Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 22;182(3):195–209. doi: 10.1159/000514193

Table 3.

Comparison of lymphocyte subsets between 2 patients

CD4+ TN TCM TEM TEMRA CD25highCD127–
FoxP3+ (CD4 Treg)
a Subpopulations of CD4+ T cells
Patient #1
Patient #2
48.30
57.70
51.60
25.80
28.50
64.20
18.20
9.76
1.76
0.16
3.25
2.12
CD8+ TN TCM TEM TEMRA CCR7+CD45RA–
CXCR3+ (CD8 Treg)

b Subpopulations of CD8+ T cells
Patient #1
Patient #2
26.40
24.00
48.70
18.60
5.39
15.80
26.40
25.00
19.50
40.50
0.04
0.10
CD4+ cTFH TFH1 TFH2 TFH17 TFH1/TFH17 CCR5+
CD25highFoxP3+ (TFR)

c Subpopulation of TFH cells
Patient #1
Patient #2
44.40
56.00
10.70
8.59
29.00
28.8
39.40
22.70
25.90
38.50
5.66
10.10
1.50
0.70

CD19+ Naive Transition MZ IgM mem CSM GC Plasmablast CD21+ CD21Low B Reg

d Subpopulations of B cells
Patient #1
Patient #2
4.30
4.18
84.20
65.20
5.67
16.80
7.61
15.00
6.19
13.10
5.66
15.10
0.00
0.01
0.31
0.26
95.40 1.30
90.10 5.10
8.22
16.40

TFH, follicular helper T; TN, T naïve; TEM, T effector memory; TCM, T central memory; TEMRA, T effector memory RA; TFH, follicular helper T; GC, germinal center; MZ, marginal zone; CSM, class-switch memory.