Skip to main content
. 2020 May 27;60(2):821–831. doi: 10.1007/s00394-020-02290-5

Table 4.

Association of BMI with frailty status

Referent n = 198 Prefrail n = 206 Frail n = 36
β (SE) 95% CI P value β (SE) 95% CI P value
BMI categories
 < 24 kg/m2, n = 118 Ref 1.44 (0.27) 0.85–2.44 0.174 0.60 (0.81) 0.12–2.95 0.528
24–29 kg/m2, n = 284 Ref Ref Ref Ref Ref
 > 29 kg/m2, n = 208 Ref 3.26 (0.27) 1.93–5.51  < 0.001 6.65 (0.47) 2.62–16.85  < 0.001

The referent was not frail

β coefficient, standard of error (SE) and 95% confidence interval CI were calculated using multinomial logistic regression analysis

Covariates in adjusted models were age (years), energy intake (kJ/d), smoking status (never, current and former smokers), living status (living alone, live with another person and live in retirement home), marital status (unmarried, cohabiting, married, divorced, widow) and vitamin D/ calcium intervention group