Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 19;479(3):434–444. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001569

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

A-I Perceptions of diversity and inclusion in orthopaedic surgery among various demographic groups before and after a clinical rotation. t-tests were used to compare scores between majority and nonmajority groups for each diversity category (cis-men versus cis-women, white versus underrepresented racial minority, white versus other race/ethnicity, and heterosexual versus nonheterosexual). (A) Prerotation, cis-women and underrepresented racial minorities believed less than cis-men and white students, respectively, that diversity and inclusion are part of orthopaedic surgery culture. (B) Prerotation, cis-women believed that orthopaedic surgery is less diverse than did cis-men. (C) Prerotation, cis-women believed that orthopaedic surgery is more sexist than cis-men. (D) Prerotation and postrotation, cis-women believed they would have to work harder than others to be valued equally on the rotation compared with cis-men. (E) Prerotation and postrotation, cis-women indicated lower likelihood of pursuing orthopaedic surgery compared with cis-men. There were no differences between demographic groups within each diversity category on: (F) friendliness of orthopaedic surgery, (G) how homophobic orthopaedic surgery is perceived to be, (H) how racist orthopaedic surgery is perceived to be, or (I) the importance of diversity in selecting a specialty. aSignificance was assessed at Bonferroni-adjusted α = 0.0125.