Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 21;80(3):210–219. doi: 10.1093/jnen/nlab001

TABLE 2.

Demographic Features and Evaluation Results of CTE Study Cases

Case Age/Sex Sport (Duration, Year) Submission Dx (Stage) Evaluation (CTE Dx)
Outcome (✓)
Round 1 Round 2
16 23/M FB (9) CTE (I) No diagnostic pathology Eliminated
23 25/M FB (15) CTE (II) 8/8 8/8 Low CTE (3)
15 27/M FB (14) CTE (II) 8/8 8/8 Low CTE (4)
5 38/M FB (14) CTE (II) No diagnostic pathology Eliminated
14 40/M FB (13) CTE (III) 6/8 7/8 High CTE (10)
27 41/M FB (17) CTE (III) 7/8 8/8 High CTE (7)
21 46/M FB (20) CTE (III) 8/8 8/8 High CTE (9)
17 48/M FB (17) CTE (III) 8/8 8/8 High CTE (7)
25 49/M FB (23) CTE (III) 8/8 8/8 High CTE (9)
29 53/M FB (15) CTE (III) 4/8 7/8 High CTE (8)
1 53/M FB (14) CTE (III) 8/8 8/8 High CTE (7)
8 61/M BX (26) CTE (III) 8/8 8/8 High CTE (10)
6 66/M FB (17) CTE (III) 8/8 8/8 High CTE (9)
7 66/M FB (16) CTE (III) 8/8 8/8 High CTE (6)
9 69/M FB (28) CTE (IV) 8/8 8/8 High CTE (10)
20 68/M FB (19) CTE (IV) 7/8 8/8 High CTE (10)
18 70/M FB (≥8) CTE (III) 6/8 8/8 High CTE (5)
11 75/M FB (18) CTE (IV) 4/8 6/8 High CTE (8)
24 82/M FB (12) CTE (IV) 6/8 8/8 High CTE (10)

CTE, chronic traumatic encephalopathy; Dx, diagnosis; FB, football; M, male; Outcome (✓), the results of the workflow protocol for the assessment of high and low CTE, number in brackets represents the number of regions with NFTs (derived from Workflow Diagram).