombosis model using an interdisciplinary microfluidic approach. Blood. 2015;126:817‐824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Knight CG, Morton LF, Onley DJ, et al. Collagen‐platelet interaction: Gly‐Pro‐Hyp is uniquely specific for platelet Gp VI and mediates platelet activation by collagen. Cardiovasc Res. 1999;41:450‐457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Jeimy SB, Fuller N, Tasneem S, et al. Multimerin 1 binds factor V and activated factor V with high affinity and inhibits thrombin generation. Thromb Haemost. 2008;100:1058‐1067. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Ricard S. The collagen family. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2011;3:1‐19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Di Lullo GA, Sweeney SM, Korkko J, Ala‐Kokko L, San Antonio JD. Mapping the ligand‐binding sites and disease‐associated mutations on the most abundant protein in the human, type I collagen. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:4223‐4231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. De Paepe A, Malfait F. The Ehlers‐Danlos syndrome, a disorder with many faces. Clin Genet. 2012;82:1‐11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Bodian DL, Chan TF, Poon A, et al. Mutation and polymorphism spectrum in osteogenesis imperfecta type II: implications for genotype‐phenotype relationships. Hum Mol Genet. 2009;18:463‐471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Jalan AA, Sammon D, Hartgerink JD, et al. Chain alignment of collagen I deciphered using computationally designed heterotrimers. Nat Chem Biol. 2020;16:423‐429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.