Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 1;8(1):ENEURO.0392-20.2020. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0392-20.2020

Table 2.

Performance in N-back and Wisconsin card sorting task of participants at baseline

Variable Sham 20 Hz iTBS F2 p value
N = 20 N = 20 N = 20 df = 2,59
ACC-back 0 (%) 98.88 (1.63)* 98.88 (1.58)* 98.88 (1.68)* 0.03* 0.985
ACC-back 1 (%) 87.30 (8.44) 89.41 (7.47) 87.70 (9.07)* 0.56* 0.754
ACC-back 2 (%) 64.03 (17.97) 60.83 (18.49) 60.35 (17.98) 0.24 0.785
ACC-back 3 (%) 54.26 (24.23) 53.16 (21.78) 43.60 (20.22) 1.40 0.254
RT-back 0 (ms) 481.67 (65.26) 474.43 (51.76) 474.73 (52.38) 0.10 0.901
RT-back 1 (ms) 413.86 (133.64) 398.77 (131.1) 397.77 (112.21) 0.10 0.903
RT-back 2 (ms) 460.11 (187.06) 472.75 (185.08) 450.45 (162.66) 0.08 0.925
RT-back 3 (ms) 465.97 (150.40) 460.38 (180.65) 478.88 (179.08) 0.06 0.940
Total Correct 127.00 (17.00)* 128.00 (17.00)* 122.00 (21.50)* 1.75* 0.417
Total Correct 94.00 (9.75)* 94.00 (9.75)* 97.00 (9.75)* 0.07* 0.968
Total Errors 23.00 (22.00)* 24.00 (22.00)* 19.00 (19.50)* 1.68* 0.431
Perseverative errors percentage 10.63 (3.15)* 10.94 (2.95)* 9.02 (2.95)* 0.99* 0.611

Values in parentheses indicate SD; *, performed as median and interquartile range and Kruskal–Wallis test; △, χ2 test. ACC: Accuracy; RT: Reaction time.