TABLE 2.
Comparison of clinical variables, microbiota composition, and histology between the no dysbiosis group (n = 10) and the dysbiosis group (n = 11) after successful H. pylori eradication.
| No dysbiosis | Dysbiosis | p-Value | |
| n = 10 | n = 11 | ||
| Male, n (%) | 4 (40.0) | 4 (36.4) | 0.864 |
| Age, years | 58.3 ± 10.4 | 62.0 ± 10.4 | 0.092 |
| Current smoker (n = 20), n (%) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (10.0) | 1.000 |
| Drinker, n (%) | 2 (20.0) | 2 (18.2) | 1.000 |
| AG or IM* | 9 (90.0) | 4 (36.4) | 0.011 |
| Relative abundance of Acinetobacter genus at baseline | 1.3 ± 2.1 | 29.8 ± 26.5 | 0.005 |
| Histology at baseline (updated Sydney classification) | |||
| H. pylori | |||
| Antrum | 1.5 ± 1.1 | 1.5 ± 0.7 | 0.909 |
| Corpus | 1.8 ± 0.8 | 1.8 ± 1.0 | 0.963 |
| Neutrophil infiltration | |||
| Antrum | 1.5 ± 1.1 | 2.1 ± 0.3 | 0.125 |
| Corpus | 2.2 ± 0.4 | 1.6 ± 0.8 | 0.034 |
| Monocyte infiltration | |||
| Antrum | 1.8 ± 0.4 | 1.9 ± 0.3 | 0.500 |
| Corpus | 2.2 ± 0.4 | 1.9 ± 0.5 | 0.188 |
| AG | |||
| Antrum | 1.3 ± 0.7 | 0.6 ± 0.8 | 0.102 |
| Corpus | 0.9 ± 0.8 | 0.4 ± 0.7 | 0.273 |
| IM | |||
| Antrum | 1.0 ± 0.8 | 0.4 ± 0.7 | 0.113 |
| Corpus | 0.6 ± 0.8 | 0.1 ± 0.3 | 0.098 |
| PG I/II ratio | 2.0 ± 0.7 | 5.6 ± 4.3 | 0.022 |
p-Values were calculated using the chi-square test or Student’s t-test. *Histological grade ≥ 1 atrophic gastritis or intestinal metaplasia and pepsinogen I/II ratio < 2.5. “Dysbiosis” means Acinetobacter predominance after H. pylori eradication. Bold style indicates statistical significance. AG, atrophic gastritis; IM, intestinal metaplasia; PG, pepsinogen