Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 3;479(1):84–91. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001462

Table 2.

Survival at different times of follow-up for different endpoints

Re-revision 10-year failure rate (95% CI) Number at risk 15-year failure rate (95% CI) Number at risk 20-year failure rate (95% CI) Number at risk
Survival complete revision THA
 Re-revision for any reason (events = 11) 13% (4 to 26) 22 27% (13 to 44) 13 38% (19 to 57) 4
 Re-revision for aseptic loosening (events = 6) 3% (0 to 13) 22 10% (3 to 25) 13 21% (7 to 40) 4
 Reoperation for any reason (events = 12) 22% (10 to 37) 19 30% (15 to 46) 12 41% (22 to 60) 3
Survival acetabular components only
 Re-revision for any reason (events = 11) 13% (4 to 26) 22 27% (13 to 44) 13 38% (19 to 57) 4
 Re-revision for aseptic loosening (events = 6) 3% (0 to 13) 22 10% (3 to 25) 13 21% (7 to 40) 4
 Reoperation for any reason (events = 12) 22% (10 to 37) 19 30% (15 to 46) 12 41% (22 to 60) 3
Survival femoral components only
 Re-revision for any reason (events = 7) 10% (2 to 23) 23 21% (8 to 37) 14 21% (8 to 37) 4
 Re-revision for aseptic loosening (events = 2) 0% (NA) 23 4% (0 to 16) 14 4% (0 to 16) 4
 Reoperation for any reason (events = 8) 19% (8 to 34) 20 23% (10 to 39) 13 23% (10 to 39) 3