Table 3.
Adjusted Associations Between IPV Firearm Policy Climate and Nonfatal Injuries: NISVS Participants Who Experience IPV, United States, 2010
| Independent Variables | aOR (95% CI) | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| Prohibition of firearm possession by persons convicted of IPV-related misdemeanors | REF | |
| No Firearm relinquishment | 1.04 (.84, 1.30) | 0.09 |
| Firearm relinquishment | .76 (.59, .97) | 0.01 |
| Prohibition of firearm possession by persons subject to IPV-related restraining orders | REF | |
| No Firearm relinquishment | 1.01 (.76, 1.33) | 0.39 |
| Firearm relinquishment | .81 (.66, .98) | 0.03 |
| Prohibition of firearm possession by persons convicted of stalking | .82 (.68, .98) | 0.02 |
| Removal of firearms from the scene of an IPV incident | .90 (.74, 1.10) | 0.30 |
| Prohibition of firearm possession by dating persons convicted of IPV-related misdemeanors | 1.08 (.88, 1.34) | 0.44 |
| Prohibition of firearm possession by dating persons convicted of IPV-related protective orders | .83 (.67, 1.00) | 0.05 |
aOR Adjusted odds ratio, CI Confidence interval. Adjusted analyses included individual-level characteristics (i.e., age, gender, race and ethnicity, and education) and state-level characteristics (i.e., firearm ownership, violent crime)