Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Feb 23.
Published in final edited form as: Clim Chang Econ (Singap). 2020 Dec 30;N/A:10.1142/s2010007821500020. doi: 10.1142/s2010007821500020

Table 8.

Results of screening analysis for 20 highest-value fisheries: RCP 8.5.

Fishery Annual ex-vessel revenues, 2007–2016 (2018 US$, millions) Change in present value of ex-vessel revenues, 2021–2100: RCP 8.5 versus baseline, r = 3%
Mean Standard deviation Projected change (2018 US$, millions)a Percentage change
American lobster 502.5 111.5 (219.9) −1.4%
Sea scallop 501.4 72.8 (114.3) −0.8%
Walleye pollock 390.4 49.9 189.9 1.6%
White shrimp 246.3 30.1 1269.8 17%
Brown shrimp 216.2 51.6 (176.5) −2.7%
Pacific cod 212.1 56.9 26.8 0.4%
Blue crab 209.4 19.6 649.2 10.2%
Dungeness crab 186.1 48 (1160.5) −20.6%
Pacific halibut 182.9 60.3 28.9 0.5%
Sablefish 140 27.3 403.6 9.5%
Snow crab 113 38.4 (1549.8) −45.3%
Chum salmon 73.3 20.1 (425.6) −19.2%
California market squid 58 22 205.7 11.7%
Chinook salmon 51.8 15.1 24.3 1.5%
Yellowfin sole 49.2 10.5 (349) −23.4%
Pacific hake 46.6 17.9 (78.5) −5.6%
Ocean shrimp 34.2 20.6 (258.2) −24.9%
Summer flounder 31.3 3.6 82.4 8.7%
Longfin squid 29.7 9.2 76 8.4%
Florida stone crab (claws) 28.7 5 (204.3) −23.5%
a

For the purposes of screening analysis, the ex-vessel prices are held constant. The projected change in the present value of ex-vessel revenues assumes that the catch of each species analyzed would increase or decrease over time in direct proportion to the projected change in the species’ available habitat.