TABLE 5.
Best combination | Concordant,% | Discordant,% | Somers’ D | c-Statistic |
LVEF ≤35% | ||||
α1 + Acv + rMSSD | 82.1 | 17.9 | 0.641 | 0.821 |
Acv + rMSSD + HF | 81.8 | 18.2 | 0.636 | 0.818 |
Acv + rMSSD + pNN50 | 81.5 | 18.5 | 0.629 | 0.815 |
SDNN + Acv + rMSSD | 81.5 | 18.5 | 0.63 | 0.815 |
ULF + Acv + rMSSD | 81.5 | 18.5 | 0.63 | 0.815 |
LVEF >35% | ||||
ULF + Acv + λ25s | 84.4 | 15.6 | 0.689 | 0.844 |
VLF + Acv + λ25s | 83.7 | 16.3 | 0.674 | 0.837 |
ULF + VLF + λ25s | 83.2 | 16.8 | 0.665 | 0.832 |
SDNN + VLF + λ25s | 83.1 | 16.9 | 0.661 | 0.831 |
VLF + λ25s + pNN50 | 83.1 | 16.9 | 0.663 | 0.831 |
All prediction models are adjusted for the effect of age. Abbreviations are explained in the footnote in Table 2.