Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 9;11:621879. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.621879

TABLE 2.

Comparison of clinical variables, microbiota composition, and histology between the no dysbiosis group (n = 10) and the dysbiosis group (n = 11) after successful H. pylori eradication.

No dysbiosis Dysbiosis p-Value

n = 10 n = 11
Male, n (%) 4 (40.0) 4 (36.4) 0.864
Age, years 58.3 ± 10.4 62.0 ± 10.4 0.092
Current smoker (n = 20), n (%) 0 (0.0) 1 (10.0) 1.000
Drinker, n (%) 2 (20.0) 2 (18.2) 1.000
AG or IM* 9 (90.0) 4 (36.4) 0.011
Relative abundance of Acinetobacter genus at baseline 1.3 ± 2.1 29.8 ± 26.5 0.005
Histology at baseline (updated Sydney classification)
H. pylori
Antrum 1.5 ± 1.1 1.5 ± 0.7 0.909
Corpus 1.8 ± 0.8 1.8 ± 1.0 0.963
Neutrophil infiltration
Antrum 1.5 ± 1.1 2.1 ± 0.3 0.125
Corpus 2.2 ± 0.4 1.6 ± 0.8 0.034
Monocyte infiltration
Antrum 1.8 ± 0.4 1.9 ± 0.3 0.500
Corpus 2.2 ± 0.4 1.9 ± 0.5 0.188
AG
Antrum 1.3 ± 0.7 0.6 ± 0.8 0.102
Corpus 0.9 ± 0.8 0.4 ± 0.7 0.273
IM
Antrum 1.0 ± 0.8 0.4 ± 0.7 0.113
Corpus 0.6 ± 0.8 0.1 ± 0.3 0.098
PG I/II ratio 2.0 ± 0.7 5.6 ± 4.3 0.022

p-Values were calculated using the chi-square test or Student’s t-test. *Histological grade ≥ 1 atrophic gastritis or intestinal metaplasia and pepsinogen I/II ratio < 2.5. “Dysbiosis” means Acinetobacter predominance after H. pylori eradication. Bold style indicates statistical significance. AG, atrophic gastritis; IM, intestinal metaplasia; PG, pepsinogen