Skip to main content
PMC home page
Frontiers in Plant Science logoLink to Frontiers in Plant Science
. 2021 Feb 9;11:619417. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.619417

Genome Triplication Leads to Transcriptional Divergence of FLOWERING LOCUS C Genes During Vernalization in the Genus Brassica

Ayasha Akter 1,2, Etsuko Itabashi 3, Tomohiro Kakizaki 3, Keiichi Okazaki 4, Elizabeth S Dennis 5,6, Ryo Fujimoto 1,*
PMCID: PMC7900002  PMID: 33633752

Abstract

The genus Brassica includes oil crops, vegetables, condiments, fodder crops, and ornamental plants. Brassica species underwent a whole genome triplication event after speciation between ancestral species of Brassica and closely related genera including Arabidopsis thaliana. Diploid species such as Brassica rapa and Brassica oleracea have three copies of genes orthologous to each A. thaliana gene, although deletion in one or two of the three homologs has occurred in some genes. The floral transition is one of the crucial events in a plant’s life history, and time of flowering is an important agricultural trait. There is a variation in flowering time within species of the genus Brassica, and this variation is largely dependent on a difference in vernalization requirements. In Brassica, like in A. thaliana, the key gene of vernalization is FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC). In Brassica species, the vernalization response including the repression of FLC expression by cold treatment and the enrichment of the repressive histone modification tri-methylated histone H3 lysine 27 (H3K27me3) at the FLC locus is similar to A. thaliana. B. rapa and B. oleracea each have four paralogs of FLC, and the allotetraploid species, Brassica napus, has nine paralogs. The increased number of paralogs makes the role of FLC in vernalization more complicated; in a single plant, paralogs vary in the expression level of FLC before and after vernalization. There is also variation in FLC expression levels between accessions. In this review, we focus on the regulatory circuits of the vernalization response of FLC expression in the genus Brassica.

Keywords: FLOWERING LOCUS C, vernalization, epigenetics, non-coding RNA, Brassica

Introduction

Brassica is an economically important genus including many agricultural crops such as Chinese cabbage and turnip (Brassica rapa L.), cabbage, broccoli, cauliflower, kale, and kohlrabi (Brassica oleracea L.), and oilseed or rapeseed and rutabaga (Brassica napus L.). Three diploid species, B. rapa, Brassica nigra L., and B. oleracea are denoted as the A, B, and C genomes, respectively. Allotetraploid species, Brassica juncea L. (AABB), Brassica carinata L. (BBCC), and B. napus (AACC) contain two diploid genomes, and this genomic relationship is known as the “Triangle of U” (Nagaharu, 1935). Arabidopsis thaliana L. is a close relative species to the genus Brassica, and both are contained in the Brassicaceae.

The genus Brassica needs vernalization for induction of flowering except for early flowering accessions, which have lost the genes responsible for a vernalization requirement. The length of cold treatment required for a vernalization response varies between accessions within a species; for example, the natural variation in flowering time in B. napus in response to vernalization is characterized into three groups: winter type (high vernalization requirement), semiwinter type (intermediate vernalization requirement), and spring type (low or no vernalization requirement) (Raman et al., 2016).

The molecular mechanism of vernalization is well studied in A. thaliana, and genes involved in vernalization networks have been characterized (Berry and Dean, 2015; Whittaker and Dean, 2017). No one doubts that FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC) is a key gene in vernalization. FLC encodes a MADS-box transcription factor and acts as a floral repressor (Michaels and Amasino, 1999; Sheldon et al., 1999). FLC is expressed before cold exposure, and FRIGIDA (FRI) is involved in activation of FLC expression. FLC expression is repressed during cold exposure through epigenetic regulation (Groszmann et al., 2011; Berry and Dean, 2015; Whittaker and Dean, 2017). Upon return to warm conditions, silencing of FLC is maintained (Berry and Dean, 2015; Whittaker and Dean, 2017).

In the genus Brassica, FLC is also a key gene in the vernalization process, and the mechanism of vernalization in the genus Brassica has much in common with that in A. thaliana (Itabashi et al., 2018). However, molecular mechanisms specific to Brassica have also been identified. In this review, we describe the research findings on vernalization in the genus Brassica.

Multiple Copies of FLC Paralogs Are Generated by Whole Genome Triplication or Allotetrapolyploidization in the Genus Brassica

The tribe Brassiceae has undergone a whole genome triplication after speciation, and the whole genome sequence of B. rapa confirmed the triplication of the B. rapa genome relative to A. thaliana (Wang et al., 2011). The total number of genes in B. rapa is much less than three times the gene number in A. thaliana due to gene loss after the whole genome triplication in B. rapa (Wang et al., 2011). In the genus Brassica, three subgenomes, the least fractioned subgenome (LF) and two more fractionated subgenomes (MF1 and MF2), are recognized. In B. rapa, the LF subgenome retains 70% of A. thaliana orthologs, while 46 and 36% of A. thaliana orthologs are retained in MF1 and MF2 subgenomes, respectively (Wang et al., 2011).

B. rapa has multiple copies of orthologs for each A. thaliana gene. For example, there are two FRI paralogs (BrFRIa, BrFRIb) and four FLC paralogs (BrFLC1, BrFLC2, BrFLC3, BrFLC5) (Table 1; Schranz et al., 2002; Wang et al., 2017; Shea et al., 2018). BrFLC1, BrFLC2, and BrFLC3 are located on LF, MF2, and MF1 subgenomes, respectively, indicating that whole genome triplication state is preserved. However, it is not clear how BrFLC5 was generated (Wang et al., 2011). In B. oleracea, there are two FRI and four FLC paralogs (Table 1), and BoFLC5 is a pseudogene (Schranz et al., 2002; Irwin et al., 2012; Itabashi et al., 2019). The allotetraploid species, B. napus, has four FRI and nine FLC paralogs (Table 1; Chalhoub et al., 2014; Shea et al., 2018; Yi et al., 2018; Schiessl et al., 2019). The relationship of orthologs in FRI and FLC among three species is shown in Table 1.

TABLE 1.

FRI and FLC paralogs in three species of the genus Brassica.

Brassica rapa (AA) var. pekinensis line Chiifu-401-42
 Brassica oleracea (CC) var. capitata line 02-12 Brassica napus European winter oilseed cultivar “Darmor-bzh”
ver. 1.5 ver. 3.0
FLC1 BrFLC1 (A10) Bra009055 BraA10g027720.3C BnaFLC.A10 BnaA10g22080D
BoFLC1 (C09) Bol043693 BnaFLC.C09A BnaC09g46500D
BnaFLC.C09B BnaC09g46540D
FLC2 BrFLC2 (A02) Bra028599 BraA02g003340.3C BnaFLC.A02 BnaA02g00370D
BoFLC2 (C02) BnaFLC.C02 BnaC02g00490D
FLC3 BrFLC3 (A03) Bra006051 BraA03g004170.3C BnaFLC.A03A BnaA03g02820D
BoFLC3 (C03) Bol008758 BnaFLC.C03A BnaC03g04170D
FLC5 BrFLC5 (A03) Bra022771 BraA03g015950.3C BnaFLC.A03B BnaA03g13630D
BoFLC5 (C03) BnaFLC.C03B BnaC03g16530D
FRIa BrFRIa (A03) Bra029192 BraA03g015670.3C BnaFRI.A03 BnaA03g13320D
BoFRIa (C03) Bol028107 Bna.FRI.C03 BnaC03g16130D
FRIb BrFRIb (A10) Bra035723 BraA10g009310.3C BnaFRI.A10 BnaA10g05850D
BoFRIb (C09) Bol004294 Bna.FRI.C09 BnaC09g27290D
Open in a new tab

Multiple copies of orthologs may lead to subfunctionalization in the genus Brassica. In A. thaliana, loss of function of the single-copy AtFRI is the main cause of natural variation in flowering time (Berry and Dean, 2015; Whittaker and Dean, 2017). However, there are few reports of FRI being a major contributor of flowering time variation in the genus Brassica. Since both FRIa and FRIb act as activators of FLC in the genus Brassica (Irwin et al., 2012; Takada et al., 2019), they complement each other so that there is little chance of simultaneous loss of FRI function in nature. In contrast, there are reports that loss of FLC function results in variation in flowering time in the genus Brassica.

Quantitative Trait Locus Analysis Shows That FLC Is a Flowering Time Regulator

To identify the key genes involved in vernalization, quantitative trait locus (QTL) analyses have been performed. QTLs affecting flowering time have been identified in different populations in B. rapa, B. oleracea, and B. napus (Shea et al., 2018). At the beginning of QTL analyses in the genus Brassica, a population derived from early and late flowering parental accessions was used. Some QTLs overlapped with the region covering the FLC gene, and some indicated that loss of FLC function results in early flowering (Kole et al., 2001; Schranz et al., 2002; Lou et al., 2007; Okazaki et al., 2007; Li et al., 2009; Zhao et al., 2010); loss of FLC2 function has been detected in early flowering accessions of B. rapa and B. oleracea (Table 2; Okazaki et al., 2007; Li et al., 2009; Wu et al., 2012). In cauliflower (B. oleracea), there is an association between BoFLC2 allelic variation and floral induction within populations of inbred lines (Ridge et al., 2015).

TABLE 2.

Example of how variation in vernalization requirement arises.

Species Line Vernalization requirement Note References
B. rapa Yellow Sarson (C634) − Low level of BrFLC2 expression in pre-vernalized sample Li et al., 2009
Yellow Sarson (L147) − Deletion in exon 4 and intron 4 in BrFLC2 Wu et al., 2012
Nou-6 (Chinese cabbage) ++ Low repression rate of BrFLC1 and BrFLC5 following vernalization Kakizaki et al., 2011
Tsukena No. 2 (Leafy Green/Tsukena) +++ Low repression rate caused by TE insertion in BrFLC2 and BrFLC3 Kitamoto et al., 2014
B. oleracea Green Comet (broccoli) − Frameshift due to 1-bp deletion in exon 4 of BoFLC2 Okazaki et al., 2007
Inbred lines (cauliflower) − Frameshift due to 1-bp deletion in exon 4 of BoFLC2 Ridge et al., 2015
E9 (purple sprouting broccoli) ++ High reactivation rate of BoFLC2 expression on return to warm condition Irwin et al., 2016
B. napus Westar etc. (spring type) − Loss of BnaFLC.A10 function by TE insertion in the first exon Yin et al., 2020
Loss of BnaFLC.A02 function by TE insertion in the exon 7
NIL L06 (spring type) − Loss of BnaFLC.A02 function by 2,833 bp insertion in the intron 1 Chen et al., 2018
Zhongshuang 11 etc. (semiwinter type) + BnaFLC.A10 expression level before and following vernalization is lower than that in winter type, which may be due to TE insertion in the promoter region Yin et al., 2020
Darmor (European winter type) ++ Higher expression levels of BnaFLC.A02 before vernalization, lower repression rate following vernalization, and higher reactivation rate on return to warm conditions of BnaFLC.A02 Tudor et al., 2020
Tapidor etc. (European winter type) ++ Low rate of BnaFLC.A10 repression following vernalization, which may be due to TE insertion in the promoter region Hou et al., 2012; Yin et al., 2020
Open in a new tab

−, low or no vernalization requirement; +, vernalization requirement.

Loss of FLC function causes markedly early flowering and loss or reduction in the vernalization requirement. However, there is a variation in vernalization requirement among accessions not including early flowering accessions. QTL analysis using a population derived from parental accessions showing different vernalization requirements but both having a vernalization requirement also identified the colocalization of QTLs and the FLC gene. Using an F2 population derived from a cross between two parental accessions of Chinese cabbage (B. rapa) both having a vernalization requirement, QTLs for flowering time colocalized with BrFLC1 and BrFLC5 (Kakizaki et al., 2011). The repression rate of BrFLC1 and BrFLC5 following cold treatment in the later flowering time accession was lower than in the earlier flowering time accession (Table 2; Kakizaki et al., 2011), suggesting that this different rate of repression of FLC expression may be involved in the flowering time difference. It was considered that BrFLC5 is a pseudogene because of a mutation in the splicing donor site (G to A). However, a functional BrFLC5 allele has been identified in some accessions and shown to be a weak regulator of flowering time (Xi et al., 2018). We confirmed that the later flowering time accession used in Kakizaki et al. (2011) had a functional FLC5 allele in spite of sequence basis (G allele), suggesting that colocalization of QTL and BrFLC5 is due to the difference of BrFLC5 function between parental accessions. QTL analysis was also performed using 194 Chinese cabbage accessions including 40 spring, 37 summer, and 117 autumn types, of which 177 accessions showed a vernalization requirement. The order of increasing vernalization requirement is spring, autumn, and summer accessions. B. rapa Vernalization Insensitive 3.1 (BrVIN3.1) and BrFLC1 have been identified as sources of variation in bolting time (Su et al., 2018). In A. thaliana, VIN3 is involved in FLC silencing during cold treatment and is induced by cold treatment (Kim and Sung, 2013). Five haplotypes of BrVIN3.1 with sequence variation in the promoter regions have been identified. Three haplotypes of BrFLC1 with two main groups and one minor group had sequence polymorphism in non-coding regions (Su et al., 2018). These sequence polymorphisms in non-coding regions in BrVIN3.1 or BrFLC1 may result in variation in the vernalization requirement in B. rapa. In case of the difference in vernalization requirement of B. oleracea, a QTL overlapping BoFLC2 has been identified. There are cis polymorphisms in BoFLC2 that influence the expression dynamics in response to cold treatment especially the reactivation rate on return to warm conditions in purple sprouting broccoli (Table 2; Irwin et al., 2016). In the European winter oilseed rape (B. napus), BnaFLC.A02 (BrFLC2 ortholog) has been detected as candidate gene giving rise to the QTL. Higher expression levels of BnaFLC.A02 before cold treatment, lower repression rate following cold treatment, and higher reactivation rate on return to warm conditions of BnaFLC.A02 were found in the later flowering time accession. The amino acid sequence of BnaFLC.A02 was identical between the earlier and later flowering time accessions. In contrast, there were sequence polymorphisms in non-coding intronic regions between them, which could result in a difference in FLC expression and modified vernalization requirement (Table 2; Tudor et al., 2020).

FLC1, FLC2, and FLC3 act as floral repressors in both B. rapa and B. oleracea (Kim et al., 2007; Itabashi et al., 2019; Takada et al., 2019). It has not been shown whether amino acid sequence differences among functional FLC paralogs could lead to differences in the function as floral repressor or variation in vernalization requirement. There is a variation in expression levels among FLC paralogs before and following vernalization, and this is also shown in the repression rate of their expression following vernalization (Itabashi et al., 2019; Schiessl et al., 2019; Takada et al., 2019). These results suggest that variation in vernalization requirement is due to the difference in transcriptional repression rate of FLC between accessions, and this may be due to sequence polymorphisms in the non-coding regions. Furthermore, the fact that a change in one FLC paralog affects vernalization requirement suggests that the FLC paralogs may be functioning additively.

Transposon Insertion Causes Variation of Vernalization Response

Transposable elements (TEs) are DNA sequences that can change their location in the genome, and they can play a role in plant genome evolution (Fujimoto et al., 2012; Hosaka and Kakutani, 2018). In B. rapa, TE DNA is methylated, and TEs are epigenetically silenced (Fujimoto et al., 2008b; Sasaki et al., 2011; Takahashi et al.,2018a,b). The variation in the genome structure of orthologous loci between B. rapa and B. oleracea is due to TE insertions; the B. oleracea genome has more TE insertions than the B. rapa genome in orthologous genomic regions, which results in a larger genome size in B. oleracea than in B. rapa (Fujimoto et al., 2006a; Liu et al., 2014). TE insertions can cause loss of protein function or gene expression or generate a new expression pattern (Miura et al., 2001; Fujimoto et al., 2006b, 2008a, 2011; Saze and Kakutani, 2007; Naito et al., 2009; Hosaka and Kakutani, 2018).

A TE insertion has been identified in some alleles of FLC in the genus Brassica. Long TE insertions in the first intron of BrFLC2 and BrFLC3 were detected in the extremely late flowering time accession, Tsukena No. 2 (Kitamoto et al., 2014). In A. thaliana, the Landsberg erecta (Ler) accession has a TE in the first intron, and this insertion results in a low level of FLC expression (Gazzani et al., 2003). In contrast, insertion of a TE in the first intron of BrFLC2 or BrFLC3 in Tsukena No. 2 does not affect the FLC expression per se. However, weak repression of BrFLC2 and BrFLC3 following cold exposure has been detected, suggesting that the TE insertion disrupts the vernalization response (Table 2; Kitamoto et al., 2014). A similar phenomenon has been observed in radish (Raphanus sativus); a 1,627-bp insertion in the first intron of RsFLC2 did not affect the RsFLC2 expression level before cold treatment but weakened its repression rate during vernalization, resulting in a late-bolting phenotype (Wang et al., 2018). These results suggest that a TE insertion might disrupt a cis element of the vernalization response in the first intron or inhibit the recruitment of the POLYCOMB REPRESSIVE COMPLEX 2 (PRC2), which plays a role in epigenetic silencing of FLC during vernalization, to the FLC locus. In addition to the TE insertion, an insertion/deletion in the second intron of BoFLC1 may alter gene expression and is associated with variation in flowering time of cabbage varieties (Abuyusuf et al., 2019).

In B. napus, there was TE insertion in the promoter region of some FLC paralogs, and this insertion affects the vernalization requirement. A 621-bp TE insertion in the upstream region of BnaFLC.A10 (BrFLC1 ortholog) was associated with lower rate of BnaFLC.A10 repression during cold treatment (Table 2; Hou et al., 2012). This 621-bp TE insertion is observed in 73% of winter-type accessions (449 of 619 accessions including Tapidor and Darmor-bzh) and associated with high vernalization requirement (Yin et al., 2020). A 4,422-bp TE insertion is observed in BnaFLC.A10 of the semiwinter type (Zhongshuang 11, Ningyou 7), and its expression level before and following cold treatment in semiwinter type was lower than in winter types (Table 2). About 57% of semiwinter accessions have this 4,422-bp TE insertion (Yin et al., 2020). A TE insertion results in loss of FLC function in spring-type accessions; a 5,625-bp TE insertion in the first exon of BnaFLC.A10 (in about 55% of spring-type accessions) and 810-bp TE insertion in the exon 7 of BnaFLC.A02 (BrFLC2 ortholog) (about 7%) cause loss of function as does a 2,833-bp insertion in the first intron of BnaFLC.A02 (about 18%) (Table 2; Chen et al., 2018; Yin et al., 2020).

These data indicate that TE insertions play an important role in the determination of flowering time and vernalization requirement in the genus Brassica.

Histone Modification Triggers Epigenetic Silencing of the FLC Following Vernalization

Histone modification is an epigenetic modification that plays a role in the regulation of gene expression (Pfluger and Wagner, 2007; Richards, 2011; Fujimoto et al., 2012). Genome-wide histone modification states have been examined by chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq) in many plant species. In B. rapa, di-methylation of histone H3 lysine 9 (H3K9me2) and trimethylation of histone H3 lysine 27 (H3K27me3) have been mapped genome wide (Takahashi et al., 2018a; Akter et al., 2019; Payá-Milans et al., 2019). In B. rapa, H3K9me2 was overrepresented in TEs, and there were low number of genes having H3K9me2 marks (Takahashi et al., 2018a). About 30% of genes had H3K27me3 marks, and H3K27me3 marks were associated with low level of gene expression and high level of tissue-specific gene expression (Akter et al., 2019; Payá-Milans et al., 2019). H3K27me3 modification is catalyzed by the PRC2, and in B. rapa, a mutant of the CURLY LEAF (CLF) gene, which is the enzymatic core of PRC2, showed decreased H3K27me3 level (Payá-Milans et al., 2019), suggesting that PRC2 plays a role in H3K27me3 in B. rapa as in other plant species.

In A. thaliana, repression of FLC expression during vernalization is associated with switching of chromatin states from enrichment of active histone marks (H3K4me3, H3K36me3) to repressive histone marks (H3K27me3) at the FLC locus (Berry and Dean, 2015). During prolonged cold treatment, there is accumulation of H3K27me3 within the nucleation region, which consists of a DNA region associated with one or two nucleosomes and harboring the first exon and the start of first intron. H3K27me3 spreads over the entire region of FLC when temperatures are warm (Xi et al., 2020). A cis DNA element in the first intron of FLC [termed the RY element (CATGCA)] that is essential for FLC repression during vernalization and the maintenance of FLC silencing when temperatures are warm has been identified (Qüesta et al., 2016; Yuan et al., 2016). In B. rapa, H3K4me3 accumulation was found in the nucleation region of all four BrFLC paralogs before exposure to cold (Kawanabe et al., 2016). During vernalization, accumulation of H3K27me3 within the nucleation region of all four BrFLC paralogs with decreased expression was observed (Akter et al., 2020; Figure 1). After return to warm conditions, H3K27me3 accumulation spreads across the four BrFLC paralogs maintaining silencing (Kawanabe et al., 2016; Akter et al., 2019; Figure 1). The position of the nucleation region is conserved between A. thaliana and B. rapa, but there is less conservation of first intron sequences (Figure 1). Two RY elements are conserved in four BrFLC paralogs except in BrFLC1 where there is a mutation in one of the two RY elements. Like in A. thaliana, PRC2 could be recruited to the nucleation regions of the four BrFLC paralogs (Akter et al., 2019).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Open in a new tab

H3K27me3 pattern during vernalization in BrFLC1. Left panel shows the pattern of accumulation of H3K27me3 marks during vernalization. Right panel shows the expression pattern of BrFLC1 during vernalization. BrFLC2, BrFLC3, and BrFLC5 showed similar H3K27me3 pattern to BrFLC1 (Akter et al., 2019).

The genome-wide level of H3K27me3 in B. rapa was compared between non-vernalized, 4 weeks vernalized, and sample upon return to warm temperature after 4 weeks vernalization. Between the non-vernalized and 4 weeks vernalized samples, 6,814 genes showed a difference in H3K27me3 level, and 99% of genes showed decreased H3K27me3 following vernalization. Between the non-vernalized and the sample upon return to warm temperature after 4 weeks vernalization, 189 genes showed a difference in H3K27me3 level, and 85% of genes showed increased H3K27me3 following vernalization. In A. thaliana, 380 genes showed a difference in H3K27me3 level between non-vernalized and sample upon return to warm temperature following 4 weeks vernalization, and only the FLC gene showed increased H3K27me3 levels following vernalization (Akter et al., 2019). A trend toward increased levels of H3K27me3 following vernalization in A. thaliana has been reported (Xi et al., 2020). A limited number of genes such as B. rapa MADS AFFECTING FLOWERING (BrMAF) genes, which are related to FLC, showed a similar H3K27me3 accumulation pattern; H3K27me3 accumulated in a specific region during vernalization and then spread upon returning to warm temperatures after vernalization (Akter et al., 2019). At the transcriptional level, some genes showed a similar expression pattern to FLC during cold treatment in A. thaliana (Xi et al., 2020). Some genes showed a change in H3K27me3 accumulation following vernalization, but only a limited number of genes showed an H3K27me3 modification pattern similar to that of FLC, where vernalization leads to H3K27me3 accumulation in the specific regions (nucleation region) and then spread throughout the gene when temperature is returned (Akter et al., 2019).

Are Long Non-Coding Rnas Vernalization Players?

In A. thaliana, three cold-induced non-coding RNAs (COOLAIR, COLD ASSISTED INTRONIC NON-CODING RNA (COLDAIR), and COLDWRAP) have been identified. COOLAIR is transcribed in the antisense direction, and COLDAIR and COLDWRAP are transcribed in the sense direction relative to FLC messenger RNA (mRNA) transcription. COOLAIR transcripts start from downstream of the poly-A site to the promoter region of FLC (Figure 2; Swiezewski et al., 2009). COLDAIR is derived from the first intron and COLDWRAP from the promoter region (starts at 225 bp upstream from transcription start site) of FLC (Figure 2; Heo and Sung, 2011; Kim and Sung, 2017). These non-coding RNAs are involved in FLC silencing and maintenance of the repressed condition (Swiezewski et al., 2009; Heo and Sung, 2011; Kim and Sung, 2017; Whittaker and Dean, 2017). COOLAIR-like transcripts have been identified in five species of Brassicaceae, Arabidopsis lyrata, Arabis alpina, Capsella rubella, Eutrema salsugineum, and B. rapa. Although there is low conservation of COOLAIR-like sequences between species, secondary structures show similarity, suggesting that the functional role, the regulation of FLC expression during vernalization, may be conserved in Brassicaceae species (Hawkes et al., 2016).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Open in a new tab

Schematic view of the position of cold-induced non-coding RNAs in A. thaliana and B. rapa. There is no sequence similarity between the putative vernalization response element (VRE) in A. thaliana and the first intron of four BrFLC paralogs. Only BrFLC2 has antisense transcripts, BrFLC2as.

In B. rapa, COOLAIR-like transcripts have been identified only at the BrFLC2 locus and are termed BrFLC2as, while no COOLAIR-like transcript was detected from the other three BrFLC loci (Figure 2; Li et al., 2016; Shea et al., 2019). COOLAIR has two transcripts, proximal site (class I, ∼400 nt) and distal site (class II, ∼750 nt), and BrFLC2as also has two different length transcripts, class I (short, 357, 425, and 510 nt) and class II (long, 665 and 767nt) (Li et al., 2016). BrFLC2as was highly induced by short-term cold treatment, and class II BrFLC2as was at a higher level than class I BrFLC2as (Li et al., 2016; Shea et al., 2019). Similarity of secondary structure and the characteristic of being induced by short-term cold treatment in both BrFLC2as and COOLAIR suggests a functional similarity (Li et al., 2016). However, the other three BrFLC paralogs also show decreased expression during vernalization in spite of no cold-induced COOLAIR-like transcripts being detected (Li et al., 2016; Shea et al., 2019). BrFLC2as may be involved in the silencing of the other three BrFLC paralogs. Overexpression of the BrFLC2as resulted in reduced BrFLC1, BrFLC2, and BrFLC3 expression leading to an early flowering phenotype, suggesting that BrFLC2as may be involved not only in the repression of BrFLC2 but also in the repression of the BrFLC1 and BrFLC3 genes (Li et al., 2016). However, this experiment does not rule out the possibility that repression of the three BrFLC genes is due to posttranscriptional gene silencing because the introduced BrFLC2as sequence includes the exon 1 region of BrFLC2 and may silence all three genes (Li et al., 2016). Furthermore, there is a question whether BrFLC2as is able to function in trans because COOLAIR functions in cis (Csorba et al., 2014). Further study will be needed to elucidate the role of BrFLC2as in the vernalization mechanism in B. rapa.

In A. thaliana, COLDAIR and COLDWRAP play a role in recruitment of PRC2 to the FLC locus (Kim and Sung, 2017). However, neither COLDAIR nor COLDWRAP-like transcripts nor other cold-induced transcripts from the promoter or first intron have been identified in the four FLC paralogs of B. rapa (Li et al., 2016; Shea et al., 2019). However, accumulation of H3K27me3 was confirmed in all four BrFLC paralogs (Akter et al., 2019), leading to the question of how PRC2 is recruited to the BrFLC loci during vernalization.

Cold-induced natural antisense transcripts (NATs) were also identified in two BrMAF genes in B. rapa. In B. rapa, there are five BrMAF genes, and three of these five BrMAF genes were repressed following vernalization (Akter et al., 2019). Accumulation of H3K27me3 during vernalization also has been shown in these three BrMAF genes (Akter et al., 2019). In addition, MAF1 and MAF2 isolated from Pak-choi (B. rapa var. chinensis), termed BcMAF1 and BcMAF2, respectively, function as floral repressors (Huang et al., 2018, 2019). These cold-inducible NATs derived from BrMAF loci may have a similar function to COOLAIR. In A. thaliana, MAF4 has an overlapped NAT termed MAS. MAF4 is induced early in cold treatment, and MAS is coordinately expressed during the cold treatment (Zhao et al., 2018). Repression or silencing of MAF4 expression did not affect MAS expression, while repression of MAS expression reduced MAF4 induction. These results suggest that MAS plays a positive role in MAF4 expression. In B. rapa, coordinate expression of mRNA and the NAT pair following vernalization was observed in some genes but not in BrMAF genes (Shea et al., 2019). This coordinate expression in mRNA and NAT pairs may have a role in vernalization or the cold response.

Perspective

Whole genome triplication results in multiple copies of FLC paralogs in the genus Brassica. FLC1, FLC2, and FLC3 act as floral repressors in both B. rapa and B. oleracea (Kim et al., 2007; Itabashi et al., 2019; Takada et al., 2019), suggesting that all three FLC paralogs need to be considered to understand the vernalization mechanism. There is a difference in transcriptional level before vernalization among three FLC paralogs in both B. rapa and B. oleracea, and between accessions within species, there are differences in which FLC paralog shows the highest expression (Itabashi et al., 2019; Takada et al., 2019). A similar situation is observed in B. napus, which has nine FLC paralogs (Schiessl et al., 2019). Different expression levels before vernalization between paralogs could be due to sequence polymorphisms in the promoter regions. In addition, sequence polymorphisms in the promoter region could also be involved in the difference in expression levels in each FLC between accessions. The correlation between the total level of FLC expression before vernalization and the vernalization requirement suggests that the level of FLC expression before vernalization is associated with the diversity of vernalization requirement in B. rapa (Takada et al., 2019). We need to identify the region or cis-element controlling FLC expression level to understand the variation in vernalization requirement between accessions.

There is also a variation in the rate of repression of FLC expression among paralogs during vernalization with a difference between accessions as to which FLC paralog shows a low repression rate. A low repression rate of FLC genes is an important factor in generating a vernalization requirement, and in this review, some examples are shown such as a TE insertion in the first intron or a TE insertion in the promoter region, which affect this requirement (Gazzani et al., 2003; Hou et al., 2012; Kitamoto et al., 2014; Yin et al., 2020). There is a need to clarify the complexity that arises from multiple FLC paralogs. Furthermore, non-coding RNAs, which can recruit PRC2 to FLC loci, have not been identified, and a vernalization responsive element (VRE) in the genus Brassica has not been identified. Identification of a VRE may clarify the association between VRE sequence polymorphism and variation in repression rate following vernalization between paralogs or between accessions within species.

Author Contributions

TK, KO, ED, and RF conceptualized the manuscript. AA, EI, ED, and RF wrote the manuscript. TK, KO, ED, and RF edited the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Funding. This work was supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) (15H04433 and 18H02173) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) and Fund for the Promotion of International Joint Research (16KK0171) from JSPS.

References

  1. Abuyusuf M., Nath U. K., Kim H. T., Islam M. R., Park J. I., Nou I. S. (2019). Molecular markers based on sequence variation in BoFLC1.C9 for characterizing early-and late-flowering cabbage genotypes. BMC Genet. 20:42. 10.1186/s12863-019-0740-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Akter A., Miyazaki J., Shea D. J., Nishida N., Takada S., Miyaji N., et al. (2020). Gene expression analysis in response to vernalization in Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa L). Hort. J. 89 268–277. 10.2503/hortj.UTD-150 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Akter A., Takahashi S., Deng W., Shea D. J., Itabashi E., Shimizu M., et al. (2019). The histone modification H3 lysine 27 tri-methylation has conserved gene regulatory roles in the triplicated genome of Brassica rapa L. DNA Res. 26 433–443. 10.1093/dnares/dsz021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Berry S., Dean C. (2015). Environmental perception and epigenetic memory: mechanistic insight through FLC. Plant J. 83 133–148. 10.1111/tpj.12869 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chalhoub B., Denoeud F., Liu S., Parkin I. A., Tang H., Wang X., et al. (2014). Early allopolyploid evolution in the post-neolithic Brassica napus oilseed genome. Science 345 950–953. 10.1126/science.1253435 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen L., Dong F., Cai J., Xin Q., Fang C., Liu L., et al. (2018). A 2.833-kb insertion in BnFLC.A2 and its homeologous exchange with BnFLC.C2 during breeding selection generated early-flowering rapeseed. Mol. Plant 11 222–225. 10.1016/j.molp.2017.09.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Csorba T., Questa J. I., Sun Q., Dean C. (2014). Antisense COOLAIR mediates the coordinated switching of chromatin states at FLC during vernalization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111 16160–16165. 10.1073/pnas.1419030111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fujimoto R., Kinoshita Y., Kawabe A., Kinoshita T., Takashima K., Nordborg M., et al. (2008a). Evolution and control of imprinted FWA genes in the genus Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet. 4:e1000048. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000048 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fujimoto R., Okazaki K., Fukai E., Kusaba M., Nishio T. (2006a). Comparison of the genome structure of the self-incompatibility (S) locus in interspecific pairs of S haplotypes. Genetics 173 1157–1167. 10.1534/genetics.104.037267 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fujimoto R., Sasaki T., Inoue H., Nishio T. (2008b). Hypomethylation and transcriptional reactivation of retrotransposon-like sequences in ddm1 transgenic plants of Brassica rapa. Plant Mol. Biol. 66 463–473. 10.1007/s11103-007-9285-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fujimoto R., Sasaki T., Ishikawa R., Osabe K., Kawanabe T., Dennis E. S. (2012). Molecular mechanisms of epigenetic variation in plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 13 9900–9922. 10.3390/ijms13089900 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fujimoto R., Sasaki T., Kudoh H., Taylor J. M., Kakutani T., Dennis E. S. (2011). Epigenetic variation in the FWA gene within the genus Arabidopsis. Plant J. 66 831–843. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04549.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fujimoto R., Sugimura T., Fukai E., Nishio T. (2006b). Suppression of gene expression of a recessive SP11/SCR allele by an untranscribed SP11/SCR allele in Brassica self-incompatibility. Plant Mol. Biol. 61 577–587. 10.1007/s11103-006-0032-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gazzani S., Gendall A. R., Lister C., Dean C. (2003). Analysis of the molecular basis of flowering time variation in Arabidopsis accessions. Plant Physiol. 132 1107–1114. 10.1104/pp.103.021212 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Groszmann M., Greaves I. K., Albert N., Fujimoto R., Helliwell C. A., Dennis E. S., et al. (2011). Epigenetics in plants-vernalisation and hybrid vigour. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1809 427–437. 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2011.03.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hawkes E. J., Hennelly S. P., Novikova I. V., Irwin J. A., Dean C., Sanbonmatsu K. Y. (2016). COOLAIR antisense RNAs form evolutionarily conserved elaborate secondary structures. Cell Rep. 16 3087–3096. 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.08.045 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Heo J. B., Sung S. (2011). Vernalization-mediated epigenetic silencing by a long intronic noncoding RNA. Science 331 76–79. 10.1126/science.1197349 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hosaka A., Kakutani T. (2018). Transposable elements, genome evolution and transgenerational epigenetic variation. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 49 43–48. 10.1016/j.gde.2018.02.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hou J., Long Y., Raman H., Zou X., Wang J., Dai S., et al. (2012). A Tourist-like MITE insertion in the upstream region of the BnFLC. A10 gene is associated with vernalization requirement in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). BMC Plant Biol. 12:238. 10.1186/1471-2229-12-238 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Huang F., Liu T., Hou X. (2018). Isolation and functional characterization of a floral repressor, BcMAF1, from Pak-choi (Brassica rapa ssp. chinensis). Front. Plant Sci. 9:290. 10.3389/fpls.2018.00290 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Huang F., Liu T., Tang J., Duan W., Hou X. (2019). BcMAF2 activates BcTEM1 and represses flowering in Pak-choi (Brassica rapa ssp. chinensis). Plant Mol. Biol. 100 19–32. 10.1007/s11103-019-00867-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Irwin J. A., Lister C., Soumpourou E., Zhang Y., Howell E. C., Teakle G., et al. (2012). Functional alleles of the flowering time regulator FRIGIDA in the Brassica oleracea genome. BMC Plant Biol. 12:21. 10.1186/1471-2229-12-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Irwin J. A., Soumpourou E., Lister C., Ligthart J. D., Kennedy S., Dean C. (2016). Nucleotide polymorphism affecting FLC expression underpins heading date variation in horticultural brassicas. Plant J. 87 597–605. 10.1111/tpj.13221 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Itabashi E., Osabe K., Fujimoto R., Kakizaki T. (2018). Epigenetic regulation of agronomical traits in Brassicaceae. Plant Cell Rep. 37 87–101. 10.1007/s00299-017-2223-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Itabashi E., Shea D. J., Fukino N., Fujimoto R., Okazaki K., Kakizaki T., et al. (2019). Comparison of cold responses for orthologs of cabbage vernalization-related genes. Hort. J. 4 462–470. 10.2503/hortj.UTD-059 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kakizaki T., Kato T., Fukino N., Ishida M., Hatakeyama K., Matsumoto S. (2011). Identification of quantitative trait loci controlling late bolting in Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa L.) parental line Nou 6 gou. Breed. Sci. 61 151–159. 10.1270/jsbbs.61.151 26081539 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kawanabe T., Osabe K., Itabashi E., Okazaki K., Dennis E. S., Fujimoto R. (2016). Development of primer sets that can verify the enrichment of histone modifications, and their application to examining vernalization-mediated chromatin changes in Brassica rapa L. Genes Genet. Syst. 91 1–10. 10.1266/ggs.15-00058 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kim D. H., Sung S. (2013). Coordination of the vernalization response through a VIN3 and FLC gene family regulatory network in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 25 454–469. 10.1105/tpc.112.104760 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kim D. H., Sung S. (2017). Vernalization-triggered intragenic chromatin loop formation by long noncoding RNAs. Dev. Cell 40 302–312. 10.1016/j.devcel.2016.12.021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kim S. Y., Park B. S., Kwon S. J., Kim J., Lim M. H., Park Y. D., et al. (2007). Delayed flowering time in Arabidopsis and Brassica rapa by the overexpression of FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC) homologs isolated from Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa L.: ssp. pekinensis). Plant Cell Rep. 26 327–336. 10.1007/s00299-006-0243-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kitamoto N., Yui S., Nishikawa K., Takahata Y., Yokoi S. (2014). A naturally occurring long insertion in the first intron in the Brassica rapa FLC2 gene causes delayed bolting. Euphytica 196 213–223. 10.1007/s10681-013-1025-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Kole C., Quijada P., Michaels S. D., Amasino R. M., Osborn T. C. (2001). Evidence for homology of flowering-time genes VFR2 from Brassica rapa and FLC from Arabidopsis thaliana. Theor. Appl. Genet. 102 425–430. 10.1007/s001220051663 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Li F., Kitashiba H., Inaba K., Nishio T. (2009). A Brassica rapa linkage map of EST-based SNP markers for identification of candidate genes controlling flowering time and leaf morphological traits. DNA Res. 16 311–323. 10.1093/dnares/dsp020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Li X., Zhang S., Bai J., He Y. (2016). Tuning growth cycles of Brassica crops via natural antisense transcripts of BrFLC. Plant Biotechnol. J. 14 905–914. 10.1111/pbi.12443 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Liu S., Liu Y., Yang X., Tong C., Edwards D., Parkin I. A., et al. (2014). The Brassica oleracea genome reveals the asymmetrical evolution of polyploid genomes. Nat. Commun. 5:3930. 10.1038/ncomms4930 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Lou P., Zhao J., Kim J. S., Shen S., Del Carpio D. P., Song X., et al. (2007). Quantitative trait loci for flowering time and morphological traits in multiple populations of Brassica rapa. J. Exp. Bot. 58 4005–4016. 10.1093/jxb/erm255 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Michaels S. D., Amasino R. M. (1999). FLOWERING LOCUS C encodes a novel MADS domain protein that acts as a repressor of flowering. Plant Cell 11 949–956. 10.1105/tpc.11.5.949 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Miura A., Yonebayashi S., Watanabe K., Toyama T., Shimada H., Kakutani T. (2001). Mobilization of transposons by a mutation abolishing full DNA methylation in Arabidopsis. Nature 411 212–214. 10.1038/35075612 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Nagaharu U. (1935). Genome analysis in Brassica with special reference to the experimental formation of B. napus and peculiar mode of fertilization. Jpn. J. Bot. 7 389–452. [Google Scholar]
  40. Naito K., Zhang F., Tsukiyama T., Saito H., Hancock C. N., Richardson A. O., et al. (2009). Unexpected consequences of a sudden and massive transposon amplification on rice gene expression. Nature 461 1130–1134. 10.1038/nature08479 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Okazaki K., Sakamoto K., Kikuchi R., Saito A., Togashi E., Kuginuki Y., et al. (2007). Mapping and characterization of FLC homologs and QTL analysis of flowering time in Brassica oleracea. Theor. Appl. Genet. 114 595–608. 10.1007/s00122-006-0460-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Payá-Milans M., Poza-Viejo L., Martín-Uriz P. S., Lara-Astiaso D., Wilkinson M. D., Crevillén P. (2019). Genome-wide analysis of the H3K27me3 epigenome and transcriptome in Brassica rapa. GigaScience 8:giz147. 10.1093/gigascience/giz147 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Pfluger J., Wagner D. (2007). Histone modifications and dynamic regulation of genome accessibility in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 10 645–652. 10.1016/j.pbi.2007.07.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Qüesta J., Song J., Geraldo N., An H., Dean C. (2016). Arabidopsis transcriptional repressor VAL1 triggers Polycomb silencing at FLC during vernalization. Science 353 485–488. 10.1126/science.aaf7354 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Raman H., Raman R., Coombes N., Song J., Prangnell R., Bandaranayake C., et al. (2016). Genome-wide association analyses reveal complex genetic architecture underlying natural variation for flowering time in canola. Plant Cell Environ. 39 1228–1239. 10.1111/pce.12644 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Richards E. J. (2011). Natural epigenetic variation in plant species: a view from the field. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 14 204–209. 10.1016/j.pbi.2011.03.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Ridge S., Brown P. H., Hecht V., Driessen R. G., Weller J. L. (2015). The role of BoFLC2 in cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis L.) reproductive development. J. Exp. Bot. 66 125–135. 10.1093/jxb/eru408 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Sasaki T., Fujimoto R., Kishitani S., Nishio T. (2011). Analysis of target sequences of DDM1s in Brassica rapa by MSAP. Plant Cell Rep. 30 81–88. 10.1007/s00299-010-0946-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Saze H., Kakutani T. (2007). Heritable epigenetic mutation of a transposon-flanked Arabidopsis gene due to lack of the chromatin-remodeling factor DDM1. EMBO J. 26 3641–3652. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601788 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Schiessl S. V., Quezada-Martinez D., Tebartz E., Snowdon R. J., Qian L. (2019). The vernalisation regulator FLOWERING LOCUS C is differentially expressed in biennial and annual Brassica napus. Sci. Rep. 9:14911. 10.1038/s41598-019-51212-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Schranz M. E., Quijada P., Sung S. B., Lukens L., Amasino R., Osborn T. C. (2002). Characterization and effects of the replicated flowering time gene FLC in Brassica rapa. Genetics 162 1457–1468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Shea D. J., Itabashi E., Takada S., Fukai E., Kakizaki T., Fujimoto R., et al. (2018). The role of FLOWERING LOCUS C in vernalisation of Brassica: the importance of vernalisation research in the face of climate change. Crop Pasture Sci. 69 30–39. 10.1071/CP16468 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  53. Shea D. J., Nishida N., Takada S., Itabashi E., Takahashi S., Akter A. (2019). Long noncoding RNAs in Brassica rapa L. following vernalization. Sci. Rep. 9:9302. 10.1038/s41598-019-45650-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Sheldon C. C., Burn J. E., Perez P. P., Metzger J., Edwards J. A., Peacock W. J., et al. (1999). The FLF MADS box gene: a repressor of flowering in Arabidopsis regulated by vernalization and methylation. Plant Cell 11 445–458. 10.1105/tpc.11.3.445 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Su T., Wang W., Li P., Zhang B., Li P., Xin X., et al. (2018). A genomic variation map provides insights into the genetic basis of spring Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa ssp. pekinensis) selection. Mol. Plant 11 1360–1376. 10.1016/j.molp.2018.08.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Swiezewski S., Liu F., Magusin A., Dean C. (2009). Cold-induced silencing by long antisense transcripts of an Arabidopsis Polycomb target. Nature 462 799–802. 10.1038/nature08618 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Takada S., Akter A., Itabashi E., Nishida N., Shea D. J., Miyaji N., et al. (2019). The role of FRIGIDA and FLOWERING LOCUS C genes in flowering time of Brassica rapa leafy vegetables. Sci. Rep. 9:13843. 10.1038/s41598-019-50122-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Takahashi S., Fukushima N., Osabe K., Itabashi E., Shimizu M., Miyaji N., et al. (2018b). Identification of DNA methylated regions by using methylated DNA immunoprecipitation sequencing in Brassica rapa. Crop Pasture Sci. 69 107–120. 10.1071/CP17394 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  59. Takahashi S., Osabe K., Fukushima N., Takuno S., Miyaji N., Shimizu M., et al. (2018a). Genome-wide characterization of DNA methylation, small RNA expression, and histone H3 lysine nine di-methylation in Brassica rapa L. DNA Res. 25 511–520. 10.1093/dnares/dsy021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Tudor E. H., Jones D. M., He Z., Bancroft I., Trick M., Wells R., et al. (2020). QTL-seq identifies BnaFT.A02 and BnaFLC.A02 as candidates for variation in vernalisation requirement and response in winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus). Plant Biotechnol. J. 18 2466–2481. 10.1111/pbi.13421 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Wang J., Qiu Y., Cheng F., Chen X., Zhang X., Wang H., et al. (2017). Genome-wide identification, characterization, and evolutionary analysis of flowering genes in radish (Raphanus sativus L.). BMC Genomics 18:981. 10.1186/s12864-017-4377-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Wang Q., Zhang Y., Zhang L. (2018). A naturally occurring insertion in the RsFLC2 gene associated with late-bolting trait in radish (Raphanus sativus L.). Mol. Breed. 38:137 10.1007/s11032-018-0897-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  63. Wang X., Wang H., Wang J., Sun R., Wu J., Liu S., et al. (2011). The genome of the mesopolyploid crop species Brassica rapa. Nat. Genet. 43 1035–1039. 10.1038/ng.919 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Whittaker C., Dean C. (2017). The FLC Locus: a platform for discoveries in epigenetics and adaptation. Ann. Rev. Cell. Dev. Biol. 33 555–575. 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100616-060546 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Wu J., Wei K., Cheng F., Li S., Wang Q., Zhao J., et al. (2012). A naturally occurring InDel variation in BraA.FLC.b (BrFLC2) associated with flowering time variation in Brassica rapa. BMC Plant Biol. 12:151. 10.1186/1471-2229-12-151 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Xi X., Wei K., Gao B., Liu J., Liang J., Cheng F., et al. (2018). BrFLC5: a weak regulator of flowering time in Brassica rapa. Theor. Appl. Genet. 131 2107–2116. 10.1007/s00122-018-3139-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Xi Y., Park S. R., Kim D. H., Kim E. D., Sung S. (2020). Transcriptome and epigenome analyses of vernalization in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 103 1490–1502. 10.1111/tpj.14817 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Yi L., Chen C., Yin S., Li H., Li Z., Wang B., et al. (2018). Sequence variation and functional analysis of a FRIGIDA orthologue (BnaA3. FRI) in Brassica napus. BMC Plant Biol. 18:32. 10.1186/s12870-018-1253-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Yin S., Wan M., Guo C., Wang B., Li H., Li G., et al. (2020). Transposon insertions within alleles of BnaFLC. A10 and BnaFLC. A2 are associated with seasonal crop type in rapeseed. J. Exp. Bot. 71 4729–4741. 10.1093/jxb/eraa237 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Yuan W., Luo X., Li Z., Yang W., Wang Y., Liu R., et al. (2016). A cis cold memory element and a trans epigenome reader mediate Polycomb silencing of FLC by vernalization in Arabidopsis. Nat. Genet. 48 1527–1534. 10.1038/ng.3712 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Zhao J., Kulkarni V., Liu N., Del Carpio D. P., Bucher J. (2010). BrFLC2 (FLOWERINGLOCUS C) as a candidate gene for a vernalization response QTL in Brassica rapa. J. Exp. Bot. 61 1817–1825. 10.1093/jxb/erq048 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Zhao X., Li J., Lian B., Gu H., Li Y., Qi Y. (2018). Global identification of Arabidopsis lncRNAs reveals the regulation of MAF4 by a natural antisense RNA. Nat. Commun. 9:5056. 10.1038/s41467-018-07500-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Plant Science are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES