Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 24;111:4–22. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2021.01.007

Table 2.

Description of study characteristics and findings for other interventions.

Source Study design Setting Participants Outcome domains Primary Outcome Measure (time point) Intervention details Study characteristics Key findings
Other interventions
Van Willigen et al 2020 (UK) [52] Qualitative using semi-structured interviews ICU ICU survivors Perspectives Patient and family perspectives on physical rehabilitation Physical rehabilitation N = 5; age range 23 to 68 years; 4 (80%) male N = 5 family members Rehab should focus on building relationships and good communication, be consistent and start as soon as possible.
Kou et al 2019 [54] Meta-analysis Hospital Adults with an acute and critical illness undergoing rehabilitation Impairments; Activity limitation; HRQoL; Adverse events ADLs (not specified) Nutritional interventions (lectures, counselling, fortified foods, oral nutritional supplements or parenteral/enteral nutrition) plus rehabilitation (defined as comprehensive or individualised expert programme) 2 RCTs; 293 mixed medical patients. No summary data on paticipants Improvements in muscle mass; Short term improvements in Barthel Index at 6 months (SMD 0.30, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.58). No effect on HRQoL. Adverse events not reported
Corner et al 2018 (UK) [53] Qualitative (grounded theory) using semi-structured interviews ICU and post discharge ICU survivors and family members Experiences Experience of rehabilitation and recovery Physical rehabilitation N = 15 mixed medical/surgical patients; age range 30 to 89 years; 11/15 (73%) male 4 family members (dyads) Need to recalibrate past, present and future self and differences between expectation and reality; recovering autonomy needs motivation and support
Suwardianto et al 2018 (Indonesia) [51] RCT ICU Adults admitted to ICU > 24 hours Impairments; activity limitation. MMSE, PFIT Not specified Physical and cognitive therapy. Control no intervention N = 64 mixed medical patients; mean (SD) age controls 48 (11.4) and intervention 59.9 (11) years; 35/64 (55%) male Effect sizes not clearly reported. Improved bed transfers and cognitive function
Felten-Barentz et al 2018 (Netherlands) [71] Qualitative (phenomenology) using semi-structured interviews ICU and post discharge Ventilated adults receiving hydrotherapy Experiences Meaning and experience of hydrotherapy Hydrotherapy N = 8 mixed medical/surgical patients; age range 33 to 73 years; 4/8 (50%) male Feelings of safety and ability to move that can involve families. A turning point in the recovery journey
Ramsay et al 2016 (UK) [56] Mixed methods process evaluation using a questionnaire and focus groups Hospital (post-ICU) Participants from an RCT (intervention and control) RECOVER trial Experiences Experiences of rehabilitation and quality of care Physical (MDT) rehabilitation (enhanced physiotherapy, nutritional care and information provision, case management. Usual care comparator N = 14 focus group participants (+8 family members) 182 experience questionnaires. Median age (IQR for intervention participants 55 years (36, 69) and controls 70 years (63, 78). 50% of intervention participants were male and 66% controls Individualised care and information highly valued. Enabled greater access to physiotherapy and nutritional care
Mehlhorn et al 2014 [55] Narrative SR Post ICU (hospital and community) Adults post ICU admission Impairments; activity limitations; HRQoL; Service outcomes; Adverse events Not specified Rehabilitation 19 studies (9 RCTs); 2510 mixed medical/surgical patients. No summary data of participants PTSD may be reduced; no effect on other outcomes