Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 23;10:15. doi: 10.1186/s40249-021-00798-4

Table 2.

Sensitivity, negative predicted value (NPV) with confidence intervals (CI), McNemar and Kappa statistic of the different diagnostic tests used

Test method Sensitivity (95% CI) NPV (95% CI) P McNemar Kappa (P value)
Microscopy (KK) 48.8% (37.9–59.9) 13.7% (5.7–26.3) < 0.001 0.126 (P = 0.013)
POC-CCA 84.9% (75.5–91.7) 31.6% (12.6–56.6)  = 0.002 0.395 (P < 0.001)
Serum-based real-time PCR 95.4% (88.5–98.7) 63.6% (30.8–89.1)  = 0.125 0.755 (P < 0.001)
DBS real-time PCR 45.4% (34.6–56.5) 13% (5.4–24.9) < 0.001 0.111 (P = 0.019)

Serum-based real-time PCR and Kato-Katz results were used as reference (any positives by either of these two methods were deemed to be true positive)

DBS dried blood spot, KK Kato-Katz, PCR polymerase chain reaction, POC-CCA point-of-care circulating cathodic antigen