Abstract
Introduction
Pregnancy is a beautiful phase in every woman's life in which she undergoes several physical and psychological transformations. The level of stress and anxiety may increase due to a sudden outbreak of contagious diseases.
Objective
To evaluate the psychological status of pregnant women during the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) outbreak.
Materials and methods
A cross-sectional survey was conducted from July 15, 2020, to September 15, 2020, in Dehradun, Haridwar, and Nainital districts of Uttarakhand, India. A total of 333 pregnant women were surveyed through an online platform. The psychological impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic was measured using the Impact of Event-Revised (IES-R) scale, and anxiety levels were measured using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) scale. Data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics.
Results
The survey results revealed that around three-fourths (73.6%) of the pregnant women reported minimal psychological impact, with a mean IES-R score of 16.93±11.23, whereas 69.4% of respondents had a minimal level of anxiety, with a mean GAD-7 score of 3.09±3.73.
Multivariate linear regression found a positive association between psychological impact and gestational age, occupation, religion, locality, conception, history of abortion (p<0.05). Also, the level of anxiety was significantly associated with education, occupation, monthly income, religion, marital and family support, history of mental illness (p<0.01), conception type, and awareness regarding COVID-19 (p<0.05).
Conclusion
Psychological impact and anxiety levels were found to be minimal in pregnant women residing in Uttarakhand. Early identification of high-risk women is important to formulate necessary strategic planning to reduce the complications associated with maternal psychological stress on developing fetus.
Keywords: coronavirus infection, pandemics, pregnancy, psychology, anxiety
Introduction
Pneumonia of unknown etiology was initially reported in Wuhan on December 31, 2019, located in the Hubei province, in the central part of China [1]. On January 30, 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) identified Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) as the most infectious respiratory disease with a high rate of human-to-human transmission called coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and declared as a global health emergency. As it continued to spread worldwide, affecting around 114 countries and killing more than 4,000 people, WHO officially declared it a pandemic on March 11, 2020 [2].
Pregnancy is one of the most beautiful experiences in a woman's life, in which she undergoes many physical and psychological changes. It gives pride to women to be on the way to becoming new parents, which adds some extra essence to a woman's life. Women may undergo some kind of stress and anxiety during the pregnancy, mainly associated with the fear of potential adverse obstetrical outcomes such as fetal death or fetal abnormalities [3].
The sudden outbreak of COVID-19 with the surge in the number of infected cases and deaths has caused a serious and critical impact on public health, including mental health, which is primarily associated with the symptoms of mental illness such as loneliness, depression, sleep disturbance, anger, etc., not only in health care professional but also among the general public [4]. The risk of depression is higher among pregnant women mainly due to sudden and extreme changes in the daily routine, self-Isolation, social distancing, and stress due to limited follow-up by a physician, and birthing options [5]. The pandemic has also increased the psychological distress, anxiety, and stress among pregnant women due to their uncontrolled worry about their health, the safety of their unborn baby, and quandary about the use of vaccines or medications for prophylaxis and treatment [6]. The intra-uterine development of a fetus entirely depends on the physical as well as the psychological health status of the mother during pregnancy [7].
A recent study indicates that pregnant women are more prone to anxiety and depression during the COVID-19 outbreak, which is mainly associated with their age, cultural status, and the duration of pregnancy [7]. Unrelenting and prominent prenatal anxiety and depression symptoms may increase the risk of postnatal depression, as well as postpartum infection and illness rates [8]. It may affect the maternal mood and development of the fetus due to alteration in physical activity, nutrition, and sleeping pattern in the antenatal period [9]. The risk of miscarriage, preterm labor, lower birth weight, and lower Apgar scores at birth is also associated with prenatal anxiety and depressive symptoms [10]. A mother having a high level of stress during her antenatal period is more likely to induce cognitive and behavioral problems in the baby due to changes in the brain structure [11]. These lifelong psychological and neurological effects focus on the utmost need for effective strategic planning to reduce the impact by targeting maternal stress and providing psychological support that may prevent negative outcomes for both the woman and her baby [12].
The graph of COVID-19 is exponentially increasing daily, but the impact of transmission on the mother's and baby's wellbeing is still not very sure. Uttarakhand is located in India's northern part across the Himalayas, where the current status of COVID-19 is significantly less (0.42%) compared to the total cases (17,52,171) of India [13]. It is a primary responsibility to support one of the vulnerable groups of society - pregnant women - to access safe maternity services and early detection and treatment of ailments [14]. Currently, there is insufficient information available on the psychological impact of COVID-19 on the mental health of pregnant women in Uttarakhand. So, the present study aimed to survey pregnant women to evaluate psychological effects and anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Materials and methods
Study design
This cross-sectional online survey was carried out using Google Forms application (Google LLC, Mountain View, CA, USA) in the Hindi language and the web link was circulated through the WhatsApp messenger app (Facebook, Inc., Menlo Park, CA, USA) to assess the psychological impact and anxiety level among pregnant women due to sudden outbreak of COVID-19.
Participants
All the pregnant women without any history of psychiatric illness and not diagnosed with COVID-19 were included in the survey. The details of the pregnant mothers were collected from the Primary Health Centers (PHCs) and Community Health Centers (CHCs) of Dehradun, Haridwar, and Nanital districts through Accredited Social Health Activist (ASHA) workers. A total of 21 ASHA workers were contacted from Dehradun (9), Haridwar (8), and Nanital (4) districts. A total of 798 pregnant mothers' contact details were received. Telephonic calls were made to them to explain the objectives of the study and to obtain the preliminary data regarding pregnancy status and access to an android phone. Out of them, 550 women agreed to participate in the study, 44 women's contact numbers were not working, and 204 refused to participate in the study. The web link was sent to the 550 pregnant women, out of which 333 completed the survey. In the present study, the convenience sampling method was adopted. The data collection was carried out from July 15, 2020, to September 15, 2020.
Based on the estimated population size of 2,500 pregnant women in the selected geographical area, 95% confidence level, and 5% margin of error, it was estimated that the required sample size will be 333 participants for this study.
Ethical considerations
Ethical approval was obtained from the institutional ethics committee vide with letter no. AIIMS/IEC/20/ dated August 22, 2020. The participants were well informed about the purpose of the survey. An informed electronic written consent was obtained from each participant before they responded to the online survey questions. Confidentiality of information and anonymity of the participants was maintained.
Study tools
The online survey was conducted using a standardized tool. The first part of the study questionnaire consisted of socio-demographic characteristics of participants, including age, parity, gestational age, family, monthly income, conception, history of abortion, and knowledge regarding COVID-19. The second part of the survey comprised self-report questionnaires from the standardized tool (Impact of Event-Revised [IES-R] scale and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 [GAD-7] scale) to assess the psychological impact and anxiety due to COVID-19. The total time taken to fill all the forms was 15-20 minutes.
The IES-R scale, developed by Andreas Maercker and Matthias Schützwohl in 1998, was used to measure the effect of routine life stress, everyday traumas, and acute stress during the COVID-19 pandemic [15]. The IES-R is a short, easily administered self-report questionnaire containing 22 items. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale ranging between 0 (not at all) and 4 (extremely), reflecting the extent to which a stressful life event or a problem bothered the respondent for the past seven days. The items that compose the scale include eight for intrusion symptoms, eight for avoidance and numbing symptoms, and six for arousal symptoms [16]. The higher the score, the higher is the psychological impact, with a maximum score of 88, which indicates the worst PTSS (post-traumatic stress syndrome) state. According to Creamer et al., the psychological impact of IES-R score was classified as normal (0-23), mild (24-32), moderate (33-36), and severe (>37) [17,18]. Also, this tool is free to use and has been utilised by various studies [19,20] in the Indian population to assess psychological impact.
Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) is a self-reported, seven-item anxiety scale developed by Spitzer et al. to measure the frequency of general anxiety symptoms that occurs within the past two weeks [21]. It is an online, free-to-use tool, also available in the Hindi language, and has been applied in various research settings and populations. It is a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (never) to 3 (nearly every day). The total score ranges from 0-21: without anxiety symptoms (0-4), with mild anxiety symptoms (5-9), with moderate anxiety symptoms (10-14), and with severe anxiety symptoms (15-21). The increasing scores indicating more severe functional impairments as a result of anxiety [21].
Statistical analysis
The collected data was organized by Google Sheets (Google LLC, Mountain View, CA, USA) and transferred to Excel sheets (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA) and all statistical analyses were performed by using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version-20 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Descriptive statistics were calculated for socio-demographic characteristics and were presented using frequency and percentage. Anxiety scores and psychological impact scores were also expressed in frequency and percentage. The Chi-square test was used to determine the correlation between IES-R and GAD-7 scores.
Multivariate regression analysis was employed to assess the association of psychological impact and anxiety with the socio-demographic characteristics of pregnant women. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Characteristics of survey respondents
The response rate was 60.5% (550/333) in the current study. The majority (78.7%) of the participants were in the age group of 21 to 30 years. More than half were primigravida (61.9%) and in the third trimester of pregnancy (53.5%). Most of the subjects (88.9%) claimed to get family support during their pregnancy (Table 1).
Table 1. Socio-demographic profile of pregnant women (N=333).
| Variables | Frequency | % |
| Age | ||
| Less than 20 years | 0 | 0 |
| 21-30 years | 262 | 78.7 |
| More than 30 years | 71 | 21.3 |
| Education | ||
| Illiterate | 20 | 6.0 |
| Primary school | 69 | 20.7 |
| Secondary school | 143 | 42.9 |
| Graduate and above | 101 | 30.3 |
| Occupation | ||
| Homemaker | 191 | 57.4 |
| Business | 26 | 7.8 |
| Private job | 33 | 9.9 |
| Government job | 48 | 14.4 |
| Health care worker | 35 | 14.4 |
| Monthly income | ||
| Rs. Less than 5,000 | 75 | 22.5 |
| Rs.5,001-10,000 | 111 | 33.3 |
| Rs. 10,001-15,000 | 42 | 12.6 |
| Rs.15,001-20,000 | 61 | 18.3 |
| Rs. 20,001 and above | 44 | 13.2 |
| Religion | ||
| Hindu | 291 | 87.4 |
| Muslim | 21 | 6.3 |
| Christian | 9 | 2.7 |
| Others | 12 | 3.6 |
| Residence | ||
| Urban | 159 | 47.7 |
| Rural | 101 | 30.3 |
| Semi-urban | 73 | 21.9 |
| Family type | ||
| Nuclear | 142 | 42.6 |
| Joint | 191 | 57.4 |
| Family support | ||
| Yes | 296 | 88.9 |
| No | 37 | 11.1 |
A large number (77.8%) of participants did not have any co-morbidities in pregnancy. A vast number (97%) of participants reported not having any history of mental illness and had a spontaneous conception (96.4%). Almost three-fourth (74.2%) did not have any previous history of abortion. All the study participants were aware of COVID-19 (Table 2).
Table 2. General health and pregnancy profile of pregnant women (N=333).
HTN: hypertension; DM: diabetes mellitus; COVID-19: coronavirus disease 2019
| Pregnancy profile | Frequency | % |
| Parity | ||
| Primigravida | 206 | 61.9 |
| Multigravida | 127 | 38.1 |
| Gestational age | ||
| 1st trimester | 43 | 12.9 |
| 2nd trimester | 112 | 33.6 |
| 3rd trimester | 178 | 53.5 |
| Conception type | ||
| Spontaneous | 321 | 96.4 |
| Infertility treatment | 12 | 3.6 |
| History of abortion | ||
| Yes | 86 | 25.8 |
| No | 247 | 74.2 |
| General health profile | frequency | % |
| Presence of co-morbidities | ||
| Yes | 74 | 22.2 |
| No | 259 | 77.8 |
| If yes specify | ||
| Gestational HTN | 17 | 5.1 |
| Gestational DM | 11 | 3.3 |
| Thyroid | 29 | 8.7 |
| Other | 17 | 5.1 |
| History of any mental illness | ||
| Yes | 10 | 3 |
| No | 323 | 97 |
| Awareness regarding COVID-19 | ||
| Yes | 333 | 100 |
| No | 0 | 0 |
| If yes, specify source | ||
| Family/friends | 92 | 27.6 |
| Newspaper/magazine | 35 | 10.5 |
| Social media | 103 | 30.9 |
| News/radio | 39 | 11.7 |
| Health care worker | 64 | 19.2 |
Psychological impact
The psychological impact of the COVID-19 outbreak was measured by the IES-R scale, which demonstrated that the mean IES-R score was 16.93 ± 11.23. The majority of respondents (73.6%) had a minimal psychological impact (IES-R score of 0-23) from the COVID-19 outbreak. About one-fifth of the pregnant women (18.3%) had a mild psychological impact (IES-R score of 24-32), whereas 3% and 5.1% of them reported having a moderate and severe psychological impact with IES-R score of 33-36 and >36, respectively (Table 3).
Table 3. Psychological impact and level of anxiety in response to COVID-19 outbreak (N=333).
COVID-19: coronavirus disease 2019
| Psychological impact (Scores) | Frequency (%) | Anxiety (Scores) | Frequency (%) | r (p-value) |
| Normal (0-23) | 245 (73.6) | No anxiety (0-4) | 231 (69.4) | 0.5 (<0.01) |
| Mild (24-32) | 61 (18.3) | Mild (5-9) | 80 (24.0) | |
| Moderate (33–36) | 10 (3.0) | Moderate (10-14) | 18 (5.4) | |
| Severe (≥37) | 17 (5.1) | Severe (15-21) | 4 (1.2) | |
| Mean ±SD | 16.9±11.2 | Mean ±SD | 3.09±3.7 |
Anxiety level
The anxiety level due to the COVID-19 outbreak was measured by the GAD-7 scale, which displayed the mean GAD-7 score as 3.09 ± 3.73. The majority of respondents (69.4%) had minimal anxiety levels (GAD-7 score of 0-4) due to the COVID-19 outbreak, while 24% and 5.4% of the participants experienced mild and moderate anxiety levels with GAD-7 score of 5-9 and 10-14, respectively. However, 1.2% of the respondents rated the anxiety level as severe (GAD-7 score of 15-21) (Table 3).
Association of psychological impact with anxiety score
A significant association was traced between GAD-7 and IES-R (r=0.500, p<0.05) (Table 3).
Association of psychological impact scores with socio-demographic variables
Multivariate linear regression suggested a significant association between gestational age (p<0.01), occupation (p<0.01), religion (p<0.01), locality (p=0.05), conception (p<0.01), history of abortion (p=0.01), and awareness regarding COVID-19 (p=0.03) with psychological impact scores (Table 4).
Table 4. Association of psychological impact score with socio-demographic characteristics of pregnant women (N=333).
COVID-19: coronavirus disease 2019
| Variables | Unstandardized Beta | Standardized Beta | 95% CI | p-value |
| Age | 0.087 | 0.046 | 0.076-1.073 | 0.435 |
| Parity | 0.050 | 0.032 | -0.597-0.142 | 0.541 |
| Gestational age | 0.287 | 0.260 | 0.093-0.651 | 0.000 |
| Education | 0.024 | 0.026 | -0.169-0267 | 0.626 |
| Occupation | 0.104 | 0.197 | 0.032-0.284 | 0.000 |
| Monthly income | -0.031 | -0.054 | -0.059-0.216 | 0.314 |
| Residence | -0.101 | -0.103 | -0.108-0.341 | 0.045 |
| Family | 0.110 | 0.070 | -0.14-0.594 | 0.181 |
| Marital and family support | 0.033 | 0.013 | -0.451-0.78 | 0.809 |
| Presence of comorbidities | -0.144 | -0.077 | -0.796-1.355 | 0.548 |
| Comorbidities | 0.063 | 0.097 | -0.093-0.631 | 0.436 |
| History of mental illness | 0.306 | 0.067 | -0.755-1.369 | 0.197 |
| Conception | 0.793 | 0.190 | 0.505-2.59 | 0.001 |
| History of abortion | 0.248 | 0.139 | -0.11-0.774 | 0.012 |
| Awareness regarding COVID-19 | -0.068 | -0.126 | -0.272-0.004 | 0.028 |
Association of anxiety scores with socio-demographic variables
In the multivariate linear regression, there was a significant association between parity (p=0.040), education (p=0.002), occupation (p<0.01), monthly income (p<0.01), religion (p<0.01), marital and family support (p<0.05), history of mental illness (p<0.01), conception (p<0.01), awareness regarding COVID-19 with anxiety scores (Table 5).
Table 5. Association of anxiety score with socio-demographic characteristics of pregnant women (N=333).
COVID-19: coronavirus disease 2019
| Variables | Unstandardized Beta | Standardized Beta | 95% CI | p-value |
| Age | -0.087 | -0.055 | -0.173-0.181 | 0.322 |
| Parity | 0.134 | 0.101 | -0.047-0.216 | 0.040 |
| Gestational age | 0.095 | 0.104 | 0.008-0.206 | 0.054 |
| Education | 0.117 | 0.157 | -0.015-0.14 | 0.002 |
| Occupation | 0.093 | 0.212 | 0.042-0.131 | 0.000 |
| Monthly income | -0.090 | -0.188 | -0.115- -0.017 | 0.000 |
| Residence | 0.005 | 0.006 | 0.031-0.241 | 0.905 |
| Family | 0.063 | 0.048 | -0.065-0.195 | 0.328 |
| Marital and family support | -0.244 | -0.119 | -0.455- -0.017 | 0.025 |
| Presence of comorbidities | -0.053 | -0.034 | -0.4770.288 | 0.780 |
| Comorbidities | 0.046 | 0.086 | -0.109-0.149 | 0.471 |
| History of mental illness | -1.412 | -0.373 | -1.576- -0.821 | 0.000 |
| Conception | 0.688 | 0.198 | 0.098-0.84 | 0.000 |
| History of abortion | 0.043 | 0.029 | -0.07-0.244 | 0.582 |
| Awareness regarding COVID | -0.085 | -0.191 | -0.126- -0.027 | 0.001 |
Discussion
This was a cross-sectional survey to assess the psychological impact and anxiety in pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic in Uttarakhand. The results of the present study showed that the COVID-19 outbreak had a minimal-to-mild psychological impact on pregnant women with a mean IES-R score of 16.93±11.23. Around 73.6% of pregnant women have reported minimal psychological impact, whereas 18.3% had a mild psychological impact, 3% had moderate and 5.1% reported severe psychological impact due to the COVID-19 outbreak.
The findings of the study suggest that the COVID-19 pandemic is not causing a serious effect on the psychological status of the pregnant women residing in Uttarakhand, but it is important to perform effective strategic planning to identify the pregnant mothers who are at risk of developing psychological distress and take appropriate actions to prevent aftereffects. The study results are incongruent with similar studies from other nations.
A similar study in Italy found that the COVID-19 outbreak caused a moderate psychological impact on pregnant women, and around 53% of respondents reported severe psychological impact [22]. A study done in Bosnia and Herzegovina and Serbia reported that around that 34.2% of respondents experienced a severe psychological impact, 9.9% experienced moderate, and 23.0% of respondents had mild psychological impact due to the COVID-19 outbreak [23]. Another study done in China showed that the mean IES score of pregnant women was higher than the present study, with 67.1% of pregnant women had an IES ⩾26, indicating moderate-to-severe psychological impact during the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic [24]. Most of these studies were conducted during the initial phase of the COVID-19 outbreak in the country and it could be the reason for escalated psychological impact in pregnant mothers, which might have changed over time.
A large number (69.4%) of pregnant mothers reported minimal level of anxiety due to sudden outbreak of COVID-19, whereas 24% reported mild anxiety level, 5.4% reported moderate anxiety level, and 1.2% reported severe level of anxiety. The prevalence of anxiety during a pandemic would be due to the fear of not receiving necessary prenatal care [25].
The anxiety levels are mainly associated with stress, psychological distress caused by the outbreak of COVID-19, which has led to serious psychological challenges for pregnant women causing both long-term and short-term effects on the baby.
Similar to the present study findings, a study from Belgium reported that 47% of respondents had a minimal level of anxiety, 39.4% mild, 8.4% moderate, and 5.2% severe level of anxiety experienced by pregnant mothers [26]. Whereas a study from Canada reported that a higher proportion (57%) of pregnant women reported a higher level of anxiety symptoms, mainly associated with the fear of transmission to a baby as well as concern about poor prenatal care, relationship problem, and social isolation due to the COVID-19 pandemic [25]. The pandemic had caused a significant increase in the level of anxiety among pregnant women, which is mainly associated with the over concern for their older relatives, children, followed by their unborn baby [27]. In another study from Italy, 46% of pregnant women reported a high level of anxiety due to fear of vertical transmission of the disease to a baby as assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) anxiety score ≥of 50 [22]. The study results in Colorado reported 12% of respondents had high depressive symptomology and around 60% reported moderate or severe anxiety symptoms [28].
The present study results suggested that gestational age, occupation, religion, residence, method of conception, history of any abortion, awareness regarding COVID-19 were a predictor for higher psychological impact among pregnant mothers in response to COVID-19, whereas parity, education level, occupation, monthly income, religion, marital and family support, history of mental illness, method of conception, and awareness regarding COVID-19 were the factors associated with the level of anxiety among pregnant mothers.
A study from China has reported that pregnant women who were less than 35 years, underweight, primipara, middle-income, full-time working women, and residing in a per capita living area of ≥20m2 experience more depressive and anxiety symptoms [12]. Whereas a study from Italy has reported that higher educational status was significantly associated with an increase in the prevalence of state-trait anxiety inventory (STAI-S) values [29], and another study from China stated that the gestational age is causing more psychological impact on pregnant women as the second trimester of pregnancy has IES >26 than pregnant women in the first and third trimesters of pregnancy [24]. Another study done in Pakistan specified a positive association of selected demographic variables with anxiety and psychologically related symptoms [30].
This study is a cross-sectional survey that lacks a longitudinal follow-up of the pregnant mother to study the effects on the outcome of pregnancy. Another limitation is that the study has used convenience sampling, so coverage of a broad sample would be limited to geographical specific.
Conclusions
This study examined the psychological impact and anxiety of the COVID-19 outbreak on pregnant women in Uttarakhand. The present study concludes that the majority of pregnant women had a minimal psychological impact and anxiety-related symptoms. However, it is essential to assess the stress and plan effective strategies to reduce the psychological impact of the pandemic on pregnant women by providing psychological support, including clarifying their misconceptions about risks of vertical transmission to the growing fetus, risk of congenital malformations, and route of delivery, which may prevent negative outcomes for both the woman and the fetus.
The content published in Cureus is the result of clinical experience and/or research by independent individuals or organizations. Cureus is not responsible for the scientific accuracy or reliability of data or conclusions published herein. All content published within Cureus is intended only for educational, research and reference purposes. Additionally, articles published within Cureus should not be deemed a suitable substitute for the advice of a qualified health care professional. Do not disregard or avoid professional medical advice due to content published within Cureus.
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Human Ethics
Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh issued approval AIIMS/IEC/20/ dated 22 Aug. 2020.
Animal Ethics
Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue.
References
- 1.A novel coronavirus outbreak of global health concern. Wang C, Horby PW, Hayden FG, Gao GF. Lancet. 2020;395:470–473. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30185-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.World Health Organization declares global emergency: a review of the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) Sohrabi C, Alsafi Z, O’Neill N, et al. Int J Surg. 2020;76:71–76. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.02.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Identifying the women at risk of antenatal anxiety and depression: a systematic review. Biaggi A, Conroy S, Pawlby S, et al. J Affect Disord. 2016;191:62–77. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.11.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Impact of COVID- 19: nursing perspective and concern. Sharma R, Vishwas AS, Jelly P. Int J Community Med Public Heal. 2020;7:4648–4652. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Psychological health during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic outbreak. Mukhtar S. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2020;66:512–516. doi: 10.1177/0020764020925835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Psychological impact of infectious disease outbreaks on pregnant women: rapid evidence review. Brooks S, Weston D, Greenberg N. Public health. 2020;189:26–36. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.09.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Psychological investigation on pregnant women during the outbreak of COVID-19. Chen S, Zhuang J, Chen Q, Tan X. Research Square. 2020;Preprint (Version 2) [Google Scholar]
- 8.Trajectories of perinatal depressive and anxiety symptoms in a community cohort. Bayrampour H, Tomfohr L, Tough S. J Clin Psychiatry. 2016;77:1467–1473. doi: 10.4088/JCP.15m10176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Effects of prenatal stress on pregnancy and human development: mechanisms and pathways. Coussons-Read ME. Obstet Med. 2013;6:52–57. doi: 10.1177/1753495X12473751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Maternal anxiety during pregnancy and the association with adverse perinatal outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. Grigoriadis S, Graves L, Peer M, et al. J Clin Psychiatry. 2018;79:17. doi: 10.4088/JCP.17r12011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Maternal depression, anxiety and stress during pregnancy and child outcome; what needs to be done. Glover V. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;28:25–35. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2013.08.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Perinatal depressive and anxiety symptoms of pregnant women during the coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak in China. Wu Y, Zhang C, Liu H, et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;223:240–241. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.05.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Coronavirus outbreak in India - covid19india.org. [Jan;2021 ];https://www.covid19india.org/ 2020
- 14.Clinical update on COVID-19 in pregnancy: a review article. Ryan GA, Purandare NC, McAuliffe FM, Hod M, Purandare CN. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2020;46:1235–1245. doi: 10.1111/jog.14321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.The Impact of Event Scale - Revised (IES-R) Christianson S, Marren J. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23243796/ Medsurg Nurs. 2012;21:321–322. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Methodology of developing a smartphone application for crisis research and its clinical application. Zhang MWB, Ho CSH, Fang P, Lu Y, Ho RCM. Technol Heal Care. 2014;22:547–559. doi: 10.3233/THC-140819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Psychometric properties of the Impact of Event Scale. Creamer M, Bell R, Failla S. Behav Res Ther. 2003;41:1489–1496. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2003.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.The Impact of Event Scale-Revised: psychometric properties in a sample of motor vehicle accident survivors. Beck JG, Grant DMM, Read JP, Clapp JD, Coffey SF, Miller LM, Palyo SA. J Anxiety Disord. 2008;22:187–198. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2007.02.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Initial psychological impact of COVID-19 and its correlates in Indian community: an online (FEEL-COVID) survey. Varshney M, Parel JT, Raizada N, Sarin SK. PLoS One. 2020;15:233874. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Psychological well-being in primary survivors of Uttarakhand disaster in India. Verma R, Chandra M, Sharma S, Sharma S, Mina S, Singh Balhara Y. Indian J Soc Psychiatry. 2015;31:29–36. [Google Scholar]
- 21.A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JBW, Löwe B. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:1092–1097. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Psychological impact of coronavirus disease 2019 in pregnant women. Saccone G, Florio A, Aiello F, et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;223:293–295. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.05.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on pregnant women in Bosnia and Herzegovina and Serbia. Tutnjević S, Lakić S. PsyArXiv. 2020 [Google Scholar]
- 24.Psychological responses and lifestyle changes among pregnant women with respect to the early stages of COVID-19 pandemic. Zhang Y, Ma ZF. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2020;2076402095211 doi: 10.1177/0020764020952116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Elevated depression and anxiety symptoms among pregnant individuals during the COVID-19 pandemic. Lebel C, MacKinnon A, Bagshawe M, Tomfohr-Madsen L, Giesbrecht G. J Affect Disord. 2020;277:5–13. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.07.126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Mental health status of pregnant and breastfeeding women during the COVID‐19 pandemic: a call for action. Ceulemans M, Hompes T, Foulon V. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2020;151:13295. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Health anxiety and behavioural changes of pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic. Corbett GA, Milne SJ, Hehir MP, Lindow SW, O’connell MP. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020;249:96–97. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.04.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.A mixed-methods pilot study of perinatal risk and resilience during COVID-19. Farewell CV, Jewell J, Walls J, Leiferman JA. J Prim Care Community Heal. 2020;11:215013272094407. doi: 10.1177/2150132720944074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Effects of coronavirus 19 pandemic on maternal anxiety during pregnancy: a prospectic observational study. Mappa I, Distefano FA, Rizzo G. J Perinat Med. 2020;48:545–550. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2020-0182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Evaluation of psychological impact, depression, and anxiety among pregnant women during the COVID‐19 pandemic in Lahore, Pakistan. Shahid A, Javed A, Rehman S, Tariq R, Ikram M, Suhail M. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2020;151:462–465. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
