TABLE 5.
Average correlations for buffalo cows and bulls’ EBVs for the composite and linear traits obtained in the different pedigree scenario in the IMB.
| Traita | Female with records |
Bulls |
||||||
| Y30 | Y60 | GC30 | GC60 | Y30 | Y60 | GC30 | GC60 | |
| FS | 0.92 | 0.85 | 0.89 | 0.80 | 0.94 | 0.86 | 0.93 | 0.85 |
| ST | 0.93 | 0.87 | 0.90 | 0.81 | 0.89 | 0.77 | 0.94 | 0.84 |
| FL | 0.88 | 0.80 | 0.88 | 0.77 | 0.90 | 0.70 | 0.93 | 0.77 |
| UT | 0.89 | 0.80 | 0.85 | 0.73 | 0.92 | 0.79 | 0.92 | 0.80 |
| YP | 0.88 | 0.78 | 0.84 | 0.71 | 0.91 | 0.75 | 0.92 | 0.85 |
| STAT | 0.95 | 0.89 | 0.93 | 0.87 | 0.95 | 0.87 | 0.95 | 0.89 |
| BD | 0.92 | 0.85 | 0.89 | 0.79 | 0.91 | 0.77 | 0.92 | 0.79 |
| BL | 0.92 | 0.84 | 0.90 | 0.81 | 0.94 | 0.85 | 0.95 | 0.87 |
| FA | 0.85 | 0.75 | 0.83 | 0.68 | 0.76 | 0.63 | 0.90 | 0.77 |
| FUA | 0.92 | 0.85 | 0.88 | 0.78 | 0.90 | 0.74 | 0.89 | 0.76 |
| RUW | 0.92 | 0.86 | 0.90 | 0.80 | 0.92 | 0.82 | 0.93 | 0.81 |
| UD | 0.95 | 0.90 | 0.92 | 0.86 | 0.87 | 0.74 | 0.90 | 0.74 |
| TP | 0.88 | 0.80 | 0.86 | 0.75 | 0.85 | 0.72 | 0.91 | 0.81 |
| TL | 0.95 | 0.90 | 0.92 | 0.86 | 0.88 | 0.77 | 0.92 | 0.77 |
| BCS | 0.89 | 0.82 | 0.87 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.59 | 0.90 | 0.78 |
| Average | 0.91 | 0.84 | 0.88 | 0.79 | 0.89 | 0.76 | 0.92 | 0.81 |
aSee Table 1 for trait acronym.