Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 2;17(2):527–536. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1776545

Table 2.

Item responses of knowledge and perceptions related to pneumococcal vaccination (PV) (n = 750)

  % Mean (SD)
Knowledge related to pneumococcal diseases and PV    
Whether diseases caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae have more severe consequences among elderly individuals    
No 1.7  
Yes* 59.9  
Uncertain 38.4  
Whether healthy people can carry Streptococcus pneumoniae    
No 9.0  
Yes* 22.5  
Uncertain 68.5  
Whether Streptococcus pneumoniae can be transmitted distantly in the air (e.g., from one building to another)    
No* 10.4  
Yes 7.5  
Uncertain 82.1  
Whether pneumococcal pneumonia can be cured by antibiotics    
No 7.4  
Yes* 12.7  
Uncertain 79.9  
Whether influenza infection would increase the risk of pneumococcal pneumonia    
No 1.6  
Yes* 46.7  
Uncertain 51.7  
Whether Hong Kong SAR government recommends elderly individuals aged ≥65 y to take up PV    
No 8.3  
Yes* 58.5  
Uncertain 33.2  
Whether public hospitals/clinics provides free PV to elderly individuals aged ≥65 y    
No 3.3  
Yes* 38.0  
Uncertain 58.7  
Number of correct responses to knowledge items related to pneumonia and PV    
1–2 36.5  
3–5 53.1  
6–7 10.4  
Perceptions related to pneumococcal diseases and PV    
Perceived susceptibility to pneumococcal diseases without taking up PV (% high/very high)    
Chance of having pneumonia 28.8  
Chance of having severe invasive pneumococcal diseases (e.g., septicemia or meningitis) 26.7  
Perceived Susceptibility Scale   6.4 (1.3)
Perceived benefit of PV for oneself (% agree)    
PV is highly effective in preventing you from pneumonia 43.5  
PV is highly effective in preventing you from severe invasive pneumococcal diseases (e.g., septicemia or meningitis) 14.3  
You will feel at ease after taking up PV 52.4  
Perceived Benefit for Oneself Scale   6.8 (1.5)
Perceived benefit of PV for others (% agree)    
Taking up PV is highly effective in preventing pneumonia transmission in Hong Kong 34.4  
Taking up PV is highly effective in protecting your family members against pneumonia 35.1  
Perceived Benefit for Others Scale    
Perceived barrier of taking up PV (% agree)    
PV is expensive for you 16.1  
You concerned about side-effects of PV 18.9  
The time and venue of PV is inconvenient for you 8.4  
Perceived Barrier Scale   5.1 (1.6)
Perceived cue to action related to PV    
Your significant others suggest you to take up PV    
Disagree/neutral 56.0  
Agree 44.0  
Perceived self-efficacy related to PV    
You are confident to take up PV if you want    
Disagree/neutral 39.1  
Agree 60.9  
Peer influence related to PV    
Number of peers of similar age who have taken up PV    
0 39.2  
1–2 12.8  
3–5 4.8  
>5 1.6  
Uncertain 41.6  
Having peers of similar age who have taken up PV and had severe side-effects (among those who had at least one peer who had taken up PV, n = 144)    
No 95.1  
Yes 4.9  
Having peers of similar age who were infected with pneumonia after receiving PV (among those who had at least one peer who had taken up PV, n = 144)    
No 99.3  
Yes 0.7  
Social media influence related to PV    
Exposure to the information supporting PV on social media (% seldom/sometimes/always)    
Elderly people shared their experience to support PV 33.3  
Friends or family suggested you to receive PV through social media 30.0  
Report about elderly individuals had severe conditions or died of pneumonia (R) 40.0  
Commentary or introduction about PV services provided by government for elderly people 28.6  
Social Media Influence Scale   4.1 (0.5)

*Correct response.

R: reverse scoring.